In this study, based on the water quality characteristics of metal degreasing cleaning wastewater , wastewater treatment by coagulation combined with two-stage Fenton oxidation was proposed. The results showed that when the dosage of PAC was 5 g/L and the dosage of CPAM was 8 mg/L, with an initial pH of 8, rapid stirring at 350 rpm for 3 min followed by slow stirring at 200 rpm for 15 min, the optimal removal rate of chemical oxygen demand (COD) reached 74.08%. Primary Fenton oxidation is mainly aimed at decomposing macromolecular long-chain pollutants and removing some pollutants. The highest COD removal rate was achieved at 95.07% when the dosage of H2O2 was 4 mol/L, the dosage of FeSO4 was 40 g/L, the oxidation lasted for 60 min, the initial pH was 2, the effluent pH was 8, and the settling time was 90 min. The two-stage Fenton oxidation process provided further advanced treatment. With a reagent ratio of 1:0.5, the effluent COD concentration was reduced to 457 mg/L, meeting the third class standard of the `Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard' (GB 8978 1996).

  • Coagulation combined with two-stage Fenton oxidation was used to efficiently degrade the organic matter in the wastewater from the degreasing and cleaning of refractory metals.

  • The optimum parameters of the treatment process are defined.

  • The degradation mechanism of organic matter in high COD metal degreasing cleaning wastewater by coagulation combined with a two-stage Fenton oxidation process is expounded.

Due to the excellent physical and chemical properties of metals, they have played a crucial role in industrial development, with demand increasing annually. Before processing metals and their products, it is necessary to remove surface grease to prevent interference with subsequent processing steps. This cleaning process generates large volumes of intermittent metal degreasing wastewater, which accounts for approximately 85% of the total wastewater produced in the metal processing cycle. The annual output of this wastewater reaches 3.4 billion tons, representing 20% of the total industrial wastewater output (Zhou et al. 2014). This wastewater contains organic pollutants such as heterocyclic compounds, phenolic compounds, long-chain alkanes, and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates. Its specific composition varies based on the cleaning agents, metals, and rust inhibitors used (Abouelela et al. 2021). The chemical oxygen demand (COD) content typically exceeds 10,000 mg/L (Li et al. 2021), and it is characterized by complex components, a high concentration of refractory pollutants, and low biodegradability (5-day biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5)/COD ≤ 0.2) (Günes et al. 2019; Joseph et al. 2021), making its treatment highly challenging.

Currently, research on treatment technologies for metal degreasing cleaning wastewater is limited, but conventional techniques applicable to similar wastewater (containing surfactants that are difficult to degrade) can provide useful references. Jangkorn et al. (2011) used fresh alum and alum sludge as coagulants to treat wastewater with high organic and anionic surfactant content, achieving removal rates of approximately 92.80% for COD and 90.00% for anionic surfactants. Not only high removal rates were achieved, but the usage of fresh alum was also reduced considering the economic benefits. Joao et al. (2021) treated industrial wastewater containing detergents with a Fenton ultrasonic method using H2O2 and iron nails and achieved a detergent removal rate of 99.40%. Thus, the coagulation method is efficient and simple to operate, and it can be used on a large scale which is a promising technology for treating and reducing hazardous waste. However, its effectiveness on complex cleaning wastewater with a COD concentration above 20,000 mg/L requires further research. Advanced oxidation degrades pollutants in wastewater by generating hydroxyl radicals which are widely used in industrial wastewater pretreatment and the advanced treatment of wastewater, particularly the removal of recalcitrant organic substances (Xiaocong et al. 2023). As a form of advanced oxidation, the Fenton oxidation method is characterized by strong oxidation capacity, mild reaction conditions, a simple process, and ease of control, and it is widely applied in the treatment of recalcitrant industrial wastewater (Bobo et al. 2016; Li et al. 2018). However, a single physicochemical process often cannot directly decompose and remove large molecular pollutants from metal degreasing cleaning wastewater in practical applications; it requires pretreatment processes to alter the chemical structure of the pollutants, breaking down large molecules into smaller ones before further advanced treatment processes.

