Abstract
The production of total dissolved gas (TDG) supersaturation resulting from dam discharges has been identified as a causative factor for gas bubble disease (GBD) or mass mortality in fish. In this study, the mitigation solution for fish refuge in supersaturated TDG water was explored by using microbubbles generated by aeration to enhance supersaturated TDG dissipation. The effects of various aeration factors (aeration intensity, water depth, and aerator size) on the dissipation processes of supersaturated TDG were quantitatively investigated through a series of tests conducted in a static aeration column. The results indicated that the dissipation rates of supersaturated TDG increased as a power function with the factors of aeration intensity and aerator size and decreased as a power function with increasing water depth. A universal prediction model for the dissipation rate of supersaturated TDG in the aeration system was developed based on the dimensional analysis of the comprehensive elements, and the parameters in the model were determined using experimental data. The outcomes of this study can furnish an important theoretical foundation and scientific guidance for the utilization of aeration as a measure to alleviate the adverse impacts of supersaturated TDG on fish.
HIGHLIGHTS
Conducting the supersaturated TDG dissipation experiment in a fine-bubble aeration column.
Investigating the impact of different aeration conditions on supersaturated TDG dissipation behavior.
Establishing a correction between the dissipation coefficients and different aeration conditions.
Developing a dissipation coefficient prediction model for universal aeration systems.
Fish biodiversity preservation in river systems.
INTRODUCTION
Total dissolved gas (TDG) supersaturation occurs when the partial pressure of gases in a solution exceeds the surrounding atmospheric pressure (Colt 1984), and this condition can be produced by diverse natural and artificial factors, for instance, a sudden rise in temperature, strong photosynthesis of algae in the water, and flood discharge in dams (Weitkamp & Katz 1980). In recent decades, with more and more hydropower facilities being constructed and put into operation, TDG supersaturation has received tremendous attention worldwide and has been identified as one of the potential impact factors for limiting the biodiversity in the riverine systems (Pleizier et al. 2020). A vast number of air bubbles are entrained by the water flow during the spill discharge and delivered into the bottom regions of the downstream stilling basin, those entrained air bubbles will be driven to excessive dissolution under the conditions of high hydrostatic pressure and strong turbulence intensity in the stilling basin, resulting in supersaturated TDG generation (Geldert et al. 1998; Li et al. 2009). The recovery rate of TDG in rivers from the supersaturated state to the equilibrium saturated state is very slow under natural conditions. For example, the mean recovery rate is only 4.3% per 100 km over a distance range of 600 km downstream of the Three Gorges Project under an initial TDG percent saturation of 143% (Qu et al. 2011). Fish that have been exposed to supersaturated TDG water for extended periods of time will suffer from gas bubble disease (GBD), which increases the risk of sublethal effects or large-scale mortality (Arntzen et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2020). To prevent the riverine ecosystem from being damaged by the supersaturated TDG, a threshold frequency of TDG percent saturation of 115% has been set by the USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency 2020) in the Water Quality Standard (WQS) as the minimum requirement for the survival of aquatic life.
