To explore the key factors and specific thresholds of water resources limiting economic development, and to provide technical support for water resources management in cities dominated by agriculture similar to Zhangjiakou. We used the Tapio elastic decoupling method to quantitatively evaluate the decoupling relationship between the water resources ecological footprint (WEF) and economic growth. Then the logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) and mathematical statistics are used to identify the key factors and threshold effects. The results show a significant decreasing trend in the WEF and obvious spatial differences in Zhangjiakou between 2006 and 2015, with agricultural ecological footprint dominating all districts and counties (77.54 ± 14.35%). The changes in technological effect are a contributing factor to the decoupling between the WEF and the economy in Zhangjiakou, while the economic effect is the main restricting factor. In particular, there is a high correlation between the WEF and the number of water-saving irrigation machines and the total power of agricultural machinery. According to the findings, for water-scarce cities such as Zhangjiakou, where agriculture is the primary focus, it is suggested that increasing the number of agricultural machinery can effectively alleviate the problem of water scarcity constraining economic development.

  • Combining the water resources ecological footprint theory with the Tapio decoupling model, this paper analyses the changes of water resources ecological footprint and decoupling state in different districts and counties of Zhangjiakou City in terms of time and space.

  • Combining LMDI modelling with mathematical and statistical methods to analyse the key factors affecting water resources and economic change in Zhangjiakou.

Nowadays, the depletion of natural resources and environmental pollution have affected the stability of the human living environment and restricted economic development (Phan 2022). Urban sprawl increases the incomes of residents while further exacerbating the destruction of resources and the environment (Kambu et al. 2022). Economic growth without deterioration of environmental quality is considered to be the best relationship between the economy and the environment. That means the decoupling between economic growth and the water environment. China is one of the 13 water-scarce countries in the world. Therefore, it is important to study the harmonious development of urban economic growth and the water resources environment to solve the contradiction between China's sustainable economic development and the water resources crisis. To explore effective ways to solve this issue, a series of studies have been conducted by relevant institutions and research scholars around the world, including water resource quantification and evaluation systems, water resource and economic development relationships, and their impact mechanisms.

The Ecological Footprint was first proposed by a Canadian ecological economist Willam Rees (1992) in 1992 and refined by his student Wackernagel (1999) as a measure of the extent to which humans use natural resources and the function of life support services provided by nature to humans. This method measures the sustainability of a region by estimating the size of the ecologically productive space required to sustain human consumption of natural resources and assimilate human-generated waste. Comparing this with the ecological carrying capacity of a given population area provides a new way of thinking about the quantitative evaluation of sustainable water resource use. Marti used data envelopment analysis to calculate the environmental efficiency of 45 African countries using the ecological footprint and population as inputs and Gross Domestic Products as outputs (Marti & Puertas 2020). Huang et al. (2008) proposed an ecological footprint model for water resources based on the ecological footprint model, which provides a new approach to quantitatively evaluate the sustainable use of water resources. Su et al. (2022) investigated the characteristics of Japan's water ecological footprint, and compared it with the water ecological footprint of China. The results showed that Japan's agricultural water ecological footprint efficiency was the lowest, and the domestic water ecological footprint efficiency was the highest.

Quantitative evaluation methods for water resources and economic development generally use methods such as the Gini coefficient, Environmental Kuznets curves (EKCs), and decoupling analysis. The Gini coefficients reflect the overall match between regional water resources and socioeconomic status but do not reflect spatial variation (Han et al. 2020). The EKC hypothesis has been the most common and widely studied, but some scholars argue that in some countries or regions, the EKC does not exist (Akbostancı et al. 2009). Some scholars argue that current studies of EKC only describe the phenomena of changes to environmental quality and economic development without analysing the mechanisms that exist between them. Decoupling analysis is the dominant research method in the environmental field because it is simple to determine and does not require much data. The decoupling theory was originally proposed by the OECD in 2002 (OECD 2002), the core principle of this method is that decoupling occurs when the interrelationship between two (or more) physical quantities that have a relationship is weakened (or non-existent). Tapio (2005) defined the critical value of the decoupling state, which is the ratio of the growth rate of environmental stress to the growth rate of socioeconomic growth, as 1, and classified the decoupling state as strong decoupling, strong negative decoupling, weak decoupling, weak negative decoupling, expansive negative decoupling, expansive coupling, recursive decoupling, and recursive coupling. When decoupling analysis is applied to the field of resources and the environment, this method can quantify the relationship between resources, environmental loads, and economic growth. Firstly, the decoupling theory has been used extensively in studies on energy consumption, Wang identified decoupling states for 186 countries in the world, high-income countries initially realized the most desirable strong decoupling, while decoupling states of upper-middle-income and lower-middle-income countries were rather not ideal enough (Wang & Wang 2020). Then, because of the characteristics of the Tapio decoupling model, it is considered the best way to study the relationship between water resources and economic development. Chang applied the Tapio decoupling model to examine the relationship between policy implementation and the performance of water utilization and treatment from 2008 to 2017, and the results showed that policy implementation improved water utilization and treatment efficiency (Chang & Zhu 2021).

Laspeyres and Divisia decomposition are the two most commonly used methods for index decomposition analysis. LMDI, a branch of Divisia, is valued among the many decomposition techniques owing to its full decomposition, lack of residuals, ease of use, consistency of multiplicative and additive decomposition, uniqueness of results, and ease of understanding, and is now widely used in many fields (Ang & Zhang 2000). Tian used the LMDI method to clarify that total water use intensity and the level of development of the water treatment industry were the main factors in wastewater discharge reduction (Tian et al. 2023).

The city's total multi-year average water resources in Zhangjiakou were 1.390 billion m3 (2006–2015), with a per capita water resource of approximately 322 m3, which is below the 500 m3 severe water scarcity line established by the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development study, making it an area of severe water scarcity. Using the Lorenz Gini coefficient and the imbalance index model, Han et al. (2020) showed that Zhangjiakou's water resources and economic development have gradually changed from a ‘complete mismatch’ to a ‘relative mismatch’, the faster the economic growth rate in counties with approximately scarce water resources. Deng et al. (2020) used a grey correlation model to calculate the drivers of water use structure evolution. This suggests that population growth, urban expansion, and ecological changes are important drivers of water use structures. In summary, previous studies have lacked continuous analysis of time trends between water resources and environmental quality. Most scholars analysed the relationship between water resources and the economy at the macro level, with little research on specific parameters and their critical ranges, which led to unclear approaches in policy recommendations. Therefore, it is difficult to apply the results of these studies to specific plans. This study breaks away from the traditional broad policy recommendations and clearly indicates the critical factors and specific values to solve the problem.