At present, there are few reports on methods for treating metal degreasing cleaning wastewater with COD concentrations exceeding 20,000 mg/L. To address this challenge, this research proposes an efficient treatment process that combines coagulation with two-stage Fenton oxidation for high COD metal degreasing wastewater. Coagulation is employed as the primary treatment, followed by two-stage Fenton oxidation to further remove residual contaminants. The effectiveness of this method was evaluated by monitoring COD removal to improve the effluent quality to meet discharge standards. This approach offers a viable technological solution for the treatment of metal degreasing wastewater in various industries.

Experimental materials

Wastewater source and quality

The metal degreasing cleaning wastewater used in this study was taken from a machinery processing enterprise in China. The wastewater was milky white, and its main water quality characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1

Wastewater quality characteristics

Water quality indexParameter
Potential of hydrogen 12–13 
Chemical oxygen demand (mg/L) 20,000–25,000 
Ammonia nitrogen (mg/L) 350–370 
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 450–490 
Water quality indexParameter
Potential of hydrogen 12–13 
Chemical oxygen demand (mg/L) 20,000–25,000 
Ammonia nitrogen (mg/L) 350–370 
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 450–490 

Experimental reagents

The reagents, drug purity, and manufacturers used in this study are shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Experimental reagents

Drug nameDrug purityManufacturer
Polyaluminium chloride (PAC) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Polyferric chloride (PFC) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Polyaluminum ferric chloride (PAFC) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Hydrogen peroxide (30% H2O2Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Ferrous sulfate (FeSO4Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
Sodium sulfite (NaSO3Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
LH-D Analytical reagent Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 
LH-E Analytical reagent Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Drug nameDrug purityManufacturer
Polyaluminium chloride (PAC) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Polyferric chloride (PFC) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Polyaluminum ferric chloride (PAFC) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM) Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Hydrogen peroxide (30% H2O2Analytical reagent Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Ferrous sulfate (FeSO4Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
Sulfuric acid (H2SO4Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
Sodium sulfite (NaSO3Analytical reagent China National Pharmaceutical Group Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd 
LH-D Analytical reagent Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 
LH-E Analytical reagent Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 

Experimental instruments

The names, models, and manufacturers of the instruments used in this study are listed in Table 3.

Table 3

Experimental instruments

Instrument nameModelManufacturer
Magnetic stirrer S25-2 Shanghai Sile Instrument Co., Ltd, China 
pH meter DZS-708L Shanghai Yidian Keyi Co., Ltd, China 
3D fluorescence spectrometer F-7000 Hitachi, Japan 
COD rapid tester 5B-3C (V8) Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Intelligent dual-temperature zone digester 5B-1B (V8) Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Instrument nameModelManufacturer
Magnetic stirrer S25-2 Shanghai Sile Instrument Co., Ltd, China 
pH meter DZS-708L Shanghai Yidian Keyi Co., Ltd, China 
3D fluorescence spectrometer F-7000 Hitachi, Japan 
COD rapid tester 5B-3C (V8) Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 
Intelligent dual-temperature zone digester 5B-1B (V8) Lianhua Technology Co., Ltd, China 

Process flow and experimental device diagram

The experimental setup and process used in this study are illustrated in Figure 1. First, a beaker was placed on a magnetic stirrer, and 100 mL of wastewater sample was added. The pH was adjusted to 8 using 2% H2SO4 while maintaining a stable stirring speed. Then, the coagulant was added and stirred for 3 min, followed by the addition of the coagulant aid cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), with stirring continued for 15 min. After the reaction, the beaker was left to settle for precipitation. Next, 50 mL of the supernatant was collected, and the pH was adjusted to 2 using 2% H2SO4. FeSO4 was weighed and added to the beaker. Once fully dissolved and mixed, H2O2 was introduced for the Fenton reaction. Finally, the effluent pH was adjusted by adding solid NaOH. After allowing the mixture to settle, the supernatant was taken for COD determination.
Figure 1

Process flow chart and experimental device diagram. (a) Process flow chart. (b) Experimental device diagram.

Figure 1

Process flow chart and experimental device diagram. (a) Process flow chart. (b) Experimental device diagram.