Reducing TDG production at hydropower plants is a feasible strategy to mitigate the damage to fish and other aquatic organisms from supersaturated TDG, and the relevant measures mainly include engineering or operational solutions. For instance, a previous study reported that installing a flow deflector on the spillway face can decrease the angle of entering the water for plunging flow, which results in minimizing the submergence depth of entrained bubbles and air bubble dissolution in the stilling basin (Orlins & Gulliver 2000). Installing baffle blocks in the stilling basin is another engineering measure for reducing TDG production (Huang et al. 2021). This measure works by redirecting the water flow, which transports entrained bubbles to regions of lower pressure at the water surface. The numerical simulation results show that the maximum reduction in TDG production saturation can be achieved by approximately 20% when the flow deflectors or baffle blocks are installed in the actual hydropower facilities compared with the conditions without those configurations (Wang et al. 2019; Huang et al. 2021). However, the widespread applications of the above engineering methods may be limited to use in low-dam projects since the potential adverse effects of those configurations on the structural safety of high-dam projects are still unclear. Additionally, many operational strategies were proposed by many researchers to reduce TDG production based on the numerical simulation method. For example, a previous study by Politano et al. (2012) proposed that concentrating the discharge flow in one spillway could cause the entrained bubbles to migrate closer to shallower water depths than the conditions of spreading it across multiple spillways, which could obtain a lower TDG production level. To reduce the risk of cumulative effects of TDG supersaturation in cascade reservoirs, Feng et al. (2014) and Ma et al. (2019) suggested using an interval-discharge strategy rather than a continuous-discharge strategy to lower the geographical distribution of high TDG levels in downstream reservoirs. Similarly, Wan et al. (2021) reported that the TDG production level and the detention time of supersaturated TDG in downstream rivers could be effectively decreased by employing the flood pulse discharge patterns. The problem of gas supersaturation in hydroelectric plants cannot be completely eliminated due to the requirements for flood prevention, and the generated TDG has the characteristics of high saturation and a far-reaching impact on the downstream rivers, especially in high-dam projects. Therefore, it is necessary to combine various mitigation strategies to minimize the risk of fish being exposed to supersaturated TDG.
Previous studies demonstrated that fish could detect and avoid the supersaturated TDG on their own (Wang et al. 2015; Pleizier et al. 2020). Based on this, another strategy for mitigating the negative impacts of supersaturated TDG on the riverine systems is to create a lower TDG saturation region in downstream rivers for providing fish with temporary shelter from the supersaturated TDG. The critical problem in this mitigation strategy is obtaining a method that can rapidly accelerate the supersaturated TDG dissipation. Supersaturated TDG dissipation is the gas–liquid mass transfer process with a transition from a supersaturated state to a stable equilibrium state, and the dissipation rate depends on turbulence intention, gas–liquid interface area, and the environmental factors (e.g., temperature and atmospheric pressure) (Shen et al. 2014). Based on the understanding of the dissipation mechanism of supersaturated TDG, some methods have been proposed to accelerate the dissipation process of supersaturated TDG, e.g., decompression degassing, activated carbon adsorption, and low-temperature water mixing (Hargreaves & Tucker 1999; Niu et al. 2015; Kamal et al. 2019). However, it is difficult to use the above approaches to treat the supersaturated TDG in large-scale water bodies due to the low treatment efficiency and high economic costs. It is necessary to explore the methods that can treat the practical supersaturated water with reliable dissipation performance, which is important for the protection of the riverine ecosystem and the sustainable development of hydropower engineering.
Bubbles generated by aeration provide a large interfacial area of gas–liquid contact and a strong turbulence intensity of the water body, which can result in a high mass transfer rate between multiple phases in the system. Aeration technology, with its benefits in operation cost and gas transfer efficiency, has been widely used in various fields, e.g., wastewater treatment, fish farming, and chemical and biological industries, etc. (Cheng et al. 2019; Behnisch et al. 2022; Wang et al. 2022). The relevant studies mainly focused on the mass transfer process of the dissolved gases (e.g., oxygen and carbon dioxide) with a transition from an undersaturated state to a stable equilibrium state. Based on field experiments in the feeder channel downstream of Grand Coulee Dam, Murphy & Lichtwardt (2001) reported that aeration can be used to remove the excess dissolved nitrogen from supersaturated water, with a maximum reduction in TDG saturation of 10% possible at a 124.0% upstream TDG saturation. Subsequently, Ou et al. (2016b) investigated the impact of various aeration operating conditions on the dissipation processes of supersaturated TDG based on a self-made coarse-bubble aeration system and obtained a quantitative relationship between the dissipation rate and the factors of aeration intensity and aeration water depth. Yao et al. (2022) developed this relationship, which extended the effect of the configuration factor for the aeration aperture size on the dissipation rate of supersaturated TDG. Those studies were useful in providing a preliminary understanding of the trend in the removal performance of supersaturated TDG at the different aeration conditions for a given aeration system. However, the results of existing studies are still difficult to directly apply to practical engineering since some important design-related impact factors (e.g., tank geometry, aerator type, and aerator arrangement) were not considered in the obtained relationship.
