The present study investigates the potential of locust bean gum (LBG), in accelerating the startup of a novel upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor handling municipal sewage. Under identical conditions, two lab-scale UASB reactors were operated in parallel, to substantiate this idea. The novel reactor (RH) with an inner centric hybrid UASB module and an outer concentric downflow hanging sponge (DHS) unit started off with an LBG polymer as an additive. Its performance was compared with a conventional system (RC). RH outclassed with an accelerated startup in 40 days, with the highest COD removal of 89% by the UASB compartment and 95% by the entire system (UASB + DHS). RC took nearly 85 days to achieve the highest COD removal of 83%. The polymer also succeeded with a dense sludge bed fastening most of the anaerobes, read by the least sludge volume index (SVI) of 26 mL/g. Specific methanogenic activity (SMA) (RH – 0.715 ± 0.05 and RC – 0.670 ± 0.07 g CH4-COD/g VSS/ day) and extracellular polymer (ECP) concentration (0.30–0.32 g/g VSS) of biomass in both reactors were almost similar. This further confirmed that early granulation was induced solely by the polymer and it also had no deleterious impact on substrate transfer.

  • Enhancement of anaerobic granulation by natural gum-based polymer – locust bean gum.

  • Polysaccharidic structure, self-gelling property, and good coagulating potential of the biopolymer, favored aggregation of microflora in the sludge bed.

  • The novel UASB reactor was designed to bear the resemblance of clariflocculator – inner centric UASB module and an outer concentric downflow hanging sponge unit

India being a developing country, is in the phase of rapid industrialization and urbanization. This is well evident from the agglomeration in urban population from 28 crores in 2001 to 37 crores in 2011 (taken from Census 2011). Though both are good on one hand with respect to our economic developments, it has indeed put a threat to the goal of sustainable development (Aishwaryalakshmi & Palanivelu 2022). Urbanization has imposed intense pressure on our water resources in two major tracks. Rise in water demand to meet the domestic requirements, and discharge of this used water on the receiving environment. To satisfy the growing demand, water for domestic and industrial needs is tapped from rivers, streams, wells, lakes and various groundwater resources. Of which 80% of the supplied water for domestic needs returns back as wastewater, depleting the water bodies (Sangamnere et al. 2023).

According to the reports of the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) (2021), there are nearly 1,631 sewage treatment plants (STPs) operating in different parts of our country with a total capacity of 36,668 million litres per day (MLD). Surprisingly the quantity of sewage generated by urban localities was estimated to be 72,368 MLD (nearly double the capacity of treatment plants). Though there are many treatment schemes which are strategically planned and are in place, yet there is always a large gap between the quantity of sewage generated and the capacity of treatment plants. Hence alarming issue faced by every developing/underdeveloped country would be the discharge of untreated or partially treated municipal sewage into water bodies (Henze & Ledin 2004). Having finite resources in hand, the only sound option to meet our demands would be the conservation of the existing aquatic ecosystem. Municipal sewage in other ways, can be considered as a resource to meet our non-potable requirements. By which the groundwater and surface water resources can be conserved (Mazhar et al. 2021).

With the rising concern for net-zero carbon emission, anaerobic treatment systems can be considered as the wise choice (Wang et al. 2005). For every kg of chemical oxygen demand (COD) anaerobically digested, nearly 0.35 m3 of biogas and 0.1 kg of biomass are obtained. On average, about 1 kWh (fossil energy) can be recovered from kg−1 of COD destroyed (which in terms of CH4 is 13.5 MJ). This energy-rich biogas (with 50–75% methane) can be used as an alternative to fossil fuels, thereby reducing global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Among the anaerobic systems, the granule-based UASB reactors have gained an extensive reach, because of their high treatment potential (Lettinga et al. 2001). Since biomass retention and liquid retention are uncoupled in a UASB reactor, they can maintain a high loading rate with longer solids retention time (SRT) even at short hydraulic retention times (HRTs) (Arivalagan & Stanislaus 2022). Hence, the reactor's volume can be considerably reduced, which further would cut down the capital cost, making it a cost-effective technology.

Generally, UASB reactors are coined as energy-economic systems, as they are apparent in forming their own sludge bed (Guo et al. 2022). Granules which come up with the classic aggregation of biomass are at the heart of this treatment scheme. These granules are featured with enhanced settleability, which thereby holds the microbes within the system for a longer span (Sethi et al. 2023). Besides, they are capable of providing an in-depth contact between the substrate and microbiota, which would further enhance the treatment (Tiwari et al. 2005).

However, the major shortfall of this technology is its lengthened startup phase (time taken for the formation of granular sludge bed). On average it takes nearly 3–8 months for any UASB reactor to achieve a successful startup, relatable to the slow growth of methanogens (Owusu-Agyeman et al. 2021). To accelerate the startup phase and to extend the application of these reactors, researchers have proposed a number of additives. However, most of the findings were limited to high-strength wastewater. Hence, this study focused on the idea of using locust bean gum (LBG), a natural gum-based polymer, as an additive to accelerate the startup of the UASB reactor treating municipal sewage. This water-based viscosifier (LBG) holds a good coagulating potential and exotic self-gelling property, which remained as the reason behind its selection. Also being a non-ionic polymer, its solutions were seldom influenced by pH, salts and heat treatment. Going for biopolymers would in turn benefit us with the ease of degradation – posing no harm to the ecosystem (Liang et al. 2019).

