To solve the problem of low removal rate and poor N2 selectivity in direct electrochemical ammonia oxidation (EAO), commercial Ni foam and Cu foam were used as anode and cathode of the EAO system, respectively. The coupling effect between the cathode and anode promoted nitrogen cycling during the reaction process, which improved N2 selectivity of the reaction system and promoted it to achieve a high ammonia removal rate. This study showed that the thin Ni(OH)2 with oxygen vacancy formed on the surface of Ni foam anode played an effective role in the dimerization of intermediate products in ammonia oxidation to form N2. This electrochemical system was used to treat real goose wastewater containing 422.5 mg/L NH4+-N and 94.5 mg/L total organic carbon (TOC). After treatment, this electrochemical system achieved good performance with an ammonia removal rate of 87%, N2 selectivity of 77%, and TOC removal rate of 72%. Therefore, this simple and efficient system with Ni foam anode and Cu foam cathode is a promising method for treating ammonia nitrogen wastewater.

  • The use of commercial electrodes has increased the practicality of this system.

  • The anode was responsible for the ammonia oxidation.

  • The cathode was responsible for the reduction of nitrate.

  • The nitrogen cycle between the electrodes enabled this system to achieve high performance.

  • The electrochemical system had achieved significant results in practical goose wastewater treatment.

High-concentration ammonia in landfill leachate, farmland drainage, and industrial wastewater lead to black odor and eutrophication in water bodies, which poses a huge threat to the environment (Mai et al. 2021; Liu et al. 2023a; Zhou & Wang 2023). Compared with traditional processing technologies such as biological treatment (Zulkifli et al. 2022), membrane separation (Li & Jin 2022), breakpoint chlorination (Huang et al. 2022; Zhang et al. 2022), ozonation (Krisbiantoro et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2021), and photocatalysis (Zhang et al. 2020b), electrochemical ammonia oxidation (EAO) method has advantages of good tolerance to toxic pollutants, small reactor scale and simple operation (Bunce & Bejan 2011; Ding et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2020a; AlJaberi et al. 2023; Bao et al. 2023). Moreover, in the future, the development of nuclear power plants will greatly reduce the cost of electricity usage.

There are two pathways for EAO: indirect and direct oxidation. Indirect EAO refers to the rapid oxidation of ammonia through powerful oxidants, especially radicals containing chlorine (Yao et al. 2019; Cifcioglu-Gozuacik et al. 2021; Sun et al. 2021; Chen et al. 2022; Kuang et al. 2022; Li et al. 2023). However, indirect EAO requires a large amount of chloride salts and is prone to producing toxic chlorination byproducts in the presence of organic matter (Hao et al. 2022; Feng et al. 2023; Jiang et al. 2023). Direct EAO is the process of direct electron loss of ammonia at the interface of electrocatalysts (Zhao et al. 2021; He et al. 2022; Hou et al. 2023; Rahardjo & Shih 2023; Zhang et al. 2023). The mechanism of direct EAO involves the adsorption of ammonia on the electrocatalyst surface followed by dehydrogenation reactions and spontaneous oxidation to N2, as shown in the reaction Equations (1)–(4) (Almomani & Saad 2021; Wallace et al. 2021):
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Noble metal-based materials are ideal electrocatalysts for EAO because of its relatively fast rate and high N2 selectivity (Skachkov et al. 2013; Kang et al. 2017; Yang et al. 2021; Pillai et al. 2023). However, the high cost and low resistance to poisoning inhibit their industrial-grade applications. Transition metal materials can also effectively promote EAO (He et al. 2022), especially Ni-based materials (Almomani et al. 2020; Almomani & Saad 2021; He et al. 2021; Hou et al. 2023; Rahardjo & Shih 2023). Research has shown that on the surface Ni(OH)2-based electrocatalysts could improve EAO performance (Shih et al. 2018a, 2018b; Hou et al. 2023). However, there are currently issues with the cumbersome preparation process of Ni(OH)2-based electrocatalysts and the easy accumulation of byproducts ( and ) during the reaction process, as shown in the reaction Equations (5)–(8) (Almomani et al. 2020; Rahardjo & Shih 2023):
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

To address these issues, it is necessary to design an easily obtainable and efficient Ni(OH)2-based electrocatalyst. In this study, commercial Ni foam was used as an anode to in situ produce active Ni(OH)2 through the EAO process. The Ni(OH)2 generated may exhibit different physical and chemical states, and it may show different EAO performance. The EAO performance of Ni(OH)2 at different current densities, pH and initial concentrations were studied in detail. Characterization of the physical and chemical states of Ni(OH)2 were tested using X-ray diffractometer (XRD), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). This electrochemical system had also been applied to treat goose-raising wastewater containing high concentrations of ammonia.