In this study, we aim to analyze the spatial and temporal patterns of water resources and economic growth based on basic data from 16 districts (counties) of Zhangjiakou City between 2006 and 2015, using the Tapio decoupling model to quantitatively evaluate the decoupling relationship between water resources and economic growth. We used the LMDI model and mathematical and statistical analysis methods to identify the key factors affecting the decoupling relationship between water resources and economic growth. Finally, in order to address water resources that limit economic growth, we can increase mechanized agricultural inputs.

Study area

Zhangjiakou City (113°50′–116°30′E, 39°30′–42°10′N) is located in north-western Hebei province, with a total area of approximately 3.68 × 104 km2. The topography is high in the northwest and low in the southeast, with the Yinshan mountain range dividing the city into the Bashang and Baxia regions. The Bashang District includes Zhangbei, Kangbao, Guyuan, and Shangyi counties, while the Baxia District includes Qiaodong, Qiaoxi, Xuanhua, Xiahuayuan, Wanquan, Chongli, Yuxian, Yangyuan, Huai'an, Huailai, Zhuolu, and Chicheng counties (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Administrative division of Zhangjiakou City.

Figure 1

Administrative division of Zhangjiakou City.

Close modal

Zhangjiakou has a temperate continental monsoon climate, with an average altitude of approximately 1,200 m above sea level, a total multi-year average water resource of approximately 1.390 billion m3, and a multi-year average per capita water resource of 321.69 m3/person, which classifies the region as a severe water shortage area according to the 500 m3 severe water shortage line established by the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development. At the same time, Zhangjiakou is also a base for the protection of green agricultural and sideline products in Beijing and Tianjin. More than half of Beijing's vegetable supply comes from Zhangjiakou in summer. There is a total of 4.69 million people, with an annual GDP of 136.3 billion yuan and a per capita GDP of 30,840 yuan, compared to national and Beijing GDP per capita of 49,229 and 106,497 yuan, respectively, in the same period, almost two-thirds of the national average and one-thirds of the Beijing average. According to the income grouping criteria published by the World Bank, Zhangjiakou City was classified as an upper-middle-income region in 2015. The extreme scarcity of water resources and economic laxity are the main characteristics of Zhangjiakou, which is dominated by agriculture.

Research methods and data

This study used water resources ecological footprint, LMDI, and mathematical statistics method. The water resources ecological footprint model was applied to analyse and evaluate the status of water resources in Zhangjiakou. Meanwhile, economic data of Zhangjiakou districts and counties were collected, and the Tapio decoupling model was applied to evaluate the association between water resources and the economy in Zhangjiakou. The LMDI model and mathematical statistics model were used to identify the key factors. The data for this study were obtained from the Zhangjiakou City Water Resources Bulletin and the Zhangjiakou City Economic Yearbook from 2006 to 2015. To avoid data errors caused by inflation, the economic yearbook data were processed using the deflator method to eliminate errors.

Water resource ecological footprint model

The ecological footprint of water resources is used to convert the amount of water resources consumed by a region into the corresponding land area and equalize it to obtain a comparable equilibrium value for different regions. This equilibrium value can accurately quantify the sustainable utilization of regional water resources (Huang et al. 2008). The calculation formula is given as follows:
formula
(1)
where WEF is the water resource ecological footprint (hm2), N is the population, ef is the water resource ecological footprint (hm2/capita), and is the equivalence factor of the water resources. According to WWF-2002, = 5.19, W is the total water consumption (m3), and Pw is the global average production capacity of water resources (m3/hm2), Pw = 3,140 m3/hm2.
The ecological carrying capacity of water resources can quantify the maximum supporting capacity of water resources for the sustainable development of resources, the environment, and society in a certain period of the historical development of a region. At least 60% of the ecological carrying capacity of the water resources in a country or region must be deducted to maintain the ecological environment (Huang et al. 2008). The formula can be expressed as follows:
formula
(2)
where WEC is the water resources ecological carrying capacity (hm2), N is the population, ec is water resources ecological carrying capacity (hm2/capita), is the equivalence factor of water resources, ψ is the yield factor of water, Q is total water resources (m3), and Pw is the global average production capacity of water resources (m3/hm2).

ψ is the ratio of the average production capacity of water resources in a region to the average production capacity of world water resources. . ν is water volume per unit area in Zhangjiakou, νg is the global water per unit area. Based on the calculations, Zhangjiakou City's yield factor of water was 0.12.

Tapio decoupling model

The Tapio decoupling method is used to quantitatively evaluate the trend of water resources and economic growth and to establish an elastic analysis model of the water resource ecological footprint and economic change (Tapio 2005).
formula
(3)
where e is the elasticity, ΔWEF is the change rate of the water resource ecological footprint, ΔE is the change rate of regional economic growth, WEFt and WEFt−1 are the water resource ecological footprints of year t and year t − 1, respectively, and GDPt and GDPt−1 are the gross regional products of year t and year t − 1, respectively. According to Tapio's standard, the elastic coefficient ‘e’ can be divided into eight cases (Table 1).
Table 1

Classification of the decoupling state of water resources ecological footprint and economic growth

Decoupling stateΔEΔWEFeStatus description
Strong decoupling Raise (+) Reduce (−) e < 0  
Weak decoupling Raise (+) Raise (+) 0 ≤ e < 0.8 Economic growth rate > water resource growth rate 
Expansive coupling Raise (+) Raise (+) 0.8 ≤ e < 1.2 Economic growth rate ≈ water resource growth rate 
Expansive negative decoupling Raise (+) Raise (+) e > 1.2 Economic growth rate < water resource growth rate 
Strong negative decoupling Reduce (−) Raise (+) e < 0  
Weak negative decoupling Reduce (−) Reduce (−) 0 ≤ e < 0.8 Economic recession rate > water resource reduction rate 
Recessive coupling Reduce (−) Reduce (−) 0.8 ≤ e < 1.2 Economic recession rate ≈ water resource reduction rate 
Recessive decoupling Reduce (−) Reduce (−) e > 1.2 Economic recession rate < water resource reduction rate 
Decoupling stateΔEΔWEFeStatus description
Strong decoupling Raise (+) Reduce (−) e < 0  
Weak decoupling Raise (+) Raise (+) 0 ≤ e < 0.8 Economic growth rate > water resource growth rate 
Expansive coupling Raise (+) Raise (+) 0.8 ≤ e < 1.2 Economic growth rate ≈ water resource growth rate 
Expansive negative decoupling Raise (+) Raise (+) e > 1.2 Economic growth rate < water resource growth rate 
Strong negative decoupling Reduce (−) Raise (+) e < 0  
Weak negative decoupling Reduce (−) Reduce (−) 0 ≤ e < 0.8 Economic recession rate > water resource reduction rate 
Recessive coupling Reduce (−) Reduce (−) 0.8 ≤ e < 1.2 Economic recession rate ≈ water resource reduction rate 
Recessive decoupling Reduce (−) Reduce (−) e > 1.2 Economic recession rate < water resource reduction rate 