Hence, a study was taken up to evaluate the startup of a novel UASB reactor (designed to bear the resemblance of a clariflocculator, with a centric UASB unit and outer concentric downflow hanging sponge (DHS) module) in comparison with the conventional system. Effluent and sludge characteristics of both reactors were analyzed in detail to pin down the influence of additives used, in enhancing the startup of the UASB reactor treating municipal sewage.

Inoculum

Seed sludge for the study was collected from the anaerobic digester of an STP at Perungudi, Chennai, India. The inoculum was screened through a 0.15-mm sieve to remove the floating debris and large-sized inert fractions and then seeded to the reactors. Detailed characterization of the seed sludge is presented in Table 1.

Table 1

Characteristics of the seed sludge

ParametersValue
Mixed liquor suspended solids 12,050–12,110 (mg/L) 
Mixed liquor volatile suspended solids 6,155–6,200 (mg/L) 
Sludge volume index 50–52 (mL/g) 
VSS/TSS 0.50–0.51 
Specific methanogenic activity 0.150–0.175 (g CH₄-COD/g VSS/day) 
ParametersValue
Mixed liquor suspended solids 12,050–12,110 (mg/L) 
Mixed liquor volatile suspended solids 6,155–6,200 (mg/L) 
Sludge volume index 50–52 (mL/g) 
VSS/TSS 0.50–0.51 
Specific methanogenic activity 0.150–0.175 (g CH₄-COD/g VSS/day) 

VSS, volatile suspended solids; TSS, total suspended solids.

Substrate

Feed for the reactors was collected fresh at the start of each day, from the STP at Anna University, Chennai, India. To begin with, the wastewater collected after screening was characterized for its qualitative and quantitative parameters, following APHA (2012) standards, and these are tabulated in Table 2 (Water Environment Federation 2012). The substrate exhibited higher organics (COD 720–880 mg/L) and nutrient concentrations (TP 22–35 mg/L) than the city's municipal sewage, as the STP receives wastewater from the university's toilets, hostels, mess kitchen, cafeterias, laboratories, laundry units and staff quarters.

Table 2

Characteristics of raw sewage fed to the reactors

ParametersValue
pH 6.8–7.2 
Biochemical oxygen demand 300–375 (mg/L) 
Chemical oxygen demand 720–880 (mg/L) 
Total suspended solids 335–400 (mg/L) 
Volatile suspended solids 300–362 (mg/L) 
Alkalinity 305–340 (mg/L as CaCO₃) 
Volatile fatty acid 10–20 (mg/L) 
Total kjeldahl nitrogen 35–48 (mg/L) 
Total phosphate as P 22–35 (mg/L) 
Sulfate as SO₄ 58–70 (mg/L) 
ParametersValue
pH 6.8–7.2 
Biochemical oxygen demand 300–375 (mg/L) 
Chemical oxygen demand 720–880 (mg/L) 
Total suspended solids 335–400 (mg/L) 
Volatile suspended solids 300–362 (mg/L) 
Alkalinity 305–340 (mg/L as CaCO₃) 
Volatile fatty acid 10–20 (mg/L) 
Total kjeldahl nitrogen 35–48 (mg/L) 
Total phosphate as P 22–35 (mg/L) 
Sulfate as SO₄ 58–70 (mg/L) 

Additive

LBG is a creamy white powder, produced by grinding the seed endosperm of the carob tree (Ceratonia siliqua). In general, it is predominated by the complex carbohydrate polymers of galactose and mannose in different proportions (say 1:3.1–1:3.9). Also, the average molecular weight of locust galactomannan varies typically in the range of 0.3–2.0 million. This galactomannan is known to exhibit an extended ribbon-like pattern in its solid state and a semi-flexibile coil framework in its liquid state (Barak & Mudgil 2014). Besides its polysaccharidic structure, the viscosity induced by the polymer facilitates the aggregation of microbiota through hydrogen bonding (Cheng et al. 2020).

Reactor configuration

A photographic view and a schematic sketch of the novel UASB reactor (RH) of 6 L capacity, designed and erected for this experimental study, is illustrated in Figure 1(a) and 1(b). The plexiglass-made reactor of 8 mm thickness consisted of two concentric, cylindrical functional units. The inner cylindrical unit with a varying diameter of (0.10–0.25 m) across the height of 1 m served as the hybrid UASB module. Whereas the outer concentric tubular unit of 0.30 m (Ø) worked as the polishing facility. The hybrid UASB module was designed to accommodate three distinct zones along its height as in Figure 1(b).
Figure 1

(a) Photographic view of the designed hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor RH (along with distinguished zones), (b) schematic setup of hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor RH, (c) photographic representation of conventional upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (RC), and (d) schematic representation of conventional upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (RC).

