Membrane fouling is a serious handicap of membrane-based separation, as it reduces permeation flux and hence increases operational and maintenance expenses. Polyurethane–paraffin wax (PU/PW) nanocapsules were integrated into the polyethersulfone membrane to manufacture a composite membrane with higher antifouling and permeability performance against humic acid (HA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) foulants. All manufactured membranes were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectrometry (SEM-EDS), and contact angle. The contact angle of the pristine polyethersulfone (PES) membrane was measured 73.40 ± 1.32. With the embedding of nanocapsules, the contact angle decreased to 64.55 ± 1.23 for PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt%, and the pure water flux of all composite membranes increased when compared to pristine PES. The pristine PES membrane also has shown the lowest steady-state fluxes at 45.84 and 46.59 L/m2h for BSA and HA, respectively. With the increase of PU/PW nanocapsule ratio from 0.5 to 1.0 wt%, steady-state fluxes increased from 51.96 to 71.61 and from 67.87 to 98.73 L/m2h, respectively, for BSA and HA. The results depicted that BSA and HA rejection efficiencies of PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes increased when compared to pristine PES membranes.

  • Polyurethane–paraffin wax nanocapsules were integrated into the polyethersulfone membrane.

  • The contact angle decreased from 73.40 ± 1.32° to 64.55 ± 1.23° for PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt%.

  • BSA and HA rejection efficiencies of the PES/PU/PW 1.0% membrane increased from 93.95 to 100% and 98.78 to 100%, respectively.

Water scarcity and pollution have become a worldwide concern as a result of growing urbanization, industry, and technological advancements, posing a threat to the entire ecosystem and harming human health (Arenas-Sánchez et al. 2016). Membrane technology is still the most effective treatment and water recovery system, with the best prospects in wastewater applications, as compared to other physical, chemical, physicochemical, or biological treatment systems (Nasir et al. 2022). Sadly, the most significant disadvantage of membrane-based separation is membrane fouling, which decreases the permeation flux and hence raises operational and maintenance costs (Barambu et al. 2021; Li et al. 2021; Qiu et al. 2022). Therefore, the membrane surface needs to be modified in various ways to prevent the fouling mechanism.

Phase change materials (PCMs) with a crystalline structure are organic or inorganic compounds that can absorb and store energy as latent heat and release energy depending on temperature differences during the phase change process, melting and freezing, evaporation and condensation, or changes in the crystal structure (Jin et al. 2008; Atinafu et al. 2020; Yang et al. 2021). In addition to the chemical properties of latent heat storage PCMs such as non-toxic, non-corrosive, non-flammable, non-explosive, and chemically stable for a long time, physical (high density, low vapor pressure, and small volume changes at phase transitions), thermal (high thermal conductivity, high latent heat, and high specific heat), and kinetic properties (absence of subcooling and having a suitable crystallization rate) also draw attention (Shchukina et al. 2018; Vadhera et al. 2018; Rodríguez-Cumplido et al. 2019). Moreover, the low cost and abundance of PCMs are important factors in their applicability in a variety of fields (Vadhera et al. 2018). PCMs have the potential to be used in application areas like energy (Gupta et al. 2020; Faraj et al. 2021; Zhi et al. 2022), environment (Lamnatou et al. 2018; Dibene et al. 2020; Roy et al. 2021), textiles (Aitali et al. 2016; Lu et al. 2019; Saraç et al. 2019; AitAli et al. 2023), and medicine (Li et al. 2015, 2019) due to their phase transition temperatures and characteristics. PCMs are classified as organic, inorganic, or eutectic. Among them, paraffin, which is one of the organic PCMs, stands out with its important properties such as non-corrosive, chemically inert, low vapor pressure during the melting phase, and non-toxicity (Magendran et al. 2019; Ghasemi et al. 2022). However, paraffin's limited heat conductivity, absence of a stable melting point, and flammability limit their application possibilities. As a result, various solutions have been created, especially to solve the problem of low thermal conductivity, and the most common of these is the method of keeping paraffin in polymeric mesh such as polyurethane and polyethylene (Vasu et al. 2019; Nikpourian et al. 2020). Microencapsulation and nanoencapsulation methods applied for this purpose are used to eliminate the disadvantages of paraffin. PCMs coated by microencapsulation or nanoencapsulation methods are small core-shell particles coated with inorganic or polymer materials. The nanoencapsulation approach improves the microencapsulation method by reducing the surface-to-volume ratio by shrinking the capsule to nanoscale size. Thus, the heat transfer rate increases with the nano-encapsulated PCMs obtained from Zhang & Yuan (2020), Peng et al. (2021), and Cao et al. (2022). Abdeali et al. employed a polymerization procedure to generate nano-encapsulated paraffin wax core/polyurethane shell (PW/PU) and determined that the sonication time and reaction temperature had a good effect on thermal performance by creating narrow particle size distribution, according to the findings (Abdeali et al. 2021). The incorporation of PCMs into the UF membrane matrix can increase its thermal stability and improve its resistance to temperature variations. This can be particularly useful in applications where the temperature of the feed solution needs to be maintained within a narrow range, as the PCM can help to absorb or release thermal energy and prevent fluctuations in the feed solution temperature (Wang et al. 2014). In addition, the use of PCM-modified UF membranes can enhance the separation performance of the membrane. PCMs can reduce fouling and enhance the permeate flux by reducing the adhesion of foulants to the membrane surface, resulting in better membrane cleaning and longer membrane lifespan (Fakhry et al. 2022).

