ABSTRACT
In this study, a potassium ferrate (K2FeO4)-modified biochar (Fe–BC) was prepared and characterized. Afterwards, Fe–BC was applied to activated periodate (PI) to degrade tetracycline (TC), an antibiotic widely used in animal farming. The degradation effects of different systems on TC were compared and the influencing factors were investigated. In addition, several reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by the Fe–BC/PI system were identified, and TC degradation pathways were analyzed. Moreover, the reuse performance of Fe–BC was evaluated. The results exhibited that the Fe–BC/PI system could remove almost 100% of TC under optimal conditions of [BC] = 1.09 g/L, initial [PI] = 3.29 g/L, and initial [TC] = 20.3 mg/L. Cl−, HCO3−, NO3−, and humic acid inhibited TC degradation to varying degrees in the Fe–BC/PI system due to their quenching effects on ROS. TC was degraded into intermediates and even water and carbon dioxide by the synergistic effect of ROS generated and Fe on the BC surface. Fe–BC was reused four times, and the removal rate of TC was still maintained above 80%, indicating the stable nature of Fe–BC.
HIGHLIGHTS
Fe–BC with excellent morphology and composition was successfully prepared.
Fe–BC could effectively activate periodate in degrading tetracycline (TC).
The response surface methodology was utilized to determine the optimum conditions.
The reactive oxygen species generated were responsible for TC degradation.
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, due to the continuous pollution of the water environment, more and more emerging pollutants with negligible concentrations (ng/L–μg/L), such as pesticides, pharmaceuticals, detergents, and flame retardants (Teodosiu et al. 2018), have appeared in both surface water and groundwater. Emerging pollutants are not easily degraded under natural conditions; thus, treating these pollutants at the end of the sewage plant or before the water supply plant will be conducive to the sustainable use of water resources. Conventional methods such as coagulation, filtration, adsorption, and biological oxidation are ineffective in removing stubborn emerging pollutants (Bracamontes-Ruelas et al. 2022). The advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) based on several oxidizing agents (peroxymonosulfate (PMS), peroxydisulfate (PDS), peroxyacetic acid (PAA), and periodate (PI)) have received a lot of attention because of their strong degradation ability for stubborn organic pollutants. These oxidizers can produce some reactive oxygen species (ROS, ·OH, ,
,
,
,
,
) in situ to destroy stubborn organic pollutants as activated by certain means, including ultraviolet (UV), transition metals (Fe, Co, Ni, and Cu), and carbon materials (activated carbon and biochar (BC)). For instance, UV/PMS (Sharma et al. 2015), UV/PDS (Nihemaiti et al. 2018), UV/PAA (Zhang & Huang 2020), UV/PI (Bendjama et al. 2018), Fe/PMS (Li et al. 2021), Co/PDS (Li et al. 2022), Cu/PAA (Wu et al. 2024), Fe–Ni(or Cu)/PI (Lee et al. 2014), activated carbon/PMS (Yang et al. 2015), BC/PDS (Miao et al. 2022), BC/PAA (Zhang et al. 2024), and activated carbon/PI (Li et al. 2016) were applied to treat some organic pollutants (bisphenol A, 4-chlorophenol, phenol, Rhodamine B, chlorazol black, tetracycline (TC), sulfamethoxazole, acid orange 7, and carbamazepine) in water and obtained effective degradation rates.
Compared with the above-mentioned oxidizing agents (PMS, PDS, and PAA), PI is chemically more stable, and there are no residual sulfate ions and less sludge in the reaction process. Moreover, the bond energy of PI is small and easy to activate, and PI can be used to not only oxidize organic matter but also inactivate microorganisms (Sukhatskiy et al. 2023). Among the several methods of activating PI, UV can activate PI to generate ,
, and O(3P) (Song et al. 2024), which can oxidize organic matter or sterilize it. However, the UV activation consumes energy and is affected by the transmittance of the solution. Transition metal activation can ensure high organic removal efficiency (Du et al. 2019); nevertheless, the residual transition metals in the water are prone to cause secondary water pollution (He et al. 2022a, 2022b). In comparison, the activation of PI using BC has excellent effectiveness in removing organic pollutants in water (Oliveira et al. 2017). BC is derived from the pyrolysis of carbon-containing biomass, especially waste biomass, whose reuse has an environmental protection effect (Panahi et al. 2020). BC surface contains several functional groups that can activate PI to generate free or non-free radicals to degrade organic matter (Dai et al. 2023). However, unmodified BC is not rich in functional groups and its ability to activate PI is limited (Song et al. 2023).