LMDI model

The LMDI decomposition model was used to analyse the key factors that affect the decoupling between water resources and economic development among the four factors of water use structure, technological improvement, economic scale, and resident population. The calculation formula is given as follows:
formula
(4)
where WEFi is the water resource ecological footprint (hm2) of the industry and G is the gross domestic product. P is the population (104) of the region. The above formula can be rewritten as:
formula
(5)
where Si represents the structural effect, T represents the technology effect, E represents the economic effect, and P represents the population effect.
formula
(6)
formula
(7)
formula
(8)
formula
(9)
formula
(10)
where ΔWEFS, ΔWEFT, ΔWEFE, and ΔWEFP refer to the degree of influence of four factors, namely water structure, technological improvement, economic scale, and permanent population on the change in the water resource ecological footprint.

Mathematical statistical analysis method

Pearson's correlation analysis is an important statistical method. This method measures the correlation between variables by calculating the product–moment correlation coefficients of the two variables. The value range of the correlation coefficient was [−1,1]. Based on the data of the Zhangjiakou City Economic Yearbook, this study conducts a Pearson correlation analysis on the indicators between the water resources subsystem and the economic and social subsystems, and quantitatively discusses the correlation between the indicators of different subsystems. Taking variables Xi and Yi as examples (i = 1, 2,…, n), the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated as follows:
formula
(11)
where r is the correlation coefficient, and the value range is [−1,1]; the higher the absolute value, the higher the correlation.

Water resources ecological pressure index

The water resources ecological pressure index reflects the relationship between the water resource ecological footprint and water resources' ecological carrying capacity. To quantify the ecological pressure of regional water resources (Tan & Zhen 2009), the calculation formula is:
formula
(12)
where EPIw is the ecological pressure index of the water resource. When 0 < EPIw < 1, the total amount of water resources is greater than the consumption, showing an ecological surplus; When EPIw = 1, the supply and demand of water resources are balanced, showing ecological balance; and When EPIw > 1, the water resource consumption is greater than the total regional water resources, showing an ecological deficit.

Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint, economic growth rate, and their influencing factors

Temporal and spatial change characteristics of Zhangjiakou city and district (county) water resource ecological footprint

As shown in Figure 2, the total Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint showed a significant downward trend from 2006 to 2015 (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with a decline of 17.31% in 2015 compared to 2006. During the study period, the Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint included three types: agricultural ecological footprint, industrial ecological footprint, and ecological footprint of the tertiary industry. The agricultural ecological footprint accounted for the largest proportion (76.04 ± 1.40%), followed by the industrial ecological footprint (13.22 ± 1.75%), and the ecological footprint of the tertiary industry accounted for the lowest proportion (10.74% ± 2.03%). During the study period, the agricultural ecological footprint and industrial water use showed a significant downward trend, with a decline rate of 17.27 and 42.12%, respectively. The ecological footprint of tertiary industrial water use showed a significant upward trend, with a rising rate of 21.18%.
Figure 2

The water resource ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Figure 2

The water resource ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 3, the spatial difference in the water resource ecological footprint of Zhangjiakou was significant (ANOVA, P < 0.05). The water resource ecological footprint in Xuanhua District was 3,285 ± 36,000 hm2, which was significantly higher than that in other districts and counties. The water resource ecological footprints in Xiahuayuan and Qiaoxi Districts were 1.24 ± 0.33 and 1.60 ± 0.99 million hm2, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in other districts and counties. The Xuanhua District water resource ecological footprint includes the agricultural water ecological footprint (51.50 ± 5.47%), the industrial water ecological footprint (34.58 ± 2.88%), and the ecological footprint of the tertiary industry (13.92 ± 3.24%). Except for Qiaoxi, where the ecological footprint of the tertiary sector is dominant (42.66 ± 33.83%), the other districts and counties are dominated by the agricultural ecological footprint (77.54 ± 14.35%).
Figure 3

Spatial distribution characteristics of water resource ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou districts and counties.

Figure 3

Spatial distribution characteristics of water resource ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou districts and counties.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 4, it shows an ecological deficit in Zhangjiakou. Considering Zhangjiakou as a whole, the ecological carrying capacity of water resources fluctuated between 906 and 135,000 hm2 from 2006 to 2015 (ANOVA, P > 0.05). The EPIw in Zhangjiakou City fluctuated between 12.53 and 20.81. According to the EPIw standards, the consumption of water resources was greater than the total amount of water resources in Zhangjiakou during the study period.
Figure 4

The water resources carrying capacity and EPIw in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Figure 4

The water resources carrying capacity and EPIw in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 5, during the study period, there was a significant difference in the water resources ecological carrying capacity and EPIw among districts and counties in Zhangjiakou (ANOVA, P < 0.05). among which Xuanhua District and Kangbao County had significantly higher EPIw than other districts and counties, Chicheng, Guyuan County, and Qiaodong, Qiaoxi District had slightly lower EPIw than those in other districts and counties, Yuxian, Huai'an, and Chongli County in the middle. The water resource's ecological carrying capacity in Chicheng and Kangbao counties was significantly higher and lower than the other districts and counties, respectively.
Figure 5

Annual average water resources ecological footprint, water resources ecological carrying capacity, and EPIw in Zhangjiakou districts and counties.

Figure 5

Annual average water resources ecological footprint, water resources ecological carrying capacity, and EPIw in Zhangjiakou districts and counties.

Close modal

Temporal and spatial change law of economic growth rate of Zhangjiakou city and district (county)

As shown in Figure 6, the overall GDP of Zhangjiakou showed a significant upward trend from 2006 to 2015 (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with an increase of 132.32% in 2015 compared with 2006 (Figure 6). Zhangjiakou's GDP during the study period consisted of three types of GDP: agricultural, industrial, and tertiary sectors, and all showed a significant upward trend, with industrial GDP (42.75 ± 1.59%) and tertiary industry GDP (40.29 ± 1.05%) being significantly larger than agricultural GDP (16.54 ± 1.03%).
Figure 6

Changes in Zhangjiakou's GDP and sectors from 2006 to 2015.