In this study, nano-encapsulated paraffin wax core/thermoplastic elastomer polyurethane shell (PW/PU) was synthesized by the mini-emulsion polymerization method. The synthesized PW/PU nanocapsules were characterized and validated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses. Confirmed by characterization methods, polyurethane–paraffin wax (PU/PW) nanocapsules were integrated into the polyethersulfone (PES) membrane to form a composite membrane with higher antifouling and permeability performance against humic acid (HA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) foulants. To the best of our knowledge, no studies on PES membranes modified with PU/PW nanocapsules have been reported in the literature.

Materials

Isophorone diisocyanate, polyethylene glycol (PEG6000), cyclohexanone, paraffin wax, 1-dodecanol, glycerol, sodium dodecyl sulfate (≥99.0%), polycaprolactone (MW: 10,000), and HA were purchased from Sigma Aldrich and used without additional purification. BASF Company (Germany) provided polyethersulfone (PES, Ultrason E6020P, MW: 58,000 g/mol). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and bovine serum albumin (BSA, MW: 66,000 g/mol) were supplied from Merck Company (Germany). All chemicals were analytical grade, and distilled water was obtained using a Millipore Direct-Q3UV purification system with two stages.

Synthesis of PU/PW nanocapsules

PU/PW nanocapsules were synthesized in accordance with the literature (Abdeali et al. 2021). In a typical synthesis of the PU/PW nanocapsules, 2 g of sodium dodecyl sulfate (0.006 mol) is first dissolved in 10 mL of deionized water under inert gas, and the organic phase containing 0.6 g of isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI), 0.1 g of paraffin wax, and 0.14 g of cyclohexanone (0.0014 mol) are mixed thoroughly in a separate beaker. Subsequently, both phases are brought together in an inert atmosphere and allowed to mix at 80 °C. The mixture was ultrasonicated for 15 min and 0.12 g of PEG6000 was added to the medium and mixed for 1 h. About 0.16 g of polycaprolactone and 0.16 g of glycerol were added to the medium, and the mixing was continued for another 3 h. After adding 0.3 g of 1-dodecanol (0.0016 mol) to the medium, PU/PW dispersion was filtered and washed through centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 15 min, several times) using hot deionized water and cyclohexanone. Finally, obtained PU/PW nanocapsules were freeze-dried in a vacuum. The zeta potential of PU/PW nanocapsules was determined using a zeta sizer (Malvern Zetasizer equipped with MPT-2 Titrator, Nano ZS). The samples were prepared using deionized water as a 0.1% solution, and the pH of the solution was adjusted to 7.0.