EAO experiments

The EAO experiments were conducted in a single chamber reactor with a reaction solution volume of 100 mL. Foam metal materials (Suzhou Taili Foam Metal Factory (Jiangsu, China), Fe (1.0 × 20 × 30 mm) or Cu (1.6 × 20 × 30 mm) or Ni (1.0 × 20 × 30 mm)) was used as anode for EAO, and the Pt mesh (10 × 10 mm) or Cu foam (1.6 × 10 × 10 mm) was used as cathode. The reaction solution consisted of 11.11 mg/mL Na2SO4 and (27.78, 55.56 or 111.12 mg/L). The electrolyte pH was adjusted by a 1.0 M NaOH solution. These EAO experiments were repeated in triplicate, and the average results were reported. All reagents were analytical. Deionized water was used throughout this study. All experiments were conducted at constant ambient temperature (25 ± 0.5 °C).

Analytical methods

The electrochemical surface area (ECSA) was evaluated in a solution of 11.11 mg/mL Na2SO4 at different scan rates (100, 75, 50, 25, 10, and 5 mV s−1), as reported by the studies (Cerrón-Calle et al. 2023). The relevant calculation results are shown in Supplementary material, Figure S1. The electrochemical active areas of Ni foam (1.0 mm × 20 mm ×30 mm) and Cu foam (1.6 mm × 10 mm ×10 mm) used were 10 and 5 cm2, respectively. In the entire text, the calculation of current density uses electrochemical active area instead of two-dimensional area. The surface morphology and elemental distribution of the Ni(OH)2 generated were characterized by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FE-SEM, Merlin, Zeiss 152 Co., Berlin, Germany) coupled with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The crystalline structure was determined by XRD (X'Pert PRO MRD, PANalytical, the Netherlands). The surface chemical composition and heteroatom distribution were analyzed by XPS (ESCALAB250Xi, Thermo Fisher Scientific Waltham, MA). The concentrations of Ni and Cu ions were measured by inductively coupled plasma-mass 110 spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent 7700ce, Santa Clara, CA). Cyclic voltammetry curve, chronopotentiometry, and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) experiments were carried out at an electrochemical workstation (Chenhua, CHI660E, Shanghai, China). A saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and Pt wire (5 mm diameter) were used as the reference and counter electrode, respectively. The concentrations of , , and were determined with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-2600, Shimadzu, Japan). The gaseous samples (NOx) were withdrawn from the reactors and subsequently detected using a 7,890A gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies Inc., CA, USA). Considering that the concentration of nitrogen oxides detected was very low, it could be ignored. The concentrations of total organic carbon (TOC) in actual goose farming wastewater were tested by a TOC instrument (TOC-L organic carbon analyzer, Shimadzu, Japan).

Selection of Ni foam anode–Cu foam cathode

In order to prove the high efficiency of Ni foam anode during ammonia oxidation, commercial Fe foam, Cu foam and Ni foam were used as anodes, respectively, and Pt mesh was used as a cathode. As shown in Figure 1(a), Ni foam anode exhibited a high ammonia oxidation removal rate. This may be because during the electrolysis process, Ni(OH)2, which has a positive effect on EAO (Shih et al. 2018a, 2018b; Hou et al. 2023), may be generated on the surface of Ni foam anode surface. The iron oxide or copper oxide compounds generated on the surfaces of Fe and Cu anodes may have low chemical adsorption activation performance for ammonia. As shown in Figure 1(b), after 150 min of reaction, the removal rate of ammonia reached nearly 100% and the N2 selectivity was 71%, when Ni foam was used as anode.
Figure 1

(a) Ammonia removal on different anodes, (b) ammonia removal and N2 selectivity with different cathodes, (c) nitrate removal on different cathodes, (d) time-dependent pH (experimental conditions: [Na2SO4] = 11.11 mg/mL, anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2, initial pH = 7.45, initial [] = 55.56 mg/L in (a, b) and (d) and initial [ = 77.78 mg/L in (c)).

Figure 1

(a) Ammonia removal on different anodes, (b) ammonia removal and N2 selectivity with different cathodes, (c) nitrate removal on different cathodes, (d) time-dependent pH (experimental conditions: [Na2SO4] = 11.11 mg/mL, anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2, initial pH = 7.45, initial [] = 55.56 mg/L in (a, b) and (d) and initial [ = 77.78 mg/L in (c)).

Close modal

In order to improve the N2 selectivity of EAO progress, Cu foam with recognized good electrochemical reduction of nitrate performance among commercial electrode materials was selected as the cathode (Li et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2022; Bi et al. 2023), and the influence of area of Cu foam cathode on EAO performance was studied, as shown in Figure 1(b). When Cu foam was used as a cathode instead of Pt mesh, the removal rate of ammonia remained at nearly 100%, and the N2 selectivity of the system increased from 71 to 85%. This may be because nitrate, which was the oxidation product of EAO on the anode, had a faster reduction reaction at the Cu foam cathode interface than at Pt mesh interface. This viewpoint had also been validated in experimental results using nitrate as a reactant and Cu foam and Pt mesh as cathodes, respectively (Figure 1(c)) with Ni foam anode. The generated ammonia at the Cu foam cathode could be transferred to the anode interface for oxidation. Therefore, no ammonia was detected in the experiment using nitrate as the reactant. This nitrogen cycle made the EAO reaction more towards the reaction direction of generating N2.