Figure 6

Changes in Zhangjiakou's GDP and sectors from 2006 to 2015.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 7, the spatial differences in GDP among the districts and counties of Zhangjiakou during the study period were significant (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with Xuanhua and Qiaodong Districts having a significantly larger GDP of 13.290 ± 17.76 and 10.989 ± 3.243 billion yuan, respectively, than the other districts and counties. Xiahuayuan District had a significantly lower GDP of 1.441 ± 168 billion yuan compared to other districts and counties. The GDP of Guyuan, Kangbao, and Shangyi counties was dominated by the output value of agricultural production (40.49 ± 5.23%). The GDP of Xuanhua, Qiaodong District, and Chongli County was dominated by industrial GDP (51.03 ± 6.87%), while that of the other districts and counties was dominated by the tertiary industry GDP (53.86 ± 12.99%).
Figure 7

Spatial distribution characteristics of GDP by districts and counties in Zhangjiakou.

Figure 7

Spatial distribution characteristics of GDP by districts and counties in Zhangjiakou.

Close modal

Spatial and temporal patterns in the water resource ecological footprint and factors influencing economic growth in Zhangjiakou city and its districts (counties)

We select three major categories and more than 30 subcategories of data, including agriculture, industry, and services. After excluding some irrelevant indicators by statistical analysis, the following results were obtained. As shown in Figure 8, the number of water-saving irrigation machines in Zhangjiakou showed a significant upward trend from 2006 to 2015 (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with a 2.52-fold increase in 2015 compared to 2006. The minimum number of water-saving irrigation machinery in Zhangjiakou during the study period occurred in 2007 and 2008, at 773 sets, followed by a year-on-year increase in the number of water-saving irrigation machinery. The total power of agricultural machinery, agricultural water pumps, and year-end electromechanical wells increased by 70.21, 5.86, and 81.39%, respectively, in 2015 compared to 2006.
Figure 8

Annual change law of factors affecting agricultural ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou from 2006 to 2015.

Figure 8

Annual change law of factors affecting agricultural ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou from 2006 to 2015.

Close modal
As shown in Figures 911, the spatial differences in the number of water-saving irrigation machinery, agricultural water pumps, and end-year electromechanical wells were significant in Zhangjiakou during the study period (ANOVA, P < 0.05). The number of water-saving irrigation machinery in Zhangbei County (990.80 ± 764.49 sets) and Guyuan County (746.50 ± 800.17 sets) is significantly larger than in other districts and counties (Figure 9); the number of agricultural water pumps in Zhangbei County (3,206.60 ± 467.45 sets) and Kangbao County (2,462.80 ± 1,029.40 sets) were significantly larger than the other districts and counties (Figure 10); the number of year-end electromechanical wells in Guyuan County (5,426.40 ± 4,250.65 sets) and Kangbao County (3,223.50 ± 1,556.61 sets) was significantly larger than the other districts and counties (Figure 11); the number of water-saving irrigation machinery, agricultural water pumps, and year-end electromechanical wells in Qiaoxi and Xianyuan Districts were all were much lower than those in other districts and counties.
Figure 9

Spatial distribution characteristics of annual average water-saving irrigation machinery in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Figure 9

Spatial distribution characteristics of annual average water-saving irrigation machinery in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Close modal
Figure 10

Spatial distribution characteristics of agricultural water pumps in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Figure 10

Spatial distribution characteristics of agricultural water pumps in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Close modal
Figure 11

Spatial distribution characteristics of year-end electromechanical wells in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Figure 11

Spatial distribution characteristics of year-end electromechanical wells in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 12, the use of plastic film and mulch for agricultural use in Zhangjiakou showed a significant upward trend from 2006 to 2015 (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with an increase of 37.81 and 21.85% in 2015 compared with 2006. In contrast, the area covered by mulch decreased slightly before rapidly increasing between 2009 and 2012.
Figure 12

Changes in agricultural plastic film in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Figure 12

Changes in agricultural plastic film in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 13, the total industrialized operations in Zhangjiakou showed a significant upward trend from 2006 to 2015 (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with a 3.57-fold increase in 2015 compared to 2006, with 2014 being the largest year for total industrialized operations. The industrialization rate in Zhangjiakou has increased by 15.72% over 10 years.
Figure 13

Changes in industrial operations in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Figure 13

Changes in industrial operations in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 14, the overall trend of industrial water withdrawal in Zhangjiakou from 2006 to 2015 was significantly increasing (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with a 51.28% increase in 2015 compared with 2006. The amount of water abstracted by Zhangjiakou's industry during the study period includes 12 types of metallurgy, electricity, chemicals, light industry, and machinery, with metallurgy, coal, and non-ferrous metal industries showing an upward trend in water abstraction, and the remaining nine types of industries showing a downward trend. Water withdrawals from the metallurgical industry (24.86 ± 7.12%) and the electric power industry (33.35 ± 6.71%) were significantly greater than those from other industries.
Figure 14

Changes in industrial water intake and sectors in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2013.

Figure 14

Changes in industrial water intake and sectors in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2013.

Close modal
As shown in Figures 15 and 16, the number of tourists visiting Zhangjiakou showed a significant upward trend from 2006 to 2015 (ANOVA, P < 0.05), with a 6.27-fold increase in 2015 compared with 2006 (Figure 15). During the study period, there were significant spatial differences (ANOVA, P < 0.05) in the number of tourists in each district and county of Zhangjiakou, with Xuanhua District having the highest number of tourists at 3,830,100 ± 4,890,700 and Shangyi County having the lowest number of tourists at 118,300 ± 9,500 (Figure 16).
Figure 15

Changes in the number of tourists in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Figure 15

Changes in the number of tourists in Zhangjiakou during 2006–2015.

Close modal
Figure 16

Spatial distribution characteristics of the number of tourists in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Figure 16

Spatial distribution characteristics of the number of tourists in Zhangjiakou district and county.

Close modal

In summary, on the time scale, the number of water-saving irrigation machines, the total power of agricultural machinery, agricultural water pumps, agricultural plastic film use, mulch use, total industrialized operation, industrialization rate, and tourism numbers all show a significant upward trend concerning water resource ecological footprint and an opposite trend to GDP.