Preparation of neat and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes

The phase inversion method was used to manufacture the neat and PU/PW nanocapsules blended membranes. Before using the PES beads, they were dried at 80 °C in an oven for 2 h. To manufacture functionalized membranes, first, the different ratios of PU/PW nanocapsules (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 wt%) were added to DMSO solvent and dispersed for 15 min by using an ultrasonication bath, and PES beads were then added to this solution. The prepared solution was rapidly shaken at 60 °C for 6 h and after that at room temperature overnight then ultrasonicated for 20 min again to obtain a clear homogeneous solution and remove air bubbles from the casting solutions. When all bubbles were removed, casting solutions of PU/PW nanocapsules were spread on a glass plate with a casting knife gap setting of 200 μm at a speed of 100 mm/s. The glass plates were subsequently immersed in a deionized water bath to achieve polymer sedimentation. The membranes were withdrawn from the water bath and kept in fresh deionized water for at least 1 day after manufacture to ensure complete phase inversion. The casting solution's composition is shown in Table 1. Before the experiments, all membranes were operated at 5 bar with deionized water.

Table 1

The manufactured membranes' casting solution composition (composition in wt%)

Membrane samplePESDMSOPU/PW
Pristine PES 14 86.0 0.00 
PES/PU/PW 0.5 wt% 14 85.5 0.50 
PES/PU/PW 1.0 wt% 14 85.0 1.00 
PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt% 14 84.0 2.00 
Membrane samplePESDMSOPU/PW
Pristine PES 14 86.0 0.00 
PES/PU/PW 0.5 wt% 14 85.5 0.50 
PES/PU/PW 1.0 wt% 14 85.0 1.00 
PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt% 14 84.0 2.00 

Characterization of pristine and composite membranes

The surface morphology of the manufactured pristine PES membrane and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Gemini Zeiss Supra 55). The membranes were coated with a gold layer after drying at room temperature. The SEM images were taken using a 20.0 kV acceleration voltage. The contact angle of all the manufactured membranes is measured to determine their surface hydrophilicity. A dead-end flat sheet membrane module with a filtration area of 14.6 cm2 was used to test the filtration performance of the manufactured membranes at a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C and an operating pressure of 1 bar.

The permeation flux (J) was calculated by using the following equation after collecting the filtered water in the prescribed intervals (Ganjali et al. 2021).
(1)
where J is the permeate flux (L/m2h); V is the volume of permeate pure water (L), A is the effective area of the membrane (m2), and Δt is the filtration time (h).
The overall porosity (ε) was calculated by the gravimetric method. Further details on the porosity calculation can be found elsewhere (Ocakoglu et al. 2021). The overall porosity (ε) of the prepared membranes was determined using Equation (2) based on the gravimetric method.
(2)
where Ww is the weight of the wet membrane (g); Wd is the weight of the dry membrane (g); ρw is the density of pure water at room temperature (0.998 g/cm3); A is the effective area of the membrane (cm2), and is the membrane thickness (cm).
Furthermore, the mean pore radius (rp) on the basis of the pure water flux and porosity data was calculated by the Guerout–Elford–Ferry equation.
(3)
where rp is the mean pore radius (nm); η is water viscosity (8.9 × 10−4 Pa s); is the membrane thickness (m); Q is the volume of the permeate water per unit time (m3/s); and ΔP is the operating pressure (0.1 MPa).