Figure 1

(a) Photographic view of the designed hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor RH (along with distinguished zones), (b) schematic setup of hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor RH, (c) photographic representation of conventional upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (RC), and (d) schematic representation of conventional upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (RC).

Close modal

(1) Sludge bed zone (0.10 m Ø) – rising to a depth of 0.45 m from the inlet port. (2) Filter media zone (0.10 m Ø) – comprised of Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) gel media (procured from Kuraray Co., Ltd – Tokyo, Japan), floating against a screen at 0.70 m height. (3) Enhanced gas liquid solid separator (GLSS) of 0.25 m height – the lower half of GLSS was designed as an inclined entity with a slope angle of 60°, whereas the upper half resembled a tubular unit of 0.25 m Ø. To capture the biogas generated, the top lid of the GLSS facility was anchored with a canopy of 0.23 m Ø. The captured biogas was quantified by the water displacement method, using a Mariotte bottle (Mamun & Torii 2015). Effluent from the GLSS was uniformly distributed to the outer aerobic compartment by a perforated plate. DHS module comprising of 6th generation sponge cylinders (supplied by courtesy of AKSHAT enterprises – India) was incorporated as the polishing component, to remove the nutrients and remaining carbonaceous fractions. Finally, the treated water was collected from the effluent ports positioned at the bottom.

The photographic setup and line sketch of the conventional UASB reactor (RC) fabricated for this study is represented in Figure 1(c) and 1(d). The plexiglass-made reactor of 8 mm thickness provided a working volume of 6 L (similar to that of RH). A cylindrical column of 0.15 m (Ø) extending to a depth of 0.45 m stood as the functional unit of RC. Feed was supplied to the reactor from the inlet port at the bottom and the required flow rate was maintained with the peristaltic pump, procured from Susethil Engineering, Chennai.

The sludge bed zone occupied a depth of 0.15 m from the inlet port, above which was the clarifier zone (observed at the middle third of the reactor). A conventional GLSS of (0.15 m height) was stationed at the top end of the reactor. It comprised of an inverted cone (0.12 m Ø) affixed with the lid of the reactor – biogas generated from the system was collected through this provision. At this juncture, treated water gets collected from the effluent port with a water seal facility.

Influent and the effluent samples along with those drawn from various ports across the reactors were analyzed for pH, alkalinity, COD, volatile suspended solids (VSS), and volatile fatty acid (VFA), on every alternate day. Sludge samples drawn from the bottom of both the reactors were analyzed for mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS), mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) and sludge volume index (SVI) on every other day. All the analysis were carried out in accordance with the ‘Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater’ (APHA Standards 2012).

A digital pH meter procured from Vani International, India was used for the determination of pH. The COD of the samples were analyzed following the closed reflux colorimetric method. VFA was quantified by titration method following (Dilallo & Albertson 1961). The first 25 mL of the sample was taken and its initial pH was noted, it was then titrated with 0.1 N of H2SO4 until a pH of 4.3 was observed. The sample's pH was further lowered to a range of 3.3–3.5 and boiled to remove excess CO2. It was then cooled to room temperature and back-titrated to a pH of 7 using 0.05 N of NaOH. Based on the volume consumed during both titrations, VFA concentration was estimated.

Since extracellular polymer (ECP) content comprising (polysaccharides and protein) plays a dominant role in the granulation process, it was also quantified. Extraction of ECP from the sludge samples was done by cooling extraction method (Kuba et al. 1992). Two milliliters of sludge sample was centrifuged to remove the supernatant and added with 10 mL of 0.85% NaCl and 60 μL of formalin. This mixed liquor was ultra-sonicated for 300 s while being in an ice pack, for the extraction of ECP content. Later the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 min and the supernatant was alone separated and analyzed for polysaccharide and protein. The sulfuric acid-anthrone method was adopted for the estimation of polysaccharide and the Lowry Folin method helped with protein quantification (Lowry et al. 1951).

Serum bottle technique was taken up for the estimation of maximum specific methanogenic activity (SMA), using sodium acetate as the sole substrate at 35± 1 °C under anaerobic conditions (Valcke & Verstraete 1983). With the passage of time, the concentration of substrate from the serum bottle was assessed. The maximum slope of the concentration curve plotted denoted the activity of methanogenic bacteria.

Periodic visual examination of the granules was done and their surface morphology was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The sludge samples were prepared for analysis by fixing in a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution, dehydrating them in graded water–ethanol solutions (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 96 and 100%), followed by critical point drying and finally sputter coating with gold. SEM images were then taken with the support of the JEOL JSM-500LV microscope (Arivalagan & Stanislaus 2022).

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) technique was adopted to detect the functional groups present in the granules and to get more insights on the mechanism of their formation. The sample for analysis was prepared by subsequent freezing and drying. Potassium bromide (KBr) pellets for analysis were prepared by mixing 1 mg of powdered sample with 100 mg of spectrometry grade KBr under vacuum. FTIR spectra were then taken on the prepared KBr pellets using a Bruker VERTEX-70 IR infrared spectrometer.