In addition, when the area of the Cu foam cathode increased without changing the anode current density, the removal rate of ammonia decreased. It may be that the reduction reaction rate of the generated nitrate slowed down in kinetics at the cathode interface, which led to the accumulation of ammonia oxidation products, thus blocking the EAO reaction. On the other hand, it may be due to the decrease in cathode current density leading to a slower hydrogen evolution reaction, resulting in a decrease in the pH value of the reaction solution. The changes in the pH value of the corresponding solution during the electrolysis process are shown in Figure 1(d). Works of literature have shown that pH values in the range of 7–12 are conducive to EAO reaction. As the pH value increased, the concentration of deionized ammonia increased, and more ammonia was present in the EAO reaction (Almomani et al. 2020; Almomani & Saad 2021; Liu et al. 2023b). To sum up, the EAO performance was further evaluated with Ni foam anode and Cu foam cathode.

Effect of anode current density and initial pH

The effect of anode current density on the EAO was investigated, and the relevant results are presented in Figure 2(a). The increasing current density from 6.25 to 25.00 mA/cm2 dramatically increased the reaction rate. This was because the strong electric driving force generated more active substances for EAO at the anode interface. Moreover, ammonia almost disappeared at 25.00 mA/cm2 after electrolysis of 150 min. The influence of initial pH (pH = 7.45, 9.40, 11.70, 12.62, and 13.01) was examined, and the time-dependent results are presented in Figure 2(b). The rate of EAO was sensitive to the solution pH. Upon 150 min of electrolysis, virtually complete ammonia oxidation was achieved under initial pH values of 7.45 and 9.40. When the initial pH value was 11.7, the remaining concentration of was 28.7 mg/L. When initial pH values were 12.62 and 13.01, there was almost no reaction of EAO. This may be because when pH values were 7.45 and 9.40, ammonia existed in molecular form in the electrolyte, which was easily oxidized (Almomani et al. 2020; Almomani & Saad 2021). As the pH value increased (11.7, 12.62 and 13.01), more oxygen evolution reactions occurred at the anode interface in strongly alkaline solutions, which may hinder the mass transfer of ammonia molecules.
Figure 2

Effects of (a) anode current density and (b) initial pH on ammonia removal, (c) time-dependent pH (experimental conditions: [Na2SO4] = 11.11 mg/mL, initial [] = 55.56 mg/L, initial pH = 7.45 in (a) and anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2 in (b)).

Figure 2

Effects of (a) anode current density and (b) initial pH on ammonia removal, (c) time-dependent pH (experimental conditions: [Na2SO4] = 11.11 mg/mL, initial [] = 55.56 mg/L, initial pH = 7.45 in (a) and anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2 in (b)).

Close modal

The control experiment of NH3 volatilization at different pH values with identical operation conditions without applying current was carried out. When the pH value was high, which was a higher value than NH3 pKa (9.25), the volatilization of NH3 had indeed occurred, especially within 5 min after preparing the ammonia nitrogen solution, and the small amount of ammonia volatilization afterwards can be almost ignored. The residual amount of ammonia nitrogen after volatilization is shown in Supplementary material, Figure S2. As the pH value increased, the volatilization of ammonia increased. When the initial pH value of the ammonia solution (55.56 mg/L ) was 13.01, the volatilization of ammonia was 10.5%. Comparing Figure 2(b), it can be seen that the removal of ammonia nitrogen was still mainly due to the EAO process. The changes in pH values during the electrolysis process are shown in Figure 2(c). When initial pH values were 7.45 and 9.40, the pH values increased with increasing time. This was because compared to the oxidation reaction of the anode, the hydrogen evolution reaction of the cathode was more intense with a large cathode current density. When the initial pH values were 11.70, 12.62, and 13.01, the pH of the solution remained almost unchanged with the increase of electrolysis time, although the EAO reaction weakened at this time. Within these pH ranges, anodic oxidation reactions (enhanced oxygen evolution reaction and weakened EAO reaction) and the cathodic reduction reaction (hydrogen evolution reaction) may reach the balance of gain and loss of electrons.