Protein and HA rejection experiments of the membranes

The dead-end filtration system was filled separately with 100 mg/L of BSA solution and 50 mg/L of HA solution to test the efficiency of the manufactured membranes. To prevent the denaturation of protein, BSA solution was prepared in phosphate buffer solution (PBS, 50 mM, pH 7.4 ± 0.1). Both solutions were filtrated at 1 bar for 120 min. The Lowry method (Lowry et al. 1951) was used to determine the protein concentration of the feed (Cf) and permeate (Cp). The HA concentration in the solution is represented by total organic carbon (TOC) content, which was measured by using a TOC analyzer (Elementar, Vario TOC Cube). The desorption experiments for BSA and HA, which were adsorbed onto the membrane surface, were conducted by separately filtering them for 150 min at prepared concentrations. Afterward, the membranes were placed in pure water and agitated using an orbital shaker to measure the time-dependent amounts of BSA and HA pollutants on their surfaces that passed into the pure water.

Characterization of PU/PW nanocapsules

An SEM image of the synthesized material is shown in Figure 1. An SEM image indicated that PU/PW nanocapsules with spherical, nanoscale core–PU shell structures were synthesized. The particle diameters of the synthesized PU/PW nanocapsule are 110–220 nm.
Figure 1

The representative SEM images in different magnifications of the prepared PU/PW nanocapsule.

Figure 1

The representative SEM images in different magnifications of the prepared PU/PW nanocapsule.

Close modal
FTIR analysis of the synthesized material is shown in Figure 2. According to the results of the FTIR analysis, the peaks of 3,337 and 1,554 cm−1 show N–H stretching vibration and N–H bending vibrations, and these vibrations show urethane bond formation. The peaks of 2,906, 1,402, and 1,221 cm−1 are the CH stretching vibrations of the CH3 group and the CH2 group for long chain bonds, respectively, and these peaks belong to the PW core spectra. In addition, PU/PW nanocapsule spectra show the complete reaction of IPDI during the 2,255 cm−1 peak PU/PW nanocapsule synthesis (Abdeali et al. 2021).
Figure 2

FTIR analysis of the synthesized PU/PW nanocapsule. Please refer to the online version of this paper to see this figure in colour: https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2023.268.

Figure 2

FTIR analysis of the synthesized PU/PW nanocapsule. Please refer to the online version of this paper to see this figure in colour: https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2023.268.

Close modal
TGA and DSC analyses can provide valuable information about the thermal stability and phase behavior of the composite materials. TGA analysis of the synthesized material is shown in Figure 3. According to the TGA analysis results shown in Figure 3(a), a decrease in the PU/PW weight occurs with an increase in temperature. A one-step decomposition occurs in the PU/PW nanocapsule structure depending on the temperature.
Figure 3

(a) TGA and (b) DSC analysis of the synthesized PU/PW nanocapsule.

Figure 3

(a) TGA and (b) DSC analysis of the synthesized PU/PW nanocapsule.

Close modal

According to the results of the TGA analysis, approximately 92% mass loss occurred, and from the DTG curve (red curve) given in the TGA analysis, it is seen that the maximum temperature value at which degradation occurs is 367.8 °C. This temperature value obtained from the DTG curve shows the highest material loss at 367.8 °C. DSC analysis of the synthesized material is shown in Figure 3(b). The endothermic peak at 49.9 °C is seen in the DSC analysis graph, and this peak belongs to the PU/PW nanocapsules. The use of PU/PW nanocapsules provided delayed temperature increases.

Characterization of PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes

The surface SEM micrographs of the manufactured pristine and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes are shown in Figure 4. On the pristine membrane, there was a smooth surface. The PU/PW nanocapsules, which are spherical, have coated the surface of the PES membranes in a very smooth pattern, as shown by SEM micrographs. As the concentration increases from 0.5 to 2.0%, the amount of PU/PW capsules on the surface increases.
Figure 4

SEM images of PES membranes blended with different ratios of PU/PW nanocapsules (pristine and PU/PW compositions in wt%).

Figure 4

SEM images of PES membranes blended with different ratios of PU/PW nanocapsules (pristine and PU/PW compositions in wt%).