Temporal and spatial changes of decoupling effect of Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint economic growth

Temporal change rule of decoupling effect between water resource ecological footprint and social economy in Zhangjiakou city and its districts (counties)

The decoupled state can clarify the relationship between the ecological footprint of water resources and the economy, allowing further exploration of the mechanisms that cause changes in the decoupled state. As shown in Figure 17, taking Zhangjiakou as a whole, the water resource ecological footprint showed a significant downward trend, with an annual decline rate of 2.06 ± 2.67% from 2006 to 2015; GDP showed a linear upward trend, with an average annual growth rate of 9.86 ± 3.00%. According to the decoupling criteria defined by Tapio, Zhangjiakou's water resource ecological footprint and economic growth were decoupled, except for 2006–2007 and 2010–2011, when they were weakly decoupled, and all other study periods when they were strongly decoupled, indicating a significant reduction in water consumption and that water resources are no longer a limiting factor for Zhangjiakou's economic growth. This indicates that water resources are no longer a limiting factor for the economic growth of Zhangjiakou.
Figure 17

Evaluation of decoupling between Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint and economic growth from 2006 to 2015.

Figure 17

Evaluation of decoupling between Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint and economic growth from 2006 to 2015.

Close modal

Spatial change law of decoupling effect between water resource ecological footprint and social economy in Zhangjiakou city and its districts (counties)

As shown in Table 2, the decoupling states of Zhangjiakou districts and counties during the study period were significantly different: (1) Guyuan, Zhangbei, Shangyi, Huai'an, Huailai, Chicheng, Wanquan District, and Kangbao counties showed strong decoupling in general; specifically, five districts and counties, namely Zhangbei, Shangyi, Huailai, Chicheng counties, and Wanquan District, showed strong decoupling from 2006 to 2009, from 2010 to 2012, and from 2013 to 2015. The decoupling states of Zhangbei, Shangyi, Huailai, Chicheng, and Wanquan counties from 2006 to 2009, 2010 to 2012, and 2013 to 2015 are all strongly decoupled, which shows a decrease in the ecological footprint of water resources but an increase in socioeconomic development. In Guyuan and Huai'an counties, there was only one weak decoupling from 2010 to 2012, which was a strong–weak–strong decoupling in that order. Kangbao County experienced expansive negative decoupling from 2006 to 2009, and then quickly adjusted to strong decoupling from 2010 to 2012 and 2013 to 2015. (2) The decoupling states of Zhuolu, YangYuan, and Kangbao counties vary between strong, weak, and weak decoupling. Zhuolu, YangYuan, and Kangbao counties changed from strong to weak decoupling. Kangbao County was in expansive negative decoupling from 2006 to 2009 and strong decoupling from 2010 to 2015, while Zhuolu County was in strong decoupling from 2006 to 2009 and weak decoupling from 2010 to 2015. (3) Six districts, namely Yuxian, Qiaodong, Qiaoxi, Xuanhua, Xiahuayuan, and Chongli, showed strong decoupling and weak decoupling from 2006 to 2012, and recessive decoupling and strong negative decoupling from 2013 to 2015. Specifically, after two strong decouplings, Xuanhua District experienced a strong negative decoupling from 2013 to 2015, showing an increase in the ecological footprint of water resources but a regression in socioeconomics, which is the worst of all decouplings. Weak decoupling and strong decoupling are consistent, with weak decoupling and strong decoupling followed by a ‘Recessive’ state from 2013 to 2015. The recessive decoupling shows that the ecological footprint of water resources decreases at a faster rate than socioeconomic decline. Recessive coupling means that the ecological footprint of water resources is decreasing at a rate approximately equal to the rate of socioeconomic decline. Qiaodong and Qiaoxi Districts have undergone strong decoupling–expansive negative decoupling–strong decoupling, and the decoupling state was worse from 2010 to 2012, showing that the ecological footprint of water resources is increasing faster than the socioeconomic increase. The ecological footprint of water resources is increasing faster than the socioeconomic growth rate, which is a rough development mode of exchanging resources for development.

Table 2

Results of decoupling between water resource ecological footprint and economic growth in Zhangjiakou districts (counties) from 2006 to 2015

Region06–0910–1213–15
Decoupling stateDecoupling stateDecoupling state
Guyuan County Strong decoupling Weak decoupling Strong decoupling 
Zhangbei County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Shangyi County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Kangbao County Expansive negative decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Huai'an County Strong decoupling Weak decoupling Strong decoupling 
Yangyuan County Weak decoupling Weak decoupling Weak decoupling 
Yuxian County Weak decoupling Strong decoupling Recessive decoupling 
Huailai County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Zhuolu County Strong decoupling Weak decoupling Weak decoupling 
Chicheng County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Qiaoxi District Strong decoupling Expansive negative decoupling Strong decoupling 
Qiaodong District Strong decoupling Expansive negative decoupling Strong decoupling 
Xuanhua District Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong negative decoupling 
Wanquan District Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Xiahuayuan District Expansive coupling Expansive negative decoupling Recessive decoupling 
Chongli District Weak decoupling Strong decoupling Recessive coupling 
Region06–0910–1213–15
Decoupling stateDecoupling stateDecoupling state
Guyuan County Strong decoupling Weak decoupling Strong decoupling 
Zhangbei County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Shangyi County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Kangbao County Expansive negative decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Huai'an County Strong decoupling Weak decoupling Strong decoupling 
Yangyuan County Weak decoupling Weak decoupling Weak decoupling 
Yuxian County Weak decoupling Strong decoupling Recessive decoupling 
Huailai County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Zhuolu County Strong decoupling Weak decoupling Weak decoupling 
Chicheng County Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Qiaoxi District Strong decoupling Expansive negative decoupling Strong decoupling 
Qiaodong District Strong decoupling Expansive negative decoupling Strong decoupling 
Xuanhua District Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong negative decoupling 
Wanquan District Strong decoupling Strong decoupling Strong decoupling 
Xiahuayuan District Expansive coupling Expansive negative decoupling Recessive decoupling 
Chongli District Weak decoupling Strong decoupling Recessive coupling 

Analysis of factors influencing the decoupling relationship between Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint and economic growth

Differentiation and analysis of types of factors affecting the decoupling relationship between Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint and economic growth