Close modal

Analytical methods

Water samples were collected for analysis at the end of each reaction. The determination of COD was conducted according to HJ/T 399-2007 ‘Water Quality Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand Fast Digestion-Spectrophotometric Method’ (People's Republic of China (PRC) Environmental Protection Bureau 2008). Prior to the determination of dissolved organic matter (DOM), water samples were pretreated with a filter membrane and then diluted to ensure that UV254 was less than 0.1. Subsequently, a three-dimensional fluorescence spectrometer was used for characterization (Xi et al. 2021).

Study on the effectiveness of coagulation treatment

Effects of the types and dosage of chemicals on COD removal

In this study, CPAM was selected as the coagulant aid, while polyferric chloride (PFC), polyaluminium chloride (PAC), and polyaluminum ferric chloride (PAFC) were used as coagulants to assess the COD removal efficiency. The coagulant aid was dosed at 8 mg/L with an initial pH of 8. The wastewater underwent rapid mixing at 350 rpm for 3 min, followed by slow mixing at 200 rpm for 15 min. To examine the effects of different coagulants and dosages on COD removal, varying concentrations of PFC, PAC, and PAFC (2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 g/L) were added to the wastewater. The results are presented in Figure 2(a). With a coagulant (PAC) dosage of 5 g/L under consistent mixing conditions and an initial pH, different dosages of CPAM – 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/L – were added to the wastewater to investigate the effect of varying coagulant aid concentrations on COD removal efficiency, as shown in Figure 2(b).
Figure 2

(a) Effect of coagulant dosage on COD removal; (b) effect of coagulant aid dosage on COD removal.

Figure 2

(a) Effect of coagulant dosage on COD removal; (b) effect of coagulant aid dosage on COD removal.

Close modal

As the dosage of coagulants increased, the COD removal rate initially rose, reaching a peak at a dosage of 5 g/L, before declining. This pattern can be explained by the fact that increasing the coagulant dosage enhances interactions between oppositely charged particles in the wastewater, facilitating the formation of a double layer (comprising an adsorption layer and a diffusion layer) during coagulation, which reduces the repulsive forces between colloids (Wang et al. 2021). Additionally, the metal salts in the coagulants form hydroxides in the wastewater, which exhibit a strong capacity to adsorb and capture pollutants, promoting the formation of flocs. However, when the dosage becomes excessive, the surface charge of the colloids may change, increasing repulsive forces between particles, hindering floc formation, and ultimately reducing pollutant removal efficiency.

In the treatment of metal degreasing wastewater, charge neutralization plays a critical role in disrupting the water–oil interface and promoting floc aggregation, making it essential to the coagulation process (Lin et al. 2023). However, the charge neutralization effect of PFC is relatively weak and not its primary mechanism of action, which may explain its lower effectiveness in treating metal degreasing wastewater (Wei et al. 2009). In contrast, PAC produces highly stable, positively charged Al13 and Al30 species during the reaction process, which exhibit stronger charge neutralization and adsorption capacities, especially under alkaline conditions, allowing for more effective removal of complex organic substances (Libing et al. 2020). The lower content of Al13 and Al30 in PAFC compared to PAC may account for PAFC's relatively lower efficiency.

As the dosage of coagulant aid increased, the COD removal rate initially rose, peaking at 8 mg/L of CPAM, before declining. CPAM, a linear high-molecular organic compound with high charge density and multiple functional groups, enhances pollutant removal by promoting the adhesion of more colloidal particles through charge neutralization and adsorption-bridging mechanisms (Zhao et al. 2018). However, when the dosage becomes excessive, too many dissociated cationic groups from the flocculant adsorb onto the surface of colloidal particles, leading to a decline in pollutant removal efficiency. This decline occurs for two reasons: first, the altered surface charge of the colloidal particles weakens the charge neutralization effect; second, an excess of cationic groups can hinder the formation of larger flocs, thereby reducing removal efficiency (Fang et al. 2023). Furthermore, since CPAM itself is a high-molecular organic compound that is difficult to degrade, an excessive amount may not fully interact with pollutants and could dissolve directly into the wastewater. This not only increases the COD load but may also complicate subsequent wastewater treatment processes.