Startup of novel UASB (RH) and control reactor (RC)

The LBG polymer used for this study was procured from ‘Chem pro solutions’ at an average cost of Rs. 500/kg. RH reactor was started by blending this polymer additive at a concentration of 20 mg/g TSS – from the comparative study of (Lakshmi & Raj 2022), with the seed sludge and the prepared inoculum was allowed to occupy one-third of the reactor's volume. Whereas RC started off with the collected seed sludge alone (with no additives), to compare the effectiveness of LBG polymer in accelerating the startup phase. The seed sludge was left undisturbed in both reactors for 3 days – to help microbes acclimatize to the newer environment. As suggested by (Barber & Stuckey 1999), both reactors were then fed with domestic sewage at a very low loading rate of 0.87 kg COD/m³/d, maintaining an HRT of 24 h. The performance of the reactors during startup was evaluated, by monitoring both the effluent and sludge characteristics.

Effluent characteristics of RH and RC

Figure 2 illustrates the performance of reactors RH and RC in terms of COD removal efficiency, during the startup. Three distinct phases can be visualized from the graphical plot of both reactors. In the case of RH the startup of both UASB and DHS modules is depicted. For RH, the acclimatization phase prevailed from (5–15 days), on the 5th day the COD removal which was around 45% gradually increased to 53% on the 15th day, indicating active biomass in the reactor had started to acclimatize by consuming the organics present in the feed – also experienced by (Shivayogimath & Ramanujam 1999). A steeper growth phase was observed from (15–40 days), which hinted at the adaptation of biomass to the prevailing conditions and their multiplication rate. On the 40th day the removal of organics was at its highest, around 89% for the UASB compartment and 95% for the novel RH reactor (UASB + DHS). From then on for the next 15 days, steady state conditions prevailed. Thus the novel RH reactor took almost 40 days for a successful startup. Similarly (Zhou et al. 2007) witnessed prominent granules in 39 days, with slight overloading and (Yu et al. 2001) by the use of Aluminium chloride achieved granulation in 60 days. Recently (Zhang et al. 2022) attained stable COD removals of 85% in 15 days with pumice as biological carriers.
Figure 2

COD removal efficiency for the startup phase of RH and RC.

Figure 2

COD removal efficiency for the startup phase of RH and RC.

Close modal

Though the acclimatization period of both reactors was almost similar, RC witnessed a longer span of growth phase (18–85 days) with a gradual rise in removal efficiencies. Hence the reactor reported the highest removal of 83% on the 85th day, which was steadily maintained for the next 10 days confirming a successful startup. This difference in the startup of both reactors confirms the influence of the LBG polymer in accelerating granulation. The polymer by its long chain length has aided in microbial bridging and its viscous nature in turn promoted the contact between microbes (Barak & Mudgil 2014). This proximity further enhanced mass transfer between syntrophic groups in the granules, which has indeed resulted in the improved removal of organic matter (Liang et al. 2019). Hence the polymer was also effective in reducing the startup time by nearly half than the control system. (Kalogo et al. 2001) took 22 weeks for the startup of a self-inoculated UASB reactor, with the support of the water extract of Moringa oleifera seeds (WEMOS) additive. Similarly, chitosan as an additive (Tiwari et al. 2005) witnessed startup in 65 days, with the largest granules of mean size 0.15 mm.

VSS concentration of the effluent was quantified to get better insights into sludge settleability and the development of dense sludge beds (Yu et al. 2001). Figure 3 presents a comparison of the effluent VSS concentration (for RH and RC). To begin with, the effluent VSS concentration was notably high for both reactors (178–190 mg/L), owing to poor sludge settleability. With the pace of time, VSS concentration of RH took a steep fall reaching 40 mg/L (UASB) and 17.5 mg/L (UASB + DHS) at the end of 40 days. In the event of RC the VSS concentration dropped at a slower rate with 116 mg/L on the 40th day and 63 mg/L on the 85th day. This confirms the efficiency of LBG polymer in holding the anaerobes and controlling sludge washout – which further correlates to the accelerated startup of the RH reactor, relatable to the observations of (Wang et al. 2005). Similarly, the granular bed baffled reactor (GRABBR) developed by Baloch et al. (2007) succeeded in controlling sludge washout – with effluent TSS concentrations of 30–135 mg/L.
Figure 3

Effluent volatile suspended solids concentration of RH and RC during the startup.

Figure 3

Effluent volatile suspended solids concentration of RH and RC during the startup.

Close modal
Figure 4(a) presents a graphical comparison of pH monitored during the startup of both reactors. The acclimatization phase was broadly observed with a slightly acidic pH (6.6–6.8), which gained a marginal rise (from 6.9 to 7.3) during the growth phase – similar to the observations of (Lomte & Shinde 2018). This can be connected to the stabilization of excess VFA by the microbes, which was also in line with the increased removal of organics (Baloch et al. 2007). Hence can be regarded as a manifestation of a successful startup with reference to pH.
Figure 4

(a) pH monitored for the startup phase of RH and RC, (b) volatile fatty acid and alkalinity changes for the startup phase of RH and RC.