As shown in Figure 18, according to the Tapio decoupling model, decoupling is implied by a decrease in the ecological footprint of water resources when the economy increases. Zhangjiakou's overall GDP has been increasing, and the factors that drive the reduction in the water resource ecological footprint are the drivers of the decoupling of water resources from the economy. The water resource ecological footprint is influenced by technological, structural, economic, and population effects. Using the LMDI model to identify the factors affecting the water resource ecological footprint and economic growth in Zhangjiakou, the results of the study show that the technology effect is always negative, with a cumulative effect of −1.818 million hm2; the structural effect has a cumulative effect of −1.173 million hm2; and the economic and population effects are always positive, with a cumulative effect of 1.394 million hm2 and 99,000 hm2, respectively. In accordance with the Divisia decomposition method, the results show that the technology effect is the main factor that reduces the water resource ecological footprint, with a decreasing trend at an average annual rate of 21,000 hm2 from 2006 to 2010 and an increasing trend at an average annual rate of 31,000 hm2 from 2010 to 2015; the increase in the size of the economy leads to an increase in the water footprint. There was a brief fluctuation in the population effect in 2010 due to the increase in the water resource ecological footprint caused by the population effect in the area below the dam. Compared to the dampening effect of the technology effect and the boosting effect of the economic effect, the structural and population effects have had little effect on the reduction of the water resource ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou.
Figure 18

Decomposition effect of Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint change from 2006 to 2015.

Figure 18

Decomposition effect of Zhangjiakou water resource ecological footprint change from 2006 to 2015.

Close modal

Comparing the four factors, in order of the contribution of the water-saving effect: technology effect > structure effect > population effect > economic effect. The total effect of the water resource ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou from 2006 to 2015 showed a negative value, as the inhibiting effect of the technological and structural effects on the increase in the water resource ecological footprint was greater than the contributing effect of the economic and population effects.

Screening factors influencing the decoupling relationship between the water resource ecological footprint and economic growth in Zhangjiakou

Table 3 shows the results of the correlation analysis of the specific factors influencing the water resource ecological footprint and technology efficiency effects in each district and county of Zhangjiakou during the study period: the total power of agricultural machinery, agricultural water pumps, water-saving irrigation machinery, number of electromechanical wells at the end of the year, the total number of industrialized operations, industrialization rate, and number of tourist arrivals in the city had a significant negative correlation with the water resource ecological footprint and contributed to the reduction of the water resource ecological footprint. The light industry and machinery are positively correlated with the water resource ecological footprint, while tobacco and textiles are significantly positively correlated with the water resource ecological footprint, indicating that the light industry, machinery, tobacco, and textile sectors have a dampening effect on the reduction of the water resource ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou.

Table 3

Zhangjiakou city water resources ecological footprint-related analysis results

Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficientCorrelation coefficient
Total power of agricultural machinery −0.883** Electric power 0.564 Electronics −0.186 
Agricultural water pump −0.795** Chemical industry 0.559 Number of urban tourists −0.933** 
Water-saving irrigation machinery −0.915** Light industry 0.797*   
Year-end electromechanical well −0.845** Machinery 0.745*   
Agricultural plastic film −0.489 Coal −0.39   
Amount of plastic film used −0.473 Non-ferrous materials −0.183   
Plastic film coverage area −0.381 Building materials 0.296   
Total industrialized operation −0.943** Medicine 0.558   
Industrialization rate −0.916** Tobacco 0.907**   
Metallurgy −0.211 Textile 0.865**   
Correlation coefficientCorrelation coefficientCorrelation coefficient
Total power of agricultural machinery −0.883** Electric power 0.564 Electronics −0.186 
Agricultural water pump −0.795** Chemical industry 0.559 Number of urban tourists −0.933** 
Water-saving irrigation machinery −0.915** Light industry 0.797*   
Year-end electromechanical well −0.845** Machinery 0.745*   
Agricultural plastic film −0.489 Coal −0.39   
Amount of plastic film used −0.473 Non-ferrous materials −0.183   
Plastic film coverage area −0.381 Building materials 0.296   
Total industrialized operation −0.943** Medicine 0.558   
Industrialization rate −0.916** Tobacco 0.907**   
Metallurgy −0.211 Textile 0.865**   

**Significant correlation at 0.01 level (two-tailed).

*At 0.05 level (two-tailed), correlation is significant.

As shown in Table 4, the water resource ecological footprints in Shangyi County and Chongli District showed a significant negative correlation with the number of tourists, agricultural water pumps, water-saving irrigation machinery, and year-end electromechanical wells. The water resource ecological footprint in the Qiaodong District showed a significant positive correlation with agricultural water pumps.

Table 4

Correlation analysis of ecological footprint of water resources in Zhangjiakou districts and counties

Water resource ecological footprint by district and countyNumber of people travellingAgricultural water pumpWater-saving irrigation machineryYear-end electromechanical well
Qiaodong District 0.037 0.804** −0.950** 0.796** 
Qiaoxi District −0.257 0.002 0.765** 0.185 
Xuanhua District −0.769** −0.668* 0.088 −0.850** 
Xiahuayuan District −0.414 0.089 .a 0.256 
Zhangbei County −0.960** −0.959** −0.923** −0.347 
Kangbao County −0.793** −0.146 −0.557 −0.744* 
Guyuan County 0.032 −0.018 0.112 0.116 
Shangyi County −0.851** −0.894** −0.835** −0.776** 
Yuxian County −0.875** −0.501 −0.801** −0.790** 
YangYuan County −0.173 −0.312 −0.222 −0.256 
Huai'an County 0.279 0.265 0.286 0.277 
Wanquan District −0.714* 0.384 0.172 −0.243 
Huailai County −0.935** −0.654* −0.921** −0.809** 
Zhuolu County −0.506 −0.656* −0.734* 0.47 
Chicheng County 0.355 −0.072 0.004 0.374 
Chongli District −0.855** −0.945** −0.744* −0.706* 
Water resource ecological footprint by district and countyNumber of people travellingAgricultural water pumpWater-saving irrigation machineryYear-end electromechanical well
Qiaodong District 0.037 0.804** −0.950** 0.796** 
Qiaoxi District −0.257 0.002 0.765** 0.185 
Xuanhua District −0.769** −0.668* 0.088 −0.850** 
Xiahuayuan District −0.414 0.089 .a 0.256 
Zhangbei County −0.960** −0.959** −0.923** −0.347 
Kangbao County −0.793** −0.146 −0.557 −0.744* 
Guyuan County 0.032 −0.018 0.112 0.116 
Shangyi County −0.851** −0.894** −0.835** −0.776** 
Yuxian County −0.875** −0.501 −0.801** −0.790** 
YangYuan County −0.173 −0.312 −0.222 −0.256 
Huai'an County 0.279 0.265 0.286 0.277 
Wanquan District −0.714* 0.384 0.172 −0.243 
Huailai County −0.935** −0.654* −0.921** −0.809** 
Zhuolu County −0.506 −0.656* −0.734* 0.47 
Chicheng County 0.355 −0.072 0.004 0.374 
Chongli District −0.855** −0.945** −0.744* −0.706* 

**Significant correlation at 0.01 level (two-tailed).

*At 0.05 level (two-tailed), correlation is significant.