Effect of initial NH4+ -N concentration

The influence of initial concentration on EAO performance was also studied. As shown in Figure 3(a), the time required for almost complete removal of was 150 min in relation to initial concentrations of 27.78 or 55.56 mg/L. When the initial concentration of ammonia was 111.12 mg/L, after 150 min of electrolysis, the remaining concentration was 8.33 mg/L. Figure 3(b) suggested that nitrate was a product of this EAO, and the possible intermediate product nitrite was not observed particularly during EAO process with different initial concentrations. Figure 3(c) displays the rate constants under different initial concentration conditions. The increasing concentration from 27.78 to 55.56 mg/L yielded an increased reaction rate, which can be explained by the larger amounts of adsorbed onto the electrode surface, thus favoring EAO. However, when the initial concentration of was 111.12 mg/L, the removal rate decreased, which was likely due to the fact that the reaction ability on the electrode surface was limited at the applied anode current density of 25.00 mA/cm2. The effect of different initial ammonia concentrations on N2 selectivity in EAO process is shown in Figure 3(d). With the progress of electrolysis time and the increase of initial concentration, the N2 selectivity showed a continuous increasing trend. This may be due to the continuous electrolysis process, where more active substances were generated on the surface of the Ni anode. When the initial concentration of ammonia increased, the amounts of ammonia adsorbed and activated on the anode surface increased, which may enhance the binding process of the intermediate product *NHx, thereby enhancing the reaction kinetics of electrooxidation reaction to generate N2. This phenomenon has also been seen in other literatures (Rahardjo & Shih 2022, 2023). When the initial ammonia concentration was 111.12 mg/L, after 150 min of electrolysis, the N2 selectivity stabilized at 90%.
Figure 3

Effect of initial concentration on electrochemical ammonia oxidation performance: time-dependent variations in the concentrations of (a) , (b) , (c) comparisons of (a) the rate constants; and (d) nitrogen selectivity (experimental conditions: [Na2SO4] = 11.11 mg/mL, initial [] = 55.56 mg/L, initial pH = 7.45, anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2).

Figure 3

Effect of initial concentration on electrochemical ammonia oxidation performance: time-dependent variations in the concentrations of (a) , (b) , (c) comparisons of (a) the rate constants; and (d) nitrogen selectivity (experimental conditions: [Na2SO4] = 11.11 mg/mL, initial [] = 55.56 mg/L, initial pH = 7.45, anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2).

Close modal

It was worth noting that Ni or Cu ions were not detected in the treated wastewater. The theoretical pH of the solution for Ni2+ precipitation of Ni(OH)2 is 7.1 (Mo et al. 2021; Smoak & Schnoor 2022), while the initial pH of the reaction solution was 7.45. The anode area was higher than the area of the cathode area, which resulted in a cathode current density that was higher than the anode current density. Therefore, the pH of the solution kept rising during the reaction (Figure 1(d)), which led to the formation of Ni(OH)2 on the Ni foam in situ, and no Ni ion was detected in the solution. On the other hand, when Cu foam was used as cathode material, under the protection of a negative electric field and the alkaline solution, it was difficult for Cu to be dissolved. Therefore, Cu ions were difficult to generate in the solution. In addition, the Pourbaix diagram of Cu and Ni also indicated that metal ions were difficult to precipitate under such reaction conditions.

Evidence of Ni(OH)2 generation

The XRD technique was used to determine the crystalline structure of the substance generated on the Ni foam anode after 150 min of reaction (Figure 4(a)). Compared with the XRD spectrum of pure Ni foam (Zhang et al. 2019; Xu et al. 2021; You et al. 2023), the XRD spectrum of the sample showed the additional characteristic peaks of Ni(OH)2 after the reaction. These results also showed that after the reaction, Ni foam was not completely converted into Ni(OH)2. The SEM images in Figure 4(b) showed that the generated Ni(OH)2 material was composed of nanosheet materials, and the nanosheet thickness was approximately 5 nm. The SEM-EDS in Supplementary material, Figure S3 also confirmed that the generated substance was Ni(OH)2.
Figure 4

(a) XRD patterns, (b) SEM images of substance generated on the surface of Ni foam anode after reaction, high-resolution (b) Ni 2p and (c) O 1s XPS spectra.

Figure 4

(a) XRD patterns, (b) SEM images of substance generated on the surface of Ni foam anode after reaction, high-resolution (b) Ni 2p and (c) O 1s XPS spectra.

Close modal

The XPS analysis was performed to study the chemical nature of Ni(OH)2 generated. As shown in Supplementary material, Figure S4, XPS peaks of Ni and O were detected in the survey scan. The high-resolution Ni2p spectra are depicted in Figure 4(c), two peaks at 854.3 and 872.0 eV corresponded to Ni2+, and the other two peaks at 859.7 and 878.0 eV belonged to the characteristic peak shake-up satellites. The Ni2p binding energies negatively shifted compared with Ni2p in pure Ni(OH)2 (Song et al. 2021). This made it easier for the electrode surface to adsorb NH3 instead of OHad, which can promote the dimerization of intermediate products (*NHx) to form N2 (Hou et al. 2023). As shown in Figure 4(d), the high-resolution O1s spectra of Ni(OH)2 generated were fitted with two peaks. The characteristic peak at 529.06 eV was attributed to surface lattice oxygen in the metal-oxygen bond. The characteristic peak at 531.8 eV corresponding to oxygen vacancies was remarkable. The oxygen vacancies should be relevant to the hydroxyl groups and adsorbed O− or species (Xue & Feng 2021; Hao et al. 2023). The surface oxygen species alter the electron state of Ni, and this was consistent with the negative shift of binding energy in the XPS results of Ni2p.