Figure 4

(a) pH monitored for the startup phase of RH and RC, (b) volatile fatty acid and alkalinity changes for the startup phase of RH and RC.

Close modal

Figure 4(b) presents a comparison of effluent alkalinity and VFA during the startup of reactors RH and RC. During the acclimatization phase, both reactors were observed with a rise in VFA concentration from (20–40 mg/L) as the rate of consumption of VFA by microbes was less – relatable to the observations of (Wang et al. 2018). Thereby pile up of VFA concentration has resulted in reduced alkalinity (272–305 mg/L as CaCO3) and pH (6.6–6.8) during this stage as evident from Figure 4(b). With the onset of methanogenesis, VFA concentration dropped steadily reaching (8.5–10 mg/L) for RH and 17 mg/L for RC, toward the end of the growth phase. This period also visualized a consequent increase in alkalinity (320–390 mg/L as CaCO3) and pH (6.9–7.4) – similar to the results of (Kalogo et al. 2001; Zhang et. al. 2009). VFA/alkalinity ratio observed during the startup phase of RH and RC reactors was in the range of (0.03–0.13), which is less than 0.5 – an indication of proper anaerobic functioning, relatable to the observations of (Loganath & Mazumder 2018). (Ravichandran & Balaji 2020) in their study on a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (HUASB) reactor, observed VFA/Alkalinity ratios in the range of 0.13–0.381.

Sludge characteristics

Sludge characteristics of both reactors were monitored, to connect the role of polymer additive with the acceleration of startup. A record of the microbial population (VSS and TSS concentrations), their settleability (SVI), and activity (SMA) at periodic intervals was established.

Figure 5 portrays a graphical comparison of the solids concentration along with the variation in SVI, during the startup of RH and RC reactors. VSS concentration which was 6.1 g/L during the start of operation surged to 22.1 g/L on the 45th day for RH. Whereas on the 45th day, RC recorded a considerably lower VSS concentration of 12.95 g/L. This high microbial count of RH (in comparison to RC) corroborated the impact of LBG polymer in anchoring more biomass within the system. This water-based viscosifier has accelerated microbial adhesion through hydrogen bonding and has also controlled sludge washout. This is evident from the low SVI value of 26 mL/g for the RH reactor, in contrast to 39.8 mL/g of RC. RC took nearly 40 more days to achieve a high VSS concentration of 21.52 g/L (quite similar to RH) with a corresponding SVI of 30.5 mL/g. These findings stand strong in support of the biopolymer to enhance granulation. Similarly (Wang et al. 2018) by the addition of biochar achieved a higher microbial growth rate, with 43.31 g/L of VSS at the end of the operational phase.
Figure 5

Solids concentration along with the variation of sludge volume index for RH and RC.

Figure 5

Solids concentration along with the variation of sludge volume index for RH and RC.

Close modal
For an anaerobic system to achieve effective wastewater treatment, active methanogens play a crucial role. Hence quantification of SMA brings to light the ability of seed sludge to produce methane for a specific substrate and the stability of the system (Hussain & Dubey 2014). SMA activity quantified at the beginning and end of the startup phase for the two reactors, using sodium acetate as the sole substrate is presented in Figure 6(a). RH and RC reactors were observed with SMA values of (0.715 ± 0.05 and 0.670 ± 0.07 g CH₄-COD/g VSS/day) by the end of the startup phase, close to the findings of (Ariyavongvivat et al. 2015). The subtle variations in SMA activity confirmed that the enhanced startup (of RH) observed here was influenced solely by the LBG polymer. Furthermore, the polymeric layer formed around the cells by the additive used had no significant negative impact on substrate diffusion into and out of the biomass – indicated by the SMA results. This can be compared to the observations of Wang et al. (2005), where the polymer used inhibited substrate transfer, causing a negative effect on enhancement of SMA and multiplication of microbes. (Show et al. 2004) by the use of cationic polymer (AA 184 H – at an optimum dose of 80 mg/L) reduced the time taken for startup by nearly 43% (in comparison to control). Yet their SMA values had not much difference (2.04–2.16 g CH₄-COD/g VSS/ day), at an organic loading rate (OLR) of 12 g COD/L/d.
Figure 6

(a) Specific methanogenic activity quantified for the startup period of study reactors and (b) extracellular polymer characterization for the startup phase of RH and RC.

Figure 6

(a) Specific methanogenic activity quantified for the startup period of study reactors and (b) extracellular polymer characterization for the startup phase of RH and RC.

Close modal

This was further strengthened by ECP characterization of sludge samples, as shown in Figure 6(b). On completion of startup both reactors were characterized with ECP concentrations in the range of 0.30–0.32 g/g VSS. Corroborating that early startup was induced by the polymer additive, which was later strengthened by ECP secretions (Show et al. 2004). Similarly (Guo et al. 2022) in their study using bamboo charcoal witnessed ECP concentrations in the range of 0.1–0.26 g/g VSS and (Guo & Kang 2020) also observed similar protein and polysaccharides concentration of 0.03 and 0.12 g/g VSS. Whereas (Liang et al. 2020) quantified lower ECP concentrations in the range of (20–27 mg/g of VSS).