Comprehensive analysis shows that there are two options for minimizing the negative impacts of supersaturated TDG on fish: lowering TDG production and enhancing supersaturated TDG dissipation. However, the supersaturated problem that occurs in riverine systems cannot be completely avoided through the relevant mitigation measures due to the consideration of dam structural safety and flood control. A high dam with a high-water head and large flow discharge can result in TDG being produced in downstream rivers with the characteristics of high production saturation, a slow dissipation rate, and far-reaching influence. Utilizing the aeration technology to treat the supersaturated TDG in large-scale water bodies is a prospective and feasible solution due to its benefits in operating cost and removal performance. Previous research has obtained an empirical correlation between the dissipation performance of supersaturated TDG and the primary aeration factors, including aeration intensity, aeration water depth, and aeration aperture size. However, the effects of the various configuration factors, such as tank geometry, aerator type, and aeration area, on the dissipation performance of supersaturated TDG also need to be investigated. The present investigation comprehensively examined the dissipation performances of supersaturated TDG under two distinct operating conditions, namely gas flow rate and water depth, and one aerator configuration condition, specifically aerator size. This was achieved through a series of tests conducted in a redesigned fine-bubble aeration system. The study utilized empirical data to analyze and establish a correlation between the dissipation rate and different aeration impact factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Experimental apparatus and materials
Experimental procedures and conditions
For each test, the experimental procedure consisted of approximately three steps. First, the supersaturated water with a predetermined TDG saturation was introduced into the aeration column and the water level was maintained at a specific depth. Secondly, the air was injected into the EPDM aerator at a predetermined gas flow rate by controlling the valve located at the position between the air compressor and the gas flowmeter, while the detectors were activated to measure and collect the data on TDG saturation and water temperature in the water. Finally, the test has stopped when the supersaturated TDG in the water had been reduced to the relative equilibrium saturation level (100–105%), and the rationality of the experimental data was verified through post-analysis.
Various aeration conditions, including gas flow rate (Qa), aeration water depth (Ha), and aerator diameter (Da), were carried out to investigate the effect of the operational and configuration factors on the dissipation performance of supersaturated TDG for the fine-bubble aeration system. Detailed information on the experimental conditions is given in Table 1.
Experimental conditions setup (36 test cases in total)
Group number . | Aerator diameter, Da (mm) . | Water depth, Ha (m) . | Gas flow rate, Qa (m3·h−1) . |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 92 | 0.5, 1.0 | 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 |
2 | 215 | 0.5, 1.0 | 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 |
3 | 300 | 0.5, 1.0 | 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 |
Group number . | Aerator diameter, Da (mm) . | Water depth, Ha (m) . | Gas flow rate, Qa (m3·h−1) . |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 92 | 0.5, 1.0 | 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 |
2 | 215 | 0.5, 1.0 | 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 |
3 | 300 | 0.5, 1.0 | 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Obtained findings and dissipation coefficient analysis
Dissipation processes of supersaturated TDG under different conditions (left) and linear fitting (solid lines) for calculating dissipation coefficients (right).
Dissipation processes of supersaturated TDG under different conditions (left) and linear fitting (solid lines) for calculating dissipation coefficients (right).
Dissipation performances analysis
Gas flow rate effects on dissipation coefficients
The correlation between the normalized dissipation coefficient (k20) and gas flow rate (Qa) at different conditions of water depths (Ha) and aerator sizes (Da).
The correlation between the normalized dissipation coefficient (k20) and gas flow rate (Qa) at different conditions of water depths (Ha) and aerator sizes (Da).