The modification of BC via transition metals can lead to the formation of more functional groups on the surface of BC (Wang & Wang 2019). Moreover, the transition metals are immobilized on the surface or in the pores of the BC, which can reduce their leakage into the water, and the transition metals can also synergize with the BC to activate the PI (He et al. 2021). Zhuo et al. (2024) employed a Fe–BC/PI system to remove acetaminophen (ACT, 1 mg/L), resulting in the complete degradation of ACT within 1 min at pH = 11. The main active species generated in this process were ·OH, 1O2, Fe (IV), and , which were responsible for the degradation of ACT. Gong et al. (2024) synthesized an Mn–BC composite and investigated its capacity to degrade methylene blue (MB) in the presence of PI. The results exhibited that 97.4% of MB was removed within 30 min under the synergistic effect of
, 1O2, and ·OH generated in the Mn–BC/PI system. There are also several transition metal-modified BCs such as magnetic Fe–BC (Xiang et al. 2023), Fe/Cu–BC (He et al. 2021), Fe/Mn–BC (He et al. 2022a, 2022b), and MnxOy–BC (Fang et al. 2022), which were used to activate the PI to degrade diphenylamine dithiophosphoric acid, diclofenac sodium, thiacloprid, and oxytetracycline, respectively. Fe, as a transition metal, is cheap and non-toxic; therefore, PI activated via Fe in removing organics is very popular (Su et al. 2023).
In this study, a novel Fe–BC was prepared and characterized. The as-prepared Fe–BC was applied to activate PI to decontaminate TC, a typical antibiotic medicine used in livestock and aquaculture. The effect of the Fe–BC/PI system on TC removal was examined, some influencing factors were optimized via response surface methodology (RSM), and the production of active species and TC degradation pathways were analyzed. This study is expected to provide a reference for researchers studying the degradation of emerging pollutants by the modified BC/PI system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemical reagents
The chemical reagents involved in this study were purchased from two companies. Sodium periodate (NaIO4), potassium pertechnetate (K2FeO4), sodium chloride (NaCl), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), and sodium nitrate (NaNO3) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. TC (C22H24N2O8), humic acid (HA, C9H8Na2O4), tert-butanol (C4H10O), para-benzoquinone (C6H4O2), and furfuryl alcohol (C5H6O2) were purchased from Shanghai McLean Biochemical Technology Co. All these reagents were analytically pure. The water used to prepare the aqueous TC solution was deionized (DI) water.
Preparation and characterization of BC
Primary BC was first prepared. The lees were cleaned with DI water, ground into powder, screened for 80 mesh, and placed in a tube furnace for pyrolysis. The pyrolysis conditions were as follows: nitrogen flow rate of 100 mL/min, heating rate of 10 °C/min, and end temperature of 800 °C (maintained for 2 h). Primary BC was obtained at the end of the pyrolysis process. In the preparation of modified BC, the lees powder (80 mesh, 10 g) was first mixed and stirred with potassium pertechnetate (4 g) and then pyrolyzed in a tube furnace. The pyrolysis conditions were the same as those of the primary BC. The modified BC obtained was denoted as Fe–BC. The prepared materials were characterized by the scanning electron microscope (SEM, ZEISS MERLIN Compact, Germany), the energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS, Thermo Scientific K-Alpha + , USA), and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku Ultima IV, Japan) to explore their morphology, elemental composition, and compound forms.
Experimental methods
The reactor used in the experiment was a 250-mL beaker. The beaker was filled with 100 mL of aqueous TC solution (20 mg/L), BC (or Fe–BC, 0.1 g), PI (0.33 g), and BC (or Fe–BC, 0.1 g) + PI (0.33 g) according to the designed program, and the solution was stirred with a magnetic stirrer to trigger a reaction. The sampling times were 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min. The residual TC concentration was measured at 370 nm via a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (TU-1810, Beijing Pure Analytics General Co.).
The effects of pH, temperature, Cl−, ,
, and HA on TC degradation were investigated with the following parameter ranges: pH (3, 6, and 9), temperature (15, 25, and 35°C), anions Cl−,
,
(10 and 20 mg/L), and HA (5 and 10 mg/L).
After the experiment was completed, the spent Fe–BC in solution was extracted by vacuum filtration and washed repeatedly with DI water, dried, and used to repeat the experiment to examine the stability of the Fe–BC in the PI-AOP system.
Quenching experiments were carried out to investigate the ROS generated in the Fe–BC/PI system. Quenching agents such as tert-butanol (TBA), furfuryl alcohol (FFA), and p-benzoquinone (p-BQ) were chosen to quench ·OH, 1O2, and based on differences in the corresponding reaction rate constants. The parameters of the reaction were the Fe–BC dosage of 1.09 g/L, the PI concentration of 3.29 g/L, the TC concentration of 20.3 mg/L, and the temperature of 25 °C. The molar ratio of TBA:PI was 1000:1, the FFA concentration was 0.2 M, and the p-BQ concentration was 5 mM.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Characterization results
SEM image of (a) BC and (b) Fe–BC; (c) EDS spectrum of Fe–BC; and (d) XRD patterns of Fe–BC and BC.