Close modal
The surface SEM micrographs of PES PU/PW 2.0 wt% membranes after 2 h of filtration of BSA and HA are shown in Figure 5. It is clearly visible that the cake layer formed during the filtration process covers the membrane surface for both pollutants. The molecular weight of HA is relatively higher compared to BSA, which has a molecular weight of 66.5 kDa, and as observed, the fouling occurring on the membrane surface is, therefore, more pronounced.
Figure 5

SEM images of PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt% membranes after (a) BSA and (b) HA filtration.

Figure 5

SEM images of PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt% membranes after (a) BSA and (b) HA filtration.

Close modal

The energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS) mapping of pristine and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membrane depicted that the elementary components were composed of C, O, and S (Table 2). It can be seen the increase in the C ratio and the decrease in the O and S ratio indicate that the PU/PW is successfully involved in the membrane structure.

Table 2

EDS of the pristine and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes

Percentages of the elements (wt%)Pristine membranePES/PU/PW 0.5 wt%PES/PU/PW 1.0 wt%PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt%
54.93 60.0 62.49 62.61 
20.36 16.99 15.5 17.58 
24.71 23.01 22.02 19.81 
Percentages of the elements (wt%)Pristine membranePES/PU/PW 0.5 wt%PES/PU/PW 1.0 wt%PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt%
54.93 60.0 62.49 62.61 
20.36 16.99 15.5 17.58 
24.71 23.01 22.02 19.81 

The porosity and mean pore size of the membranes are presented in Table 3. The results showed that the porosity of the membranes decreased from 62.5 ± 1.1 to 55.5 ± 1.2% after blended of PU/PW nanocapsules. Moreover, the mean pore radius decreased from 24.8 ± 0.35 to 17.7 ± 0.19 nm.

Table 3

Porosity and mean pore size of the membranes

Membrane typePorosity (%)Mean pore radius (nm)
Pristine PES 62.5 ± 1.1 24.8 ± 0.35 
PES/PU/PW 0.5 wt% 60.8 ± 1.3 22.1 ± 0.29 
PES/PU/PW 1.0 wt% 57.6 ± 1.5 19.8 ± 0.32 
PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt% 55.5 ± 1.2 17.7 ± 0.19 
Membrane typePorosity (%)Mean pore radius (nm)
Pristine PES 62.5 ± 1.1 24.8 ± 0.35 
PES/PU/PW 0.5 wt% 60.8 ± 1.3 22.1 ± 0.29 
PES/PU/PW 1.0 wt% 57.6 ± 1.5 19.8 ± 0.32 
PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt% 55.5 ± 1.2 17.7 ± 0.19 

For pristine PES and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes, the variation of deionized water permeability coefficient (Jp) against transmembrane pressure (TMP) was investigated (Figure 6(a)). According to the Darcy law, there is a straight linear relationship between pressure operation and permeate flux. The pure water permeate of PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes showed better performance against pristine PES membranes, but a decrease was observed with an increasing PU/PW ratio. It is known that the contact angle is related to the membrane hydrophilicity and when compared to hydrophobic membranes, hydrophilic membranes have a lower flux reduction (Figure 6(b)) (Celik et al. 2011). The contact angle of the pristine PES membrane has measured 73.40 ± 1.32. With the increase of nanocapsule ratio, the contact angle decreased from 67.23 ± 1.82 to 64.55 ± 1.23 for PU/PW blended membranes. Despite the increase in hydrophilicity, the modified membranes showed a decrease in the permeance of pure water. This could be attributed to the blockage of membrane pores caused by the nanocapsules, which is supported by the fact that the pore size distribution of all modified membranes was narrower than that of the pristine ones (Zhao et al. 2013; Kasemset et al. 2017).
Figure 6

(a) Variation of permeability coefficient (Jp) of deionized water against TMP and (b) contact angle.

Figure 6

(a) Variation of permeability coefficient (Jp) of deionized water against TMP and (b) contact angle.