LSV tests

The EAO performance with Ni foam anode and Cu foam cathode was also confirmed by LSV tests. Compared with the fresh and used Ni foam anodes in LSV tests with or without 55.56 mg/L in Figure 5(a) and 5(b), LSV curves of the used Ni foam anode showed an obvious increase in anode current compared with the fresh anode, which implied that the process of direct electron transfer can occur on the interface of Ni(OH)2 generated during EAO reaction (Skachkov et al. 2013; Hou et al. 2023; Zhang et al. 2023). The performance of the used Ni foam used as anode again in the EAO process is shown in Supplementary material, Figure S5. Compared with the fresh Ni foam anode, it showed a faster ammonia removal rate, which was due to the active Ni(OH)2 formed already on the anode surface. In addition, LSV tests of Cu foam and Pt mesh cathodes with or without 77.78 mg/L were compared. While the Pt mesh was used as the working electrode, there was no significant change in cathode current in LSV curves. When Cu foam was used instead of Pt mesh, there was an obvious phenomenon that the cathode current increased, and this was consistent with the experimental results in Figure 1(c). These experimental results qualitatively indicated that nitrate can be reduced at the cathode interface of Cu foam, thus promoting the nitrogen cycle in the EAO system.
Figure 5

LSV curves of (a) fresh and (b) used in the absence and presence of ; and (c) Pt mesh and (d) Cu foam in the absence and presence of (scanning rate of 10 mV/s).

Figure 5

LSV curves of (a) fresh and (b) used in the absence and presence of ; and (c) Pt mesh and (d) Cu foam in the absence and presence of (scanning rate of 10 mV/s).

Close modal
Based on all the above experimental data, we summarized the possible reaction pathways in this EAO system, which explained the coupling between the Ni foam anode and the Cu foam cathode. The synergies promoted the nitrogen cycle process in this system, and thus improved the ammonia removal rate and N2 selectivity, as illustrated in Figure 6. Comparisons of the EAO performance were made between our electrochemical system and those in the literature about Ni-based anodes. In Table 1, compared to other Ni-based anodes, Ni(OH)2 in this study exhibited excellent ammonia removal efficiency and N2 selectivity, which was attributed to the unique chemical state and morphology of the generated Ni(OH)2, and the coupling effect between the anode and cathode.
Table 1

Comparisons of the EAO performance about Ni-based anodes

AnodeElectrolyteVoltage/current densityReaction timeRemove rateN2 selectivityReferences
Ni(OH)2/NiOOH C(NH3-N) = 50 mg/L
pH = 11
C(Na2SO4) = 0.01 M 
1.5 mA/cm2 420 min 98.5% 47% Shih et al. (2018b)  
Ni(OH)2/NiOOH C(NH3-N) = 20 mg/L
pH = 11
C(Na2SO4) = 0.1 M 
0.85 V vs. Hg/HgO 360 min 98% 20% Shih et al. (2018a)  
Ni/Ni(OH)2 C(NH3-N) = 34.4 mg/L
pH = 11
C(NaClO4) = 1 M 
20 mA/cm2 720 min 56.45% 28.5% Kapałka et al. (2010)  
Ag/Ni400 C(NH3-N) = 50 mg/L
-
C(Na2SO4) = 0.1 M 
3 mA/cm2 240 min 99.5% 85% Rahardjo & Shih (2023)  
Ni(OH)2/SnO2 C(NH3-N) = 140 mg/L
pH = 11
C(K2SO4) = 0.5 M 
1.55 V vs. RHE 180 min 35% 84.2% Hou et al. (2023)  
NiCu3-N-C DAC C(NH3-N) = 38.9 mg/L
C(NaOH) = 0.25 M 
1.50 V vs. RHE. 300 min 99.16% 97.87% Zhang et al. (2023)  
PtNi/G C(NH3-N) = 50 mg/L
C(Na2SO4) = 0.1 M 
1 mA/cm2 360 min 84.1% 12% Rahardjo & Shih (2022)  
NiO/TiO2 C(NH3-N) = 2,800 mg/L
pH = 9
C(NaNO3) = 100 mM 
30 mA/cm2 540 min 96.4% ≥90% Almomani et al. (2020)  
Ni(OH)2/Ni Foam C(NH3-N) = 111.12 mg/L
C(Na2SO4) = 78 mM 
25.00 mA/cm2 150 min 92.5% 90% This study 
AnodeElectrolyteVoltage/current densityReaction timeRemove rateN2 selectivityReferences
Ni(OH)2/NiOOH C(NH3-N) = 50 mg/L
pH = 11
C(Na2SO4) = 0.01 M 
1.5 mA/cm2 420 min 98.5% 47% Shih et al. (2018b)  
Ni(OH)2/NiOOH C(NH3-N) = 20 mg/L
pH = 11
C(Na2SO4) = 0.1 M 
0.85 V vs. Hg/HgO 360 min 98% 20% Shih et al. (2018a)  
Ni/Ni(OH)2 C(NH3-N) = 34.4 mg/L
pH = 11
C(NaClO4) = 1 M 
20 mA/cm2 720 min 56.45% 28.5% Kapałka et al. (2010)  
Ag/Ni400 C(NH3-N) = 50 mg/L
-
C(Na2SO4) = 0.1 M 
3 mA/cm2 240 min 99.5% 85% Rahardjo & Shih (2023)  
Ni(OH)2/SnO2 C(NH3-N) = 140 mg/L
pH = 11
C(K2SO4) = 0.5 M 
1.55 V vs. RHE 180 min 35% 84.2% Hou et al. (2023)  
NiCu3-N-C DAC C(NH3-N) = 38.9 mg/L
C(NaOH) = 0.25 M 
1.50 V vs. RHE. 300 min 99.16% 97.87% Zhang et al. (2023)  
PtNi/G C(NH3-N) = 50 mg/L
C(Na2SO4) = 0.1 M 
1 mA/cm2 360 min 84.1% 12% Rahardjo & Shih (2022)  
NiO/TiO2 C(NH3-N) = 2,800 mg/L
pH = 9
C(NaNO3) = 100 mM 
30 mA/cm2 540 min 96.4% ≥90% Almomani et al. (2020)  
Ni(OH)2/Ni Foam C(NH3-N) = 111.12 mg/L
C(Na2SO4) = 78 mM 
25.00 mA/cm2 150 min 92.5% 90% This study 
Figure 6