SEM image of (a) BC and (b) Fe–BC; (c) EDS spectrum of Fe–BC; and (d) XRD patterns of Fe–BC and BC.
Comparison of different conditions for TC degradation
TC removal under different systems. Conditions: [TC] = 20 mg/L, [BC] = [Fe–BC] = 1 g/L, [PI] = 3.3 g/L, T = 25°C, and pH = 3.
TC removal under different systems. Conditions: [TC] = 20 mg/L, [BC] = [Fe–BC] = 1 g/L, [PI] = 3.3 g/L, T = 25°C, and pH = 3.
Several factors optimized via the RSM
With the help of Design Expert 10 software, RSM analysis was performed based on the Box–Behnken design with the initial PI concentration, initial Fe–BC dosage, and initial TC concentration as the independent variables and the TC removal as the response value. The initial pH was 6, the reaction time was 150 min, and the reaction temperature was 25 °C in each experimental protocol. The levels and coding of the influencing factors are shown in Table 1. The specific protocols and the corresponding TC removals are exhibited in Table 2. Through software analysis, the relationship between the variables and the response values conformed to the quadratic polynomial regression equation (Equation (1)). Table 3 presents the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for TC removal. In Table 3, the corresponding p-value under the model hierarchy was <0.0001, and the F-value was 39.96. For the RSM model, a larger F-value and a smaller p-value mean a more realistic model fit. If the p-value was less than 0.05, the model was considered significant (Ntambwe Kambuyi et al. 2019). The model of this experiment was more significant with a p-value of <0.0001. The F-value of the misfit level was 0.3580, which indicated that the misfit term was not significant, indicating a high level of modeling accuracy. Furthermore, the R2 of the model was 0.9809 and CV% was 0.9743%. Both values similarly illustrated the applicability of the model.
Factor levels of experiment design
Factors . | Variables . | Levels . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
− 1 . | 0 . | 1 . | ||
PI concentration (g/L) | A | 1.1 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
Fe–BC dosage (g/L) | B | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
TC concentration (g/L) | C | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
Factors . | Variables . | Levels . | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
− 1 . | 0 . | 1 . | ||
PI concentration (g/L) | A | 1.1 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
Fe–BC dosage (g/L) | B | 0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 |
TC concentration (g/L) | C | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
Operating parameters and removal rates of TC
Run . | A . | B . | C . | Response: TC removal (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 81.1 |
2 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 78.2 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82.3 |
4 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 83.6 |
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 90.6 |
6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 83.0 |
7 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 92.3 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.8 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84.8 |
10 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 87.1 |
11 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 90.3 |
12 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 88.0 |
13 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 79.1 |
14 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 81.6 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84.4 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.4 |
17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 85.1 |
Run . | A . | B . | C . | Response: TC removal (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 81.1 |
2 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 78.2 |
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82.3 |
4 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 83.6 |
5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 90.6 |
6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 83.0 |
7 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 92.3 |
8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.8 |
9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84.8 |
10 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 87.1 |
11 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 90.3 |
12 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 88.0 |
13 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 79.1 |
14 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 81.6 |
15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84.4 |
16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 83.4 |
17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 85.1 |
ANOVA for TC removal
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean square . | F-value . | p-Value . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 244.54 | 9 | 27.17 | 39.96 | <0.0001 | Significant |
A | 136.95 | 1 | 136.95 | 201.42 | <0.0001 | |
B | 10.58 | 1 | 10.58 | 15.56 | 0.0056 | |
C | 86.46 | 1 | 86.46 | 127.16 | <0.0001 | |
AB | 0.5625 | 1 | 0.5625 | 0.8273 | 0.3933 | |
AC | 0.8100 | 1 | 0.8100 | 1.19 | 0.3112 | |
BC | 0.2025 | 1 | 0.2025 | 0.2978 | 0.6022 | |
A2 | 0.0380 | 1 | 0.0380 | 0.0559 | 0.8199 | |
B2 | 2.90 | 1 | 2.90 | 4.27 | 0.0777 | |
C2 | 5.62 | 1 | 5.62 | 8.26 | 0.0238 | |
Residual | 4.76 | 7 | 0.6799 | |||
Lack of fit | 1.01 | 3 | 0.3358 | 0.3580 | 0.7874 | Not significant |
Pure error | 3.75 | 4 | 0.9380 | |||
Cor total | 249.30 | 16 |
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean square . | F-value . | p-Value . | . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 244.54 | 9 | 27.17 | 39.96 | <0.0001 | Significant |
A | 136.95 | 1 | 136.95 | 201.42 | <0.0001 | |
B | 10.58 | 1 | 10.58 | 15.56 | 0.0056 | |
C | 86.46 | 1 | 86.46 | 127.16 | <0.0001 | |
AB | 0.5625 | 1 | 0.5625 | 0.8273 | 0.3933 | |
AC | 0.8100 | 1 | 0.8100 | 1.19 | 0.3112 | |
BC | 0.2025 | 1 | 0.2025 | 0.2978 | 0.6022 | |
A2 | 0.0380 | 1 | 0.0380 | 0.0559 | 0.8199 | |
B2 | 2.90 | 1 | 2.90 | 4.27 | 0.0777 | |
C2 | 5.62 | 1 | 5.62 | 8.26 | 0.0238 | |
Residual | 4.76 | 7 | 0.6799 | |||
Lack of fit | 1.01 | 3 | 0.3358 | 0.3580 | 0.7874 | Not significant |
Pure error | 3.75 | 4 | 0.9380 | |||
Cor total | 249.30 | 16 |
(a) Predicted value and actual value; (b) the effect of Fe–BC dosage and PI concentration on TC removal; (c) the effect of TC concentration and PI concentration on TC removal; and (d) the effect of Fe–BC dosage and TC concentration on TC removal.