Sludge morphology

Visual observation of granules revealed a blackish-brown shade, of nearly spherical shape as captured in Figure 7(a). Figure 7(b)–7(e) portrays the SEM microstructure observations of sludge samples taken from RH and RC reactors at the end of the startup phase. The outer surface of granules took a dense spherical shape with minute sludge particles clinging to it (from Figure 7(b)) – which strongly pointed out that granulation has resulted from accumulation and adhesion of biomass. Similar observations were recorded by Zhou et al. (2006) in studying the enhancement of granulation in UASB reactors, with three different substrates, namely glucose, skim milk, and mixed volatile fatty acids (VFAs).
Figure 7

(a) Photographic view of segregated granules from RH at the end of startup phase. SEM observation of (b) outer surface of granules; (c) sectional view of the granules; (d and e) methanogenic microbial community dominated by Methanosarcina and Methanothrix.

Figure 7

(a) Photographic view of segregated granules from RH at the end of startup phase. SEM observation of (b) outer surface of granules; (c) sectional view of the granules; (d and e) methanogenic microbial community dominated by Methanosarcina and Methanothrix.

Close modal

A heterogeneous microbial community dominated by cocci (Methanosarcina), bacilli (Methanothrix), and filamentous bacterium was spotted in the samples of both reactors – as observed from Figure 7(d) and 7(e). The heterogeneity witnessed here was due to the complex nature of real wastewater (rather than synthetic) treated. According to De-Kreuk & van Loosdrecht (2006), heterogeneity is a distinct feature of granules which thrive on real wastewater. Also, Tay & Yan (1996) have made an interesting remark that the substrate used can influence the microbes contained in a granule. This was cited with an example – filamentous bacteria were found abundant in glucose-concentrated substrates.

Structural characterization – FTIR

To determine the presence of functional groups that were active during the treatment scheme and to validate their role in granulation, FTIR analysis was carried out for the best-performing reactor RH. The obtained spectra for the RH reactor by the end of the startup phase are shown in Figure 8. The predominant bands of the spotted spectra with their respective functional groups are tabulated in Table 3.
Table 3

FTIR spectra and their respective functional groups – RH reactor

Peaks observedWavelength (cm−1)Functional group identified
3,426 3,450–3,400 Hydroxyl functional groups 
2,975 2,970–2,890 Fatty Acids 
1,737, 1,550, 1,520 1,800–1,500 Amide I and II, Tyrosine side chains 
1,440, 1,410, 1,367, 1,220 1,470–1,250 Methyl groups, carboxylic groups, amide III 
1,015 1,150–500 Carbohydrates, nucleic acid 
Peaks observedWavelength (cm−1)Functional group identified
3,426 3,450–3,400 Hydroxyl functional groups 
2,975 2,970–2,890 Fatty Acids 
1,737, 1,550, 1,520 1,800–1,500 Amide I and II, Tyrosine side chains 
1,440, 1,410, 1,367, 1,220 1,470–1,250 Methyl groups, carboxylic groups, amide III 
1,015 1,150–500 Carbohydrates, nucleic acid 
Figure 8

Fourier transform infrared spectra spotted for the sludge sample of RH reactor.

Figure 8

Fourier transform infrared spectra spotted for the sludge sample of RH reactor.

Close modal

Since the major bands of carboxylic, amide, and carbohydrate functional groups fell in the region of 1,800–900 cm−1, it was dealt with in detail. Two peaks observed at 1,737 and 1,367 cm−1 were attributed to the C = O stretching vibration of three-turn helix and β-sheets in secondary protein structure, which has favored bio-flocculation. The presence of dissociated carboxyl groups could support the coagulation process by forming ion bridges, followed by the binding of divalent metal ions (Awang & Aziz 2012). In addition, the shoulder peak spotted at 1,520 cm−1 was due to the ring vibration in phenols of tyrosine side-chains, which confirmed tyrosine protein as a structural component of mature granular sludge (Dong et al. 2017).

The peaks spotted at 975 and 982 cm−1 indicated weak vibrations from phosphodiester bonds hinting at a lesser amount of extracellular nucleic acids. This can be taken as a positive sign in terms of microbial health. Hence, lower extracellular nucleic acid content confirmed higher biological activity of sludge, which was also apparent from the reactor's high treatment potential.

This work explored the potential of a natural gum-based polymer – LBG – in enhancing the startup of UASB reactors handling municipal sewage. A comparative study was taken forward to ascertain its competence and the following conclusions were drawn.