.a Data value is 0 and cannot be calculated.

As shown in Figure 19, Figure 20, Table 5 and Table 6, the results of the regression analysis of the total power of agricultural machinery and water-saving irrigation machinery influencing factors and the ecological water footprint of water resources: water resource ecological footprint = 0.003 water-saving irrigation machinery − 0.132 total power of agricultural machinery + 221.79 (Table 6). The fit of the regression model was adjusted to R2 = 0.933, and P < 0.05 passed the test (Table 5). Agriculture was the major water user in Zhangjiakou (76.04 ± 1.40%), and the water resource ecological footprint showed a significant downward trend when the number of water-saving irrigation machinery and the total power of agricultural machinery increased. This suggests that by increasing the number of agricultural machinery and non-engineering means, the local ecological water footprint and economic growth in Zhangjiakou City can be promoted to maintain a strong decoupling relationship, effectively addressing the issues of water scarcity and economic growth.
Table 5

Results of multiple linear regression calculations

ModelRR2Adjusted R2Error in standard estimationDurbin–Watson
0.966 0.933 0.914 3.548975185 1.54 
ModelRR2Adjusted R2Error in standard estimationDurbin–Watson
0.966 0.933 0.914 3.548975185 1.54 

Predictor variables: (constant), water-saving irrigation machinery, and total power of agricultural machinery.

Dependent variable: water resource ecological footprint.

Table 6

Results of multiple linear regression calculations

Unstandardised factor
tSignificanceVIF
BStandard errorsStandardisation factor BetaCovariance statistics Tolerance
(Constant) 221.789 10.421  21.282   
 Total power of agricultural machinery −0.132 0.004 −0.458 −3.179 0.016 0.46 2.173 
 Water-saving irrigation machinery −0.003 0.001 −0.578 −4.006 0.005 0.46 2.173 
Unstandardised factor
tSignificanceVIF
BStandard errorsStandardisation factor BetaCovariance statistics Tolerance
(Constant) 221.789 10.421  21.282   
 Total power of agricultural machinery −0.132 0.004 −0.458 −3.179 0.016 0.46 2.173 
 Water-saving irrigation machinery −0.003 0.001 −0.578 −4.006 0.005 0.46 2.173 

Dependent variable: water resource ecological footprint.

Figure 19

Total power of agricultural machinery and agricultural water consumption.

Figure 19

Total power of agricultural machinery and agricultural water consumption.

Close modal
Figure 20

Water-saving irrigation machinery and agricultural water.

Figure 20

Water-saving irrigation machinery and agricultural water.

Close modal

In summary, analysing the trends of different indicators for agriculture, industry, and services, and incorporating the decoupling of the water resources ecological footprint from the economy in Zhangjiakou. Calculating and identifying the key factors affecting the ecological footprint of water resources and the economy in Zhangjiakou. The results show that the total power of agricultural machinery, agricultural water pumps, water-saving irrigation machinery, number of electromechanical wells at the end of the year, total industrialized operations, industrialization rate, and number of urban tourists are significantly negatively correlated with the water resources ecological footprint. The total power of agricultural machinery and water-saving irrigation machinery have a linear regression relationship with the water resources ecological footprint, and this equation is water resource ecological footprint = −0.003 water-saving irrigation machinery −0.132 total power of agricultural machinery +221.79.

Discussion

This paper aims to address the constraints of water scarcity on economic development, and finds that Zhangjiakou as a whole is strongly decoupled most of the time. The technology effect is the main factor that reduces the ecological footprint of water resources, and also is a key factor influencing the decoupling of the ecological footprint of water resources and economic growth in Zhangjiakou. The relationship between the total power of agricultural machinery, water-saving irrigation machinery, and the ecological footprint of water resources is linear. With the increase in the quantity of water-saving irrigation machinery and the total power of agricultural machinery, the ecological footprint of water resources decreased significantly.

Chang used the Tapio model to examine the performance of water utilization in 30 provinces of China. The result shows that the Northeastern provinces have largely increased the efficiency but the southwestern provinces have the efficiency declined (Chang & Zhu 2021). In regions such as Northwest China and along the Great Wall, machinery density is significantly negatively correlated with agroecological efficiency, while in Northeast China, machinery density is positively correlated with agroecological efficiency. Considering the characteristics of agricultural production in China and referring to previous research results, it illustrates that there is significant regional heterogeneity in the drivers of the evolution of agroecological efficiency in China. It is suggested that the Northwest and Great Wall regions should continue to strengthen agricultural infrastructure, improve agricultural water supply and drainage systems, and increase agricultural mechanization in the Northeast (Wang & Lin 2021). Also strengthening urban infrastructure can help improve regional economic development (Junaidi et al. 2022). The development of agricultural machinery and water-saving technology is the main method to improve agricultural water efficiency. Using agricultural machinery such as staggered vibratory subsoilers can loosen the soil, increase rainwater infiltration rates, and reduce runoff and water evaporation losses (Wang et al. 2019). Fang et al. (2017) applied the principal component analysis method to study irrigation water efficiency in different provinces of China, which showed that sophisticated irrigation management and water conservation measures influence irrigation water efficiency in highly developed agricultural provinces, making those factors strongly positive drivers. However, changes in irrigation water efficiency are mainly driven by economic development and structural adjustment in highly industrialized provinces, weakening those drivers. Zhai et al. (2021) conducted field trials from 2012 to 2015 and found that three 90 mm micro-sprinklers and four 120 mm water micro-sprinklers increased water use efficiency by 22.5 and 16.2%, respectively, compared to traditional flood irrigation. Solgi et al. (2022) in Iran used the AquaCrop model to study the effect of different surface deficit irrigation strategies on water use efficiency and wheat yield under five different climate scenarios. When irrigation water was reduced by 30%, agricultural water productivity (WP) increased by 0–18% during different growing seasons. Furthermore, sprinkler irrigation increased agricultural WP and maintained yields only in normal and wet years. Otherwise, sprinkler irrigation reduces agricultural WP and increases the pressure on the water sources. Therefore, synchronizing irrigation strategies with rainfall characteristics in areas with erratic rainfall will increase WP and maintain crop production. The Israeli government has invested heavily in research and development to make its agricultural water-saving irrigation technology and equipment superior while optimizing water allocation techniques and emphasizing agronomic and biological water-saving techniques (Trifonov et al. 2017).