The possible coupling between the Ni foam anode and the Cu foam cathode promoted the nitrogen cycle process in this EAO system.

Figure 6

The possible coupling between the Ni foam anode and the Cu foam cathode promoted the nitrogen cycle process in this EAO system.

Close modal

EAO system for removing ammonium in real goose-raising wastewater

The real aquaculture wastewater was taken from a goose factory in Pengta Town, Huoqiu County, Lu'an City, Anhui Province, China. The wastewater contained certain amounts of insoluble solid matter, ammonium, and organic compound (marked as TOC). The wastewater was first treated with a 0.45 μm filter membrane to remove suspended solids. The feasibility of treating ammonium in real goose-raising wastewater by using the Ni foam anode with Cu foam cathode system was verified by conducting electrochemical experiments. To test the oxidation performance of this electrochemical system, we diluted the aquaculture wastewater with deionized water for the experiment. The electrolysis time was 4, 7, 9, and 9.5 h, respectively, for treating 10, 20, 40%, and pure actual wastewater. The removals of ammonia and TOC of goose-raising wastewater are shown in Figure 7, and the changes in ammonia and its oxidation products over time are shown in Supplementary material, Figure S6. As the actual wastewater concentration increased, the treatment effect became more obvious, accompanied by the corresponding prolongation of electrolysis time. After treatment, the actual wastewater containing 422.5 mg/L of achieved an ammonia removal rate of 87% and N2 selectivity of 77%, and TOC concentration decreased from 94.5 to 26.7 mg/L. The emission standard for poultry and livestock farming in China (GB18595-2001) stipulates that the maximum allowable daily emission concentration of in water bodies of intensive poultry farming is 80 mg/L. The concentration of the treated actual goose wastewater meets the requirements of this standard. The energy consumption for removing 87% ammonia nitrogen and 72% TOC from actual wastewater was 0.0119 kw·h. It was interpreted by the fact that the EAO system was also responsible for the removal of organic pollutants. All these results corroborated that this EAO system represented an attractive route for treating high-concentration ammonia wastewater.
Figure 7

(a) Conversion proportion of N2, , and and (b) changes in TOC in the process of electrochemical oxidation of aquaculture wastewater. (Experimental conditions: anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2).

Figure 7

(a) Conversion proportion of N2, , and and (b) changes in TOC in the process of electrochemical oxidation of aquaculture wastewater. (Experimental conditions: anode current density = 25.00 mA/cm2).

Close modal

Under chlorine free conditions, commercial Ni foam and Cu foam were used as anode and cathode, respectively, for direct EAO. Due to the coupling effect between Ni anode and Cu cathode, nitrogen cycling in the electrochemical system was promoted, thereby improving the ammonia removal rate and N2 selectivity. When the initial concentration of ammonia nitrogen was 111.12 mg/L, after 150 min of electrolysis with 250 mA of current, the removal rate of ammonia remained at 92.5%, and the N2 selectivity was 90%. Flaky Ni(OH)2 with oxygen defects generated during electrolysis was confirmed to be the EAO active site. When this electrochemical system was used to treat goose-raising wastewater containing 422.5 mg/L of , it had a significant removal effect on ammonia and TOC. After treatment, this electrochemical system achieved good performance with an ammonia removal rate of 87%, N2 selectivity of 77%, and TOC removal rate of 72%. It is worth noting that the ammonia nitrogen of the treated goose wastewater has reached the discharge standard for breeding wastewater (GB18595-2001) in China. In summary, this electrochemical system with commercial electrodes was simple to construct, and had the potential to be applied to efficiently treat high-concentration ammonia wastewater.