The fitting results of the parameters for the correlation between k20 and Qa
Parameters . | Da = 92 mm . | Da = 215 mm . | Da = 300 mm . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ha = 0.5 m . | Ha = 1.0 m . | Ha = 0.5 m . | Ha = 1.0 m . | Ha = 0.5 m . | Ha = 1.0 m . | |
α | 14.77 | 12.20 | 15.58 | 11.55 | 17.37 | 10.91 |
β | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.30 |
R2 | 0.991 | 0.989 | 0.990 | 0.993 | 0.977 | 0.993 |
Parameters . | Da = 92 mm . | Da = 215 mm . | Da = 300 mm . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ha = 0.5 m . | Ha = 1.0 m . | Ha = 0.5 m . | Ha = 1.0 m . | Ha = 0.5 m . | Ha = 1.0 m . | |
α | 14.77 | 12.20 | 15.58 | 11.55 | 17.37 | 10.91 |
β | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.30 |
R2 | 0.991 | 0.989 | 0.990 | 0.993 | 0.977 | 0.993 |
Aerator diameter effects on dissipation coefficients
Effect of Da on k20 at the water depth of Ha = 0.5 m (left) and Ha = 1.0 m (right).
Effect of Da on k20 at the water depth of Ha = 0.5 m (left) and Ha = 1.0 m (right).

Water depth effects on dissipation coefficients
Two water depths with Ha = 0.5 m and Ha = 1.0 m were tested in this study, and the results (Figure 4) showed that k20 increased with the decrease in Ha. For different conditions of Qa and Da, the mean dissipation rates of supersaturated TDG can be improved to 36% when the condition of Ha decreases from 1.0 to 0.5 m. For deeper water depth conditions, a lower TDG concentration difference on both sides of the water and bubbles and a weaker turbulence intensity for the unit water body at a given aeration intensity can be caused, which may reduce the TDG mass transfer rate at the water–bubble and water–air interfaces (Yang et al. 2016).

The correlation between the dissipation coefficient and the various conditions
Discussion on prediction model for dissipation coefficient in aeration system
Relevant variables affecting TDG mass transfer in the aeration system.
Summary of the relevant aeration experiments on the details of tank geometry
Reference . | Tank geometry . | Tank diameter/length × width (mm) . | Aerator shape . | Aerator diameter/length × width (mm) . | Membrane material . | Orifice/slit amount . | Orifice/slit size (μm) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This study | Cylindrical | 300 | Disk | 92–300 | EPDM | 498–5,299 | 100 |
Ou et al. (2016b) | Cylindrical | 400 | Disk | 300 | SS | 41 | 400–800 |
Yao et al. (2022) | Rectangular | 440 × 550 | Plate | 350 × 350 | SS | 63 | 600–900 |
Reference . | Tank geometry . | Tank diameter/length × width (mm) . | Aerator shape . | Aerator diameter/length × width (mm) . | Membrane material . | Orifice/slit amount . | Orifice/slit size (μm) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This study | Cylindrical | 300 | Disk | 92–300 | EPDM | 498–5,299 | 100 |
Ou et al. (2016b) | Cylindrical | 400 | Disk | 300 | SS | 41 | 400–800 |
Yao et al. (2022) | Rectangular | 440 × 550 | Plate | 350 × 350 | SS | 63 | 600–900 |
EPDM, ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber; SS, stainless steel.