RH reactor started with an LBG polymer and achieved a successful startup in 40 days – with the highest COD removal of around 95%, in accordance with the effluent concentrations of (37–50 mg/L). Whereas RC took nearly 85 days to achieve the highest COD removal of 83%. The accelerated startup of RH sheds light on the potential of the LBG polymer in immobilizing biomass within the sludge bed and the eminence of the reactor's modified version – which has reflected on its improved removal. Relatively the biomass concentration of RH was observed at the highest of 20–22.1 g/L on the 45th day, corresponding to an SVI of 26 mL/g (the sign of a dense sludge bed). Besides RC took nearly 85 days to achieve the highest biomass concentration of 21.52 g/L, with respect to an SVI of 30.5 mL/g. SMA and morphological study of granules in RH further confirmed the presence of active methanogens, hence the shorter granulation period had no compromise with the microflora and their activity. Since the chosen biopolymer holds the ease of degradation, they do not cause any potential harm to mother earth. Hence, in a nutshell the polymer has proved its competence and can be considered as a sustainable choice for enhancing anaerobic granulation. The usage of this additive is yet to be investigated for several high-strength industrial wastewaters, which would fetch them a wider application.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Aishwaryalakshmi
A.
&
Palanivelu
K.
2022
Recovery of baking soda from reverse osmosis reject of desalination plant using carbon dioxide gas
.
Indian J. Chem. Technol.
29
,
174
180
.
https://doi.org/10.56042/ijct.v29i2.58091
.
Arivalagan
A. L.
&
Stanislaus
A. R.
2022
Performance evaluation of a novel upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor with built-in downflow hanging sponge module for the treatment of municipal sewage
.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
29
,
89108
89120
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21779-6
.
Ariyavongvivat
E.
,
Suraraksa
B.
&
Chaiprasert
P.
2015
Physicochemical and biological characteristics of enhanced anaerobic microbial granulation by synthetic and natural cationic polymers
.
Energy Procedia
79
.
Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.577
.
Baloch
M. I.
,
Akunna
J. C.
&
Collier
P. J.
2007
The performance of a phase separated granular bed bioreactor treating brewery wastewater
.
Bioresour. Technol.
98
,
1849
1855
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.014
.
Cheng
S. Y.
,
Show
P. L.
,
Juan
J. C.
,
Ling
T. C.
,
Lau
B. F.
,
Lai
S. H.
&
Ng
E. P.
2020
Sustainable landfill leachate treatment: optimize use of guar gum as natural coagulant and floc characterization
.
Environ. Res.
188
,
109737
.
De Kreuk
M. K.
&
van Loosdrecht
M. C.
2006
Formation of aerobic granules with domestic sewage
.
J. Environ. Eng.
132
(
6
),
694
697
.
Dilallo
R.
&
Albertson
O. E.
1961
Volatile acids by direct titration
.
J. Water Pollut. Control Fed.
33
,
356
365
.
Guo
J.
&
Kang
Y.
2020
Characterization of sulfate-reducing bacteria anaerobic sludge granulation enhanced by chitosan
.
J. Environ. Manage.
253
,
109648
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109648
.
Guo
M.
,
Jiang
Y.
,
Xie
J.
,
Cao
Q.
,
Zhang
Q.
,
Mabruk
A.
&
Chen
C.
2022
Bamboo charcoal addition enhanced the nitrogen removal of anammox granular sludge with COD: performance, physicochemical characteristics and microbial community
.
J. Environ. Sci. (China)
115
,
55
64
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2021.07.010
.
Henze
M.
&
Ledin
A.
2004
Types, characteristics and quantities of classic, combined domestic wastewaters
. In:
P. Lens, G. Zeeman, & G. Lettinga (Eds.)
Decentralized Sanitation and Reuse: Concepts, Systems and Implementation
.
IWA Publishing
,
Beijing
, pp.
59
72
.
Hussain
A.
&
Dubey
S. K.
2014
Specific methanogenic activity test for anaerobic treatment of phenolic wastewater
.
Desalin. Water Treat.
52
,
7015
7025
.
doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.823116
.
Kalogo
Y.
,
M'Bassiguié Séka
A.
&
Verstraete
W.
2001
Enhancing the start-up of a UASB reactor treating domestic wastewater by adding a water extract of Moringa oleifera seeds
.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
55
,
644
651
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000544
.
Kuba
T.
,
Furumai
H.
&
Kusuda
T.
1992
Discussion on the extraction methods of extracellular polymer
.
Proc. Environ. Eng. Res.
29
,
4
6
.
[in Japanese]
.
Lakshmi
A. A.
&
Raj
S. A.
2022
Natural gum based polymers as additives in enhancing the startup of UASB reactor treating municipal sewage – comparative study
.
Desalin Water Treat.
252
,
89
97
.
https://doi. org/ 10. 5004/ dwt. 2022. 28268
.
Lettinga
G.
,
Rebac
S.
&
Zeeman
G.
2001
Challenge of psychrophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment
.
Trends Biotechnol.
19
(
9
),
363
370
.
Liang
J.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Yoza