Y.X. contributed to funding, review, project administration and conceptualization; X.W. contributed to methodology and writing; Q.L. contributed to collection of actual wastewater and data analysis; M.F. contributed to sample testing and data analysis; Z.D. contributed to sample testing; W.Z. and J.C. contributed to data curation; N.L. and Z.L. contributed to funding and supervision.

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Suzhou University Startup Foundation for Doctor (2021BSK042), Projects of Colleges and Universities in Anhui Province (2022AH040211), the scientific research program of the Anhui Provincial Education Department (KJ2021A1105), the fourth batch of outstanding academic and technical backbones of Suzhou University (2020XJGG06); Excellent Youth Support Program in Colleges and Universities of Anhui Province (gxyq2022104).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

AlJaberi
F. Y.
,
Ahmed
S. A.
,
Makki
H. F.
,
Naje
A. S.
,
Zwain
H. M.
,
Salman
A. D.
,
Juzsakova
T.
,
Viktor
S.
,
Van
B.
,
Le
P. C.
,
La
D. D.
,
Chang
W.
,
Um
M. J.
,
Ngo
H. H.
&
Nguyen
D. D.
2023
Recent advances and applicable flexibility potential of electrochemical processes for wastewater treatment
.
Sci. Total Environ.
867
,
161361
.
Almomani
F.
,
Bhosale
R.
,
Khraisheh
M.
,
Kumar
A.
&
Tawalbeh
M.
2020
Electrochemical oxidation of ammonia on nickel oxide nanoparticles
.
Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.
45
,
10398
10408
.
Bi
B.
,
Dong
A. Q.
,
Shi
M. M.
,
Sun
X. F.
,
Li
H. R.
,
Kang
X.
,
Gao
R.
,
Meng
Z.
,
Chen
Z. Y.
,
Xu
T. W.
,
Yan
J. M.
&
Jiang
Q.
2023
Efficient ammonia synthesis from nitrate catalyzed by Au/Cu with enhanced adsorption ability
.
Small Struct.
4
,
2200308
.
Bunce
N. J.
&
Bejan
D.
2011
Mechanism of electrochemical oxidation of ammonia
.
Electrochim. Acta.
56
,
8085
8093
.
Cifcioglu-Gozuacik
B.
,
Ergenekon
S. M.
,
Ozbey-Unal
B.
,
Balcik
C.
,
Karagunduz
A.
,
Dizge
N.
&
Keskinler
B.
2021
Efficient removal of ammoniacal nitrogen from textile printing wastewater by electro-oxidation considering the effects of NaCl and NaOCl addition
.
Water. Sci. Technol.
84
(
3
),
752
762
.
Ding
J.
,
Zhao
Q. L.
,
Wei
L. L.
,
Chen
Y.
&
Shu
X.
2013
Ammonium nitrogen removal from wastewater with a three-dimensional electrochemical oxidation system
.
Water. Sci. Technol.
68
(
3
),
552
559
.
Hao
J.
,
Yan
L.
,
Zou
X.
,
Bai
Y.
,
Han
Y.
,
Zhu
C.
,
Zhou
Y.
&
Xiang
B.
2023
Series of halogen engineered Ni(OH)2 nanosheet for pseudocapacitive energy storage with high energy density
.
Small
19
,
2300467
.
He
S.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Wang
M.
,
Nuomin
H.
,
Novello
P.
,
Li
X.
,
Zhu
S.
&
Liu
J.
2021
Metal nitride nanosheets enable highly efficient electrochemical oxidation of ammonia
.
Nano Energy.
80
,
105528
.
He
S.
,
Somayaji
V.
,
Wang
M.
,
Lee
S. H.
,
Geng
Z.
,
Zhu
S.
,
Novello
P.
,
Varanasi Chakrapani
V.
&
Liu
J.
2022
High entropy spinel oxide for efficient electrochemical oxidation of ammonia
.
Nano Res
.
15
,
1
7
.
Huang
H.
,
Zheng
H.
,
Jiao
J.
,
Lei
Y.
,
Zhou
Y.
,
Qiu
J.
&
Yang
X.
2022
Trichloramine and hydroxyl radical contributions to dichloroacetonitrile formation following breakpoint chlorination
.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
56
,
12592
12601
.
Kang
Y.
,
Wang
W.
,
Li
J.
,
Li
Q.
,
Liu
S.
&
Lei
Z.
2017
A highly efficient Pt-NiO/C electrocatalyst for ammonia electro-oxidation
.
J. Electrochem. Soc.
164
,
F958
.
Kapałka
A.
,
Cally
A.
,
Neodo
S.
,
Comninellis
C.
,