Range of the relevant variables used for fitting Equation (9)
Variable . | Qa (m3·h−1) . | Ha (m) . | V (10−3·m3) . | Ac (10−3·m2) . | Aa (10−3·m2) . | k (h−1) . | Re . | We . | Ac0.5/Ha . | Aa/Ac . | ds/Ha (10−4) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range | 0.5–3.0 | 0.4–3.0 | 48–377 | 96–242 | 6.6–90.0 | 2.6–17.3 | 294–18,798 | 9–88,303 | 0.12–1.23 | 0.07–0.73 | 1–30 |
Variable . | Qa (m3·h−1) . | Ha (m) . | V (10−3·m3) . | Ac (10−3·m2) . | Aa (10−3·m2) . | k (h−1) . | Re . | We . | Ac0.5/Ha . | Aa/Ac . | ds/Ha (10−4) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range | 0.5–3.0 | 0.4–3.0 | 48–377 | 96–242 | 6.6–90.0 | 2.6–17.3 | 294–18,798 | 9–88,303 | 0.12–1.23 | 0.07–0.73 | 1–30 |
Furthermore, Equation (14) demonstrates a negative correlation between the dissipation coefficient (k) and both the cross-sectional area of the aeration system (Ac) and the orifice configuration density of the aerator (ϕ). The primary mechanism for gas transfer in the aeration system is bubble transfer (Schierholz et al. 2006). Therefore, if the width of the aeration system is increased while maintaining a constant water volume, the TDG transfer rate at the bubble interface will be weakened, resulting in a reduction of the total dissipation rate of supersaturated TDG in the system. For the given aerated operation conditions, lower floating velocities for bubbles and poor liquid mixing can be achieved with higher configurations of orifice density (Liang et al. 2016), which has a negative effect on the improvement of the dissipation efficiency of supersaturated TDG.
The developed model for forecasting the dissipation coefficients of supersaturated TDG in the aeration system (as represented by Equation (13) or Equation (14)) provides valuable insight into comprehending the correlation between the dissipation rate and pertinent geometric and operational factors. It is important to acknowledge that the application of this model is limited to the prediction and assessment of the treatment efficacy of supersaturated TDG in aeration systems where the aerators are arranged at the bottom. The rationale behind this is that the current assessments exhibit a dearth of pertinent information pertaining to the submergence depth of aerators, which also constitutes a primary domain for prospective research.
CONCLUSIONS
Aeration technology has great potential for mitigating the detrimental effects of supersaturated TDG on riverine ecosystems due to its benefits in operational costs and treatment efficiency. However, its practical applications are limited by the insufficient understanding of the correlation between the dissipation performance of supersaturated TDG and the relevant aeration conditions. To investigate this, sequences of experiments were carried out within a microporous aeration system to assess the impact of different operational and structural variables (including aeration intensity, water depth, and aerator size) on the dissipation efficacy of supersaturated TDG. A temperature-normalized dissipation coefficient was adopted to quantify the dissipation performance of supersaturated TDG under the different aeration conditions. The results indicate that the dissipation coefficients exhibited a positive correlation with the factors of aeration intensity and aerator size, following a power function. Conversely, dissipation coefficients demonstrated a negative correlation with water depth, following a power function. A quantifiable relationship between the dissipation coefficients and the aeration parameters (aeration intensity, aerator size, and water depth) was established. This quantitative relationship was developed based on Ou's study Ou et al. (2016b), which extended the effect of the configuration condition for the aerator size on the dissipation coefficient. Although the predictive accuracy of dissipation coefficients in this quantitative relationship is high, its practical application is restricted to scenarios where the geometric parameters of the aeration tank and the characteristic dissipation coefficient are known. Furthermore, a dissipation coefficient prediction model for supersaturated TDG in the universal aeration system was developed through dimensional analysis of the comprehensive elements. The model analysis revealed a negative correlation between the dissipation coefficient and the cross-sectional area of the aeration system, and orifice configuration density of the aerator. The present model is capable of depicting the correlation between the dissipation performances of supersaturated TDG and the pertinent design and operation parameters. This provides a substantial theoretical basis for the application of aeration as a means of dealing with pragmatic issues related to supersaturated TDG.
To enable the research results to be applied in engineering, it is crucial to address two aspects of research in the future. First, to improve the proposed relationship and model for the dissipation coefficient of supersaturated TDG in aeration systems and make it more suitable for practical use, it is important to collect experimental data on the effects of a wider range of aeration factors (e.g., the submergence depth of the aerator and aerator type) and environmental conditions (e.g., water temperature and sediment concentration) on the dissipation processes of supersaturated TDG. Second, to gain a deeper understanding of the gas–liquid multiphase flow behaviors and TDG field features under varying aeration conditions, it is necessary to develop a numerical model that can accurately predict the mass transfer of supersaturated TDG in aerated flows.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work is supported by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52039006).
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.