B. A.
,
Li
Q. X.
,
Chen
C.
,
Ming
J.
,
Yu
J.
,
Li
J.
&
Ke
M.
2020
Rapid granulation using calcium sulfate and polymers for refractory wastewater treatment in up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor
.
Bioresour. Technol.
305
,
123084
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J biortech.2020.123084
.
Lomte
A. T.
&
Shinde
S. N.
2018
Influence of advanced settling zone on COD removal efficiency of UASB reactor treating dairy wastewater
.
Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol.
5
(
6
),
2716
2719
.
Lowry
O. H.
,
Rosebrough
N. J.
,
Farr
A. L.
&
Randall
R. J.
1951
Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent
.
J. Biol. Chem.
193
,
265
275
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258 (19)52451-6
.
Mamun
M. A. R.
&
Torii
S.
2015
Production of biomethane from cafeteria, vegetable and fruit wastes by anaerobic co-digestion process
.
J. Clean. Energy Technol.
3
,
321
325
.
https://doi.org/10.7763/jocet.2015.v3.216
.
Mazhar
M. A.
,
Khan
N. A.
,
Husain Khan
A.
,
Ahmed
S.
,
Siddiqui
A. A.
,
Husain
A.
,
Rahisuddin
T. V.
,
Islam
S.
,
Shukla
N. K.
,
Changani
F.
,
Yousefi
M.
,
Hassaballa
A. E.
&
Radwan
N.
2021
Upgrading combined anaerobic-aerobic UASB-FPU to UASB-DHS system: cost comparison and performance perspective for developing countries
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
284
,
124723
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124723
.
Owusu-Agyeman
I.
,
Plaza
E.
&
Cetecioglu
Z.
2021
A pilot-scale study of granule-based anaerobic reactors for biogas recovery from municipal wastewater under sub-mesophilic conditions
.
Bioresour Technol.
337
,
125431
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125431
.
Sangamnere
R.
,
Misra
T.
,
Bherwani
H.
,
Kapley
A.
&
Kumar
R.
2023
A critical review of conventional and emerging wastewater treatment technologies
.
Sustainable Water Resour. Manage.
9
,
58
65
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-00829-y
.
Sethi
S.
,
Gupta
R.
,
Bharshankh
A.
,
Sahu
R.
&
Biswas
R.
2023
Celebrating 50 years of microbial granulation technologies: from canonical wastewater management to bio-product recovery
.
Sci. Total Environ.
872
,
162
213
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162213
.
Shivayogimath
C. B.
&
Ramanujam
T. K.
1999
Treatment of distillery spentwash by hybrid UASB reactor
.
Bioprocess Eng.
21
,
255
259
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s004490050673
.
Show
K. Y.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Foong
S. F.
&
Tay
J. H.
2004
Accelerated start-up and enhanced granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors
.
Water Res.
38
,
2293
2304
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.01.039
.
Tiwari
M.
,
Guha
S.
,
Harendranath
C.
&
Tripathi
S.
2005
Enhanced granulation by natural ionic polymer additives in UASB reactor treating low-strength wastewater
.
Water Res.
39
,
3801
3810
.
doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.07.004
.
Valcke
D.
&
Verstraete
W.
1983
A practical method to estimate the acetoclastic methanogenic biomass in anaerobic sludges
.
J. Water Pollut. Contol Fed.
55
,
1191
1195
.
Wang
C.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Gao
X.
,
Chen
H.
,
Xu
X.
&
Zhu
L.
2018
Role of biochar in the granulation of anaerobic sludge and improvement of electron transfer characteristics
.
Bioresour. Technol.
268
,
28
35
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.116
.
Water Environment Federation
2012
APHA, AWWA, WEF. ‘Standard Methods for examination of water and wastewater.’ An. Hidrol. Médica, 5, 185–186
.
Yu
H. Q.
,
Fang
H. H. P.
&
Tay
J. H.
2001
Enhanced sludge granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors by aluminum chloride
.
Chemosphere
44
,
31
36
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00381-7
.
Zhang
Y.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Quan
X.
,
Jing
Y.
&
Dai
S.
2009
Rapid startup of a hybrid UASB-AFF reactor using bi-circulation
.
Chem. Eng. J.
155
,
266
271
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.08.005
.
Zhang
Y.
,
Hu
Q.
,
Wang
T.
,
Jin
Z.
,
Luo
T.
,
Huang
J.
,
Xu
G.
,
Zhan
Y.
&
Wang
H.
2022
Pumice as biological carriers improve impact load resistance of UASB reactors during the treatment of raw incineration leachates
.
Polish J. Environ. Stud.
31
,
1975
1983
.
https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/143254
.
Zhou
W.
,
Imai
T.
,
Ukita
M.
,
Sekine
M.
&
Higuchi
T.
2006
Triggering forces for anaerobic granulation in UASB reactors
.
Process Biochem.
41
,
36
43
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.02.029
.
Zhou
W.
,
Imai
T.
,
Ukita
M.
,
Li
F.
&
Yuasa
A.
2007
Effect of loading rate on the granulation process and granular activity in a bench scale UASB reactor
.
Bioresour. Technol.
98
,
1386
1392
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J biortech.2006.05.035
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).