This study uses LMDI and mathematical statistical analysis to find that the increase in water-saving irrigation machinery and the total power of farm machinery in Zhangjiakou led to a decrease in agricultural water use, similar to the results of Wang & Lin (2021). It could be that with the implementation of water conservation policies and the mechanization of agriculture to achieve large-scale agricultural operations, water-saving irrigation techniques are applied and popularized, increasing agricultural production while reducing the amount of water used for irrigation. By referring to the development experience of Israel, it is also important to focus on agronomic research and the development of more advanced water-saving techniques when increasing the number of water-saving irrigation machinery and the total power of agricultural machinery parameters.

To address water scarcity constraints on economic development. This study focuses on the decoupling relationship between water resources and economic development and its impact mechanisms in Zhangjiakou City. The analysis led to the following conclusions:

  1. The water resources ecological footprint in Zhangjiakou showed a significant decreasing trend, and there are obvious spatial differences in both the water resources ecological footprint and the economy. The agricultural ecological footprint was dominant in all districts and counties (77.54 ± 14.35%). The ecological footprint of water resources decreased by 17.31% from 2006 to 2015, Xuanhua District has the largest average annual water resources ecological footprint, while Xiahuayuan District has the smallest. Zhangjiakou's GDP showed a significant increasing trend (an increase of 1.32 times). Significant spatial variation in GDP. Most districts and counties were dominated by the tertiary sector, with the exception of Guyuan, Kangbao, Shangyi and Xuanhua, Qiaodong, and Chongli Districts. Meanwhile, the Xuanhua District had the largest average annual GDP and the Xiahuayuan District was the smallest.

  2. There was a strong decoupling between the ecological footprint of water resources and economic growth in Zhangjiakou between 2006 and 2015, and the decoupling status of different districts and counties was significantly different during the study period. This indicates that economic growth and water resource utilization coordinate development in most districts and counties, and water shortage is no longer a constraint to economic growth. Zhangbei, Shangyi, Huailai, Chicheng, and Wanquan Districts were strongly decoupled. Yu County, and Qiaodong, Qiaoxi, Xuanhua, Xiahuayuan, and Chongli Districts have a trend towards worse decoupling. There was strong and weak decoupling from 2006 to 2012, but the decoupling status declined from 2013 to 2015 with recessive decoupling and strong negative decoupling.

  3. The technology effect, which is always negative, was the key factor affecting the decoupling of the water resources ecological footprint and economic growth in Zhangjiakou, with the number of water-saving irrigation machines and the total power of agricultural machinery being the most critical influencing factors. Ranked by the contribution rate of reducing the ecological footprint of water resources: technology effect > structure effect > population effect > economic scale effect. According to the correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis, there exists a linear regression equation which is water resource ecological footprint = −0.003 water-saving irrigation machinery −0.132 total power of agricultural machinery +221.79.

Therefore, for water-scarce cities such as Zhangjiakou, which are predominantly agricultural, it is important to adjust the structure of water use, focus on agronomic research, and develop more advanced water-saving technologies. Specifically, agricultural machinery and water-saving irrigation machinery can be increased, which will effectively reduce water consumption. At the same time, the government should promote agricultural mechanization and large-scale farming, which will effectively alleviate the problem of water scarcity limiting economic development.

This research was funded by China Three Gorges Corporation (grant number HB/ZB2021156) and the National Science and Technology Major Project of Water Pollution Control and Treatment (grant number 2017ZX07101003-008).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Akbostancı
E.
,
Türüt-Aşık
S.
&
Tunç
G. İ
.
2009
The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve?
Energy Policy
37
(
3
),
861
867
.
Deng
O.
,
Li
Y. Q.
&
Lu
C. X.
2020
Spatio-temporal evolution analysis and underlying driving forces of water supply and consumption structures in Zhangjiakou, China
.
Pratac. Sci.
37
(
7
),
1354
1361
.
Han
Y.
,
Jia
S. F.
,
Lu
C. X.
&
Lyu
A. F.
2020
Spatiotemporal matching between water resources and social economy: a case study in Zhangjiakou
.
J. Nat. Resour.
35
(
6
),
1392
1401
.
Huang
L. N.
,
Zhang
W. X.
&
Jiang
C. L.
2008
Methodology for calculating the water resources ecological footprint
.
Acta Ecol. Sin.
28
(
03
),
1279
1286
.
Kambu
Z.
,
Jinca
M. Y.
,
Pallu
M. S.
&
Ramli
M. I.
2022
Meta synthesis of community participation model on Trans-Papua road development
.
Civ. Eng. J.
8
,
2476
2489
.
OECD
2002
Sustainable Development: Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure From Economic Growth
.
Tan
X. J.
&
Zhen
Q. Y.
2009
Ecological footprint analysis and forecasting of water resources
.
Acta Ecol. Sin.
29
(
07
),
3559
3568
.
Tian
Y.
,
Long
Z. Q.
&
Li
Q. G.
2023
What are the determinants of wastewater discharge reduction in China? Decomposition analysis by LMDI
.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
30
(
9
),
23538
23552
.
Wackernagel
M.
1999
An evaluation of the ecological footprint
.
Ecol. Econ.
31
(
3
),
317
318
.
Wang
S. Y.
&
Lin
Y. J.
2021
Spatial evolution and its drivers of regional agro-ecological efficiency in China's from the perspective of water footprint and gray water footprint
.
Sci. Geogr. Sin.
41
(
02
),
290
301
.
Wang
Y. X.
,
Osman
A. N.
,
Zhang
D. X.
,
Yang
L.
,
Cui
T.
&
Zhong
X. J.
2019
Optimized design and field experiment of a staggered vibrating subsoiler for conservation tillage
.
Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng.
12
(
1
),
59
65
.
Zhai
L. C.
,
Lu
L. H.
,
Dong
Z. Q.
,
Zhang
L. H.
,
Zhang
J. T.
,
Jia
X. L.
&
Zhang
Z. B.
2021
The water-saving potential of using micro-sprinkling irrigation for winter wheat production on the North China Plain
.
J. Integr. Agric.
20
(
6
),
1687
1700
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).