Wächter
M.
&
Udert
K. M.
2010
Electrochemical behavior of ammonia at Ni/Ni(OH)2 electrode
.
Electrochemistry Communications
12
,
18
21
.
Krisbiantoro
P. A.
,
Kato
K.
,
Mahardiani
L.
&
Kamiya
Y.
2020
Oxidation of ammonia nitrogen with ozone in water: A mini review
.
J. Indones. Chem. Soc.
3
,
17
.
Kuang
W.
,
Yan
Z.
,
Chen
J.
,
Ling
X.
,
Zheng
W.
,
Huang
W.
&
Feng
C.
2022
A bipolar membrane-integrated electrochlorination process for highly efficient ammonium removal in mature landfill leachate: The importance of ClO• generation
.
Environ. Sci. Technol.
57
,
18538
18549
.
Li
J.
,
Gao
J.
,
Feng
T.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Liu
D.
,
Zhang
C.
,
Huang
S.
,
Wang
C.
,
Du
F.
,
Li
C.
&
Guo
C.
2021
Effect of supporting matrixes on performance of copper catalysts in electrochemical nitrate reduction to ammonia
.
J. Power Sources.
511
,
230463
.
Liu
N.
,
Sun
Z.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Klausen
L. H.
,
Moonhee
R.
&
Kang
S.
2023a
Emerging high-ammonia-nitrogen wastewater remediation by biological treatment and photocatalysis techniques
.
Sci. Total Environ.
875
,
162603
.
Liu
H. Y.
,
Lant
H. M.
,
Cody
C. C.
,
Jelušić
J.
,
Crabtree
R. H.
&
Brudvig
G. W.
2023b
Electrochemical ammonia oxidation with molecular catalysts
.
ACS Catal.
13
,
4675
4682
.
Pillai
H. S.
,
Li
Y.
,
Wang
S. H.
,
Omidvar
N.
,
Mu
Q.
,
Achenie
L. E.
,
Abild-Pedersen
F.
,
Yang
J.
,
Wu
G.
&
Xin
H.
2023
Interpretable design of Ir-free trimetallic electrocatalysts for ammonia oxidation with graph neural networks
.
Nat. Commun.
14
,
792
.
Song
Y.
,
Song
M.
,
Liu
P.
,
Liu
W.
,
Yuan
L.
,
Hao
X.
,
Pei
L.
,
Xu
B.
,
Guo
J.
&
Sun
Z.
2021
Fe-doping induced localized amorphization in ultrathin α-Ni(OH)2 nanomesh for superior oxygen evolution reaction catalysis
.
J. Mater. Chem. A
.
9
,
14372
14380
.
Wallace
S. W.
,
McCrum
I. T.
&
Janik
M. J.
2021
Ammonia electro-oxidation mechanism on the platinum (100) surface
.
Catal. Today.
371
,
50
57
.
Yao
J.
,
Mei
Y.
,
Xia
G.
,
Lu
Y.
,
Xu
D.
,
Sun
N.
,
Wang
J.
&
Chen
J.
2019
Process optimization of electrochemical oxidation of ammonia to nitrogen for actual dyeing wastewater treatment
.
Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He.
16
,
2931
.
Zhang
K.
,
Deng
S.
,
Zhong
Y.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Wu
J.
,
Wang
X.
,
Xia
X.
&
Tu
J.
2019
Rational construction of cross-linked porous nickel arrays for efficient oxygen evolution reaction
.
Chinese. J. Catal.
40
(
7
),
1063
1069
.
Zhang
Z.
,
Ai
H.
,
Fu
M. L.
,
Hu
Y. B.
,
Liu
J.
,
Ji
Y.
,
Vasanthakumar
V.
&
Yuan
B.
2021
A new insight into catalytic ozonation of ammonia by MgO/co3o4 composite: The effects, reaction kinetics and mechanism
.
Chem. Eng. J.
418
,
129461
.
Zhang
Y.
,
Yin
S.
,
Li
H.
,
Liu
J.
,
Li
S.
&
Zhang
L.
2022
Treatment of ammonia-nitrogen wastewater by the ultrasonic strengthened break point chlorination method
.
J. Water Process Eng.
45
,
102501
.
Zhang
H.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zhou
L.
,
Li
Q.
,
Yang
X.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhang
M.
&
Wu
Z.
2023
Efficient and highly selective direct electrochemical oxidation of ammonia to dinitrogen facilitated by NiCu diatomic site catalysts
.
Appl. Catal. B-Environ.
328
,
122544
.
Zulkifli
M.
,
Hasan
H. A.
,
Abdullah
S. R. S.
&
Muhamad
M. H.
2022
A review of ammonia removal using a biofilm-based reactor and its challenges
.
J. Environ. Manage.
315
,
115162
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data