Close modal

BSA and HA flux performance of PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes

The ability of the membrane to filter solutions, also known as flux or permeability, is a key metric for its performance. Another essential feature is the membrane's ability to remove components or particles from the solution, which is referred to as solute rejection (Field & Wu 2022). BSA and HA fluxes are given in Figure 7(a) and 7(b). The pristine PES membrane has shown the lowest steady-state fluxes at 45.84 and 46.59 L/m2h for BSA and HA. With the increase of PU/PW nanocapsule ratio from 0.5 to 1.0 wt%, steady-state fluxes increased from 51.96 to 71.61 and from 67.87 to 98.73 L/m2h, respectively, for BSA and HA. However, for the PES/PU/PW 2.0 wt% membrane, it was observed that the steady-state flux did not increase but slightly decreased, compared to PES/PU/PW 1.0%. The agglomeration of PU/PW nanocapsules in the structure of composite membranes and the balking of the pores, resulting in smaller pore-sized membranes, could explain this decrease. The manufactured membranes' capacity to reject BSA and HA was also investigated (Figure 7(c)). Due to the PU/PW nanocapsules present in the membrane matrix rendering the membrane surface hydrophilic, composite membranes are expected to attract water molecules more effectively during filtration, resulting in higher permeability (Wang et al. 2022). On the other hand, it was observed that the zeta potential of the PU/PW nanocapsules in pure water was negatively charged (−81.46 mV) at neutral pH. When the surface of PES membranes is uncharged, it is expected that the inclusion of PU/PW nanocapsules into the membrane matrix would result in a negative surface charge. It is known from previous studies in the literature that BSA and HA also have a negative charge under neutral pH conditions (Xu et al. 2003; Klučáková 2018). The BSA and HA rejection efficiencies of PU/PW nanocapsule blended PES membranes also increased significantly compared to pristine PES membranes, with BSA rejection increasing from 93.95 to 100% and HA rejection increasing from 98.78 to 100%. It can be inferred that having a negative surface charge on the membrane, while pollutants like BSA and HA are negatively charged as well, improves both the removal efficiency of these pollutants and the flux performance. Therefore, it can be concluded that the increased hydrophilicity contributed to the improved BSA and HA rejection. The results obtained after the desorption of BSA and HA pollutants adsorbed on the membrane surface are presented in Figure 7(d). The total desorption amounts for BSA and HA were 22.27 and 8.42 μg/cm2, respectively.
Figure 7

(a) BSA, (b) humic acid flux and (c) removal efficiencies of pristine and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes.

Figure 7

(a) BSA, (b) humic acid flux and (c) removal efficiencies of pristine and PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes.

Close modal

In this study, nano-encapsulated paraffin wax core/thermoplastic elastomer polyurethane shell (PW/PU) was synthesized by the mini-emulsion polymerization method and then it is used for manufacturing PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes by the phase inversion method. PU/PW nanocapsules were characterized by SEM, TGA, DSC, and FTIR analyses. The use of PU/PW nanocapsules provided delayed temperature increases, which are confirmed by DSC. All membranes were characterized by SEM, SEM-EDS, and contact angle. After the PU/PW nanocapsules were dispersed into the PES membrane, the composite membranes' hydrophilicity increased. BSA and HA are used to test the antifouling and permeability performance of manufactured membranes. The pure water, BSA, and HA fluxes of the composite membranes increased compared to the pristine PES membrane. PU/PW nanocapsules blended PES membranes can be used to decrease membrane fouling.

B.S., G.K., Y.O. and A.A. performed methodology and data curation. K.O. and N.D. conceptualized, investigated, and wrote the original draft and did formal analysis and reviewed and edited the manuscript.