(a) Predicted value and actual value; (b) the effect of Fe–BC dosage and PI concentration on TC removal; (c) the effect of TC concentration and PI concentration on TC removal; and (d) the effect of Fe–BC dosage and TC concentration on TC removal.
Effect of other factors on TC degradation





Some factors affecting TC degradation: (a) pH; (b) temperature; (c) Cl−; (d) ; (e)
; (f) HA. Conditions: [BC] = 1.09 g/L, [PI] = 3.29 g/L, [TC] = 20.3 mg/L, pH = 3.0, and T = 25 °C (unless otherwise specified).
Some factors affecting TC degradation: (a) pH; (b) temperature; (c) Cl−; (d) ; (e)
; (f) HA. Conditions: [BC] = 1.09 g/L, [PI] = 3.29 g/L, [TC] = 20.3 mg/L, pH = 3.0, and T = 25 °C (unless otherwise specified).
Reuse performance of Fe–BC
BC reuse performance assessment. Conditions: [Fe–BC] = 1.09 g/L, [PI] = 3.29 g/L, [TC] = 20.3 mg/L, pH = 3.0, and T = 25 °C.
BC reuse performance assessment. Conditions: [Fe–BC] = 1.09 g/L, [PI] = 3.29 g/L, [TC] = 20.3 mg/L, pH = 3.0, and T = 25 °C.
Recognition of ROS




Inhibition by quenching agents. Conditions: [Fe–BC] = 1.09 g/L, [PI] = 3.29 g/L, [TC] = 20.3 mg/L, pH = 3.0, T = 25 °C, [TBA]:[PI] = 1,000:1, [FFA] = 0.2 M, and [BQ] = 5 mM.
Inhibition by quenching agents. Conditions: [Fe–BC] = 1.09 g/L, [PI] = 3.29 g/L, [TC] = 20.3 mg/L, pH = 3.0, T = 25 °C, [TBA]:[PI] = 1,000:1, [FFA] = 0.2 M, and [BQ] = 5 mM.
Degradation pathways of TC


CONCLUSION
In this paper, a Fe–BC was prepared using waste wine lees biomass raw material and potassium pertechnetate and used to activate PI in the treatment of antibiotic TC. The performance, influencing factors, and mechanism of TC degradation by PI systems were investigated, and the following conclusions were drawn:
(1) Unlike pristine BC, Fe–BC had a stronger ability to activate PI on removing TC. Under the same conditions, Fe–BC could remove 99.2% of TC, which was 16.6% higher than BC.
(2) After the optimization of PI concentration, Fe–BC dosage, and TC concentration by the RSM, the optimum conditions were obtained as follows: [PI] = 3.29 g/L, [Fe–BC] = 1.09 g/L, and [TC] = 20.3 mg/L.
(3) Cl−,
,
, and HA could slightly inhibit TC degradation in the Fe–BC/PI system at the given range in this study due to their quenching effects on ROS.
(4) Using quenching experiments, ROS in the Fe–BC/PI reaction system were identified, and ·OH, 1O2, and
were considered responsible for TC removal. Moreover, TC could be degraded into final products via three pathways.
(5) Fe–BC was reused four times, and TC removal was above 80%, suggesting a stable performance of Fe–BC.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the Department of Education of Jilin Province (No. JJKH20241674KJ and JJKH20241679KJ) for the financial support.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.