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

AitAli
S.
,
Ziani
S.
,
Yahiaoui
I.
,
Brahmi
A.
,
Boudrahem
F.
&
Aissani-Benissad
F.
2023
Application of central composite design and response surface methodology for the study of extraction of gentian violet dye in aqueous solution by polystyrene membrane modified with oleic acid
.
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
e14200
,
1
12
.
Arenas-Sánchez
A.
,
Rico
A.
&
Vighi
M.
2016
Effects of water scarcity and chemical pollution in aquatic ecosystems: state of the art
.
Science of the Total Environment
572
,
390
403
.
Barambu
N. U.
,
Bilad
M. R.
,
Laziz
A. M.
,
Nordin
N. A. H. M.
,
Bustam
M. A.
,
Shamsuddin
N.
&
Khan
A. L.
2021
A wavy flow channel system for membrane fouling control in oil/water emulsion filtration
.
Journal of Water Process Engineering
44
,
102340
.
Cao
Y.
,
Farouk
N.
,
Ayed
H.
,
Aly
A. A.
,
Jarad
F.
,
Dahari
M.
,
Wae-hayee
M.
&
Saleh
B.
2022
Heat transfer improvement between a pair of heater and cooler inside an energy storage by using nano-encapsulated phase change material/water: a numerical modeling
.
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
30
,
101770
.
Dibene
K.
,
Yahiaoui
I.
,
Yahia Cherif
L.
,
Aitali
S.
,
Amrane
A.
&
Aissani-Benissad
F.
2020
Paracetamol degradation by photo-activated peroxydisulfate process (UV/PDS): kinetic study and optimization using central composite design
.
Water Science and Technology
82
(
7
),
1404
1415
.
Faraj
K.
,
Khaled
M.
,
Faraj
J.
,
Hachem
F.
&
Castelain
C.
2021
A review on phase change materials for thermal energy storage in buildings: heating and hybrid applications
.
Journal of Energy Storage
33
,
101913
.
Ganjali
M. R.
,
Al-Naqshabandi
M. A.
,
Larijani
B.
,
Badiei
A.
,
Vatanpour
V.
,
Rajabi
H. R.
,
Rezania
H.
,
Paziresh
S.
,
Mahmodi
G.
,
Kim
S. J.
&
Saeb
M. R.
2021
Improvement of dye and protein filtration efficiency using modified PES membrane with 2-mercaptoethanol capped zinc sulfide quantum dots
.
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
168
,
109
121
.
Gupta
B.
,
Bhalavi
J.
,
Sharma
S.
&
Bisen
A.
2020
Phase change materials in solar energy applications: a review
.
Materials Today: Proceedings
46
,
5550
5554
.
Jin
Z.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Liu
J.
&
Yang
Z.
2008
Synthesis and properties of paraffin capsules as phase change materials
.
Polymer
49
(
12
),
2903
2910
.
Kasemset
S.
,
Wang
L.
,
He
Z.
,
Miller
D. J.
,
Kirschner
A.
,
Freeman
B. D.
&
Sharma
M. M.
2017
Influence of polydopamine deposition conditions on hydraulic permeability, sieving coefficients, pore size and pore size distribution for a polysulfone ultrafiltration membrane
.
Journal of Membrane Science
522
,
100
115
.
Li
J.
,
Hu
Y.
,
Hou
Y.
,
Shen
X.
,
Xu
G.
,
Dai
L.
,
Zhou
J.
,
Liu
Y.
&
Cai
K.
2015
Phase-change material filled hollow magnetic nanoparticles for cancer therapy and dual modal bioimaging
.
Nanoscale
7
(
19
),
9004
9012
.
Li
Q.
,
Sun
L.
,
Hou
M.
,
Chen
Q.
,
Yang
R.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Xu
Z.
,
Kang
Y.
&
Xue
P.
2019
Phase-change material packaged within hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles carrying doxorubicin and chlorine 6 for fluorescence-guided trimodal therapy of cancer
.
ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
11
(
1
),
417
429
.
Lowry
O. H.
,
Rosebrough
N. J.
,
Farr
A. L.
&
Randall
R. J.
1951
Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent
.
The Journal of Biological Chemistry
193
(
1
),
265
275
.
Lu
Y.
,
Xiao
X.
,
Fu
J.
,
Huan
C.
,
Qi
S.
,
Zhan
Y.
,
Zhu
Y.
&
Xu
G.
2019
Novel smart textile with phase change materials encapsulated core-sheath structure fabricated by coaxial electrospinning
.
Chemical Engineering Journal
355
,
532
539
.
Magendran
S. S.
,
Khan
F. S. A.
,
Mubarak
N. M.
,
Vaka
M.
,
Walvekar
R.
,
Khalid
M.
,
Abdullah
E. C.
,
Nizamuddin
S.
&
Karri
R. R.
2019
Synthesis of organic phase change materials (PCM) for energy storage applications: a review
.
Nano-Structures and Nano-Objects
20
,
100399
.
Nasir
A. M.
,
Adam
M. R.
,
Mohamad Kamal
S. N. E. A.
,
Jaafar
J.
,
Othman
M. H. D.
,
Ismail
A. F.
,
Aziz
F.
,
Yusof
N.
,
Bilad
M. R.
,
Mohamud
R.
,
Rahman
M. A.
&
Wan Salleh
W. N.
2022
A review of the potential of conventional and advanced membrane technology in the removal of pathogens from wastewater
.
Separation and Purification Technology
286
,
120454
.
Nikpourian
H.
,
Bahramian
A. R.
&
Abdollahi
M.
2020
On the thermal performance of a novel PCM nanocapsule: the effect of core/shell
.
Renewable Energy
151
,
322
331
.
Ocakoglu
K.
,
Dizge
N.
,
Colak
S. G.
,
Ozay
Y.
,
Bilici
Z.
,
Yalcin
M. S.
,
Ozdemir
S.
&
Yatmaz
H. C.
2021
Polyethersulfone membranes modified with CZTS nanoparticles for protein and dye separation: improvement of antifouling and self-cleaning performance
.
Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
616
,
126230
.
Peng
H.
,
Wang
J.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Ma
J.
,
Shen
T.
,
Li
S.
&
Dong
B.
2021
A review on synthesis, characterization and application of nanoencapsulated phase change materials for thermal energy storage systems
.
Applied Thermal Engineering
185
,
116326
.
Rodríguez-Cumplido
F.
,
Pabón-Gelves
E.
&
Chejne-Jana
F.
2019
Recent developments in the synthesis of microencapsulated and nanoencapsulated phase change materials
.
Journal of Energy Storage
24
,
100821
.
Roy
A.
,
Venna
S. R.
,
Rogers
G.
,
Tang
L.
,
Fitzgibbons
T. C.
,
Liu
J.
,
McCurry
H.
,
Vickery
D. J.
,
Flick
D.
&
Fish
B.
2021
Membranes for olefin–paraffin separation: an industrial perspective
.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
118
(
37
),
e2022194118
.
Shchukina
E. M.
,
Graham
M.
,
Zheng
Z.
&
Shchukin
D. G.
2018
Nanoencapsulation of phase change materials for advanced thermal energy storage systems
.
Chemical Society Reviews
47
(
11
),
4156
4175
.
Vadhera
J.
,
Sura
A.
,
Nandan
G.
&
Dwivedi
G.
2018
Study of phase change materials and its domestic application
.
Materials Today: Proceedings
5
(
2
),
3411
3417
.
Yang
L.
,
Jin
X.
,
Zhang
Y.
&
Du
K.
2021
Recent development on heat transfer and various applications of phase-change materials
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
287
,
124432
.
Zhao
C.
,
Xue
J.
,
Ran
F.
&
Sun
S.
2013
Modification of polyethersulfone membranes – a review of methods
.
Progress in Materials Science
58
(
1
),
76
150
.
Zhi
M.
,
Fan
R.
,
Yang
X.
,
Zheng
L.
,
Yue
S.
,
Liu
Q.
&
He
Y.
2022
Recent research progress on phase change materials for thermal management of lithium-ion batteries
.
Journal of Energy Storage
45
,
103694
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).