Effect of initial pH on COD removal

The pH primarily affects the hydrolysis state of PAC in solution, which in turn influences the pollutant removal efficiency in wastewater. With a coagulant dosage of 5 g/L and a coagulant aid dosage of 8 mg/L, the wastewater was subjected to rapid stirring at 350 rpm for 3 min, followed by slow stirring at 200 rpm for 15 min. The initial pH of the wastewater was adjusted to 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 to investigate the effect of varying pH levels on COD removal efficiency. The results of this investigation are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Effect of initial pH on COD removal.

Figure 3

Effect of initial pH on COD removal.

Close modal

As the pH increased, the COD removal rate from the wastewater initially rose and then declined, reaching its highest efficiency at a pH of 8. This variation is due to the different hydrolysis products and mechanisms of aluminum salts under varying pH conditions (Song et al. 2021). In acidic conditions, aluminum salts primarily form complex ions like Al(OH)2+, which operate mainly through charge neutralization. At a pH of 7–8, aluminum salts hydrolyze to form , which exhibits strong charge neutralization and sweep-flocculation capabilities. When the pH exceeds 8, aluminum salts primarily hydrolyze to Al(OH)4−, which also acts through charge neutralization and sweep-flocculation. However, formed at a pH of 7–8 carries a higher positive charge than Al(OH)4−, resulting in stronger charge neutralization. This enhanced neutralization more effectively counters the negatively charged pollutants in the wastewater, facilitating the formation of larger flocs and improving pollutant removal efficiency.

Effect of stirring speed and stirring time on COD removal

The coagulation process consists of two primary stages: mixing and flocculation. Rapid stirring mainly influences the mixing phase, while slow stirring plays a crucial role in the flocculation phase. By controlling the speed and duration of rapid stirring, chemicals can be uniformly dispersed throughout the wastewater, promoting effective collisions between colloidal particles. With a coagulant dosage of 5 g/L, coagulant aid dosage of 8 mg/L, and an initial pH of 8, slow stirring at 200 rpm for 15 min was followed by rapid stirring at speeds of 300, 350, 400, 450, and 500 rpm for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 min, respectively. The results of these tests are shown in Figure 4(a) and 4(b). Additionally, under the same dosages and initial pH, slow stirring at 350 rpm for 3 min was conducted, followed by rapid stirring at speeds of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 rpm for 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 min, respectively. The outcomes of these experiments are displayed in Figure 4(c) and 4(d).
Figure 4

Effect of rapid stirring on COD removal: (a) rapid stirring time; (b) rapid stirring speed. Effect of slow stirring on COD removal: (c) slow stirring time; (d) slow stirring speed.

Figure 4

Effect of rapid stirring on COD removal: (a) rapid stirring time; (b) rapid stirring speed. Effect of slow stirring on COD removal: (c) slow stirring time; (d) slow stirring speed.

Close modal

Figure 4(a) demonstrates that the COD removal rate in wastewater initially increases and then decreases as the rapid stirring time is extended, reaching its peak at 3 min. At the same stirring speed, increasing the stirring time promotes more frequent collisions between colloidal particles, encouraging the formation of compact, shear-resistant flocs, which improves pollutant removal efficiency. However, floc growth is limited, and excessive rapid stirring can compromise their structure, making them looser and leading to the formation of smaller aggregates. This, in turn, negatively impacts pollutant removal performance (Nti et al. 2021).

Figure 4(b) shows that the COD removal rate from wastewater initially increases and then decreases as the rapid stirring speed rises, with the highest removal rate occurring at 350 rpm. Increased stirring speed enhances the uniform mixing of wastewater and coagulant, facilitating coagulant hydrolysis, promoting colloidal particle destabilization and adsorption, and increasing the likelihood of particle collisions. However, when the stirring speed becomes too high, the flocs are exposed to excessive shear forces, which hinder the formation of larger flocs and reduce pollutant removal efficiency.

Figure 4(c) illustrates that the COD removal rate from wastewater initially increases and then decreases as the slow stirring duration is extended, with the optimal removal rate occurring at 15 min. Prolonging the slow stirring phase enhances the ability of the flocculants to adsorb and bridge smaller floc particles, promoting aggregation and improving pollutant removal. However, excessive stirring can destabilize the floc structure, diminishing its effectiveness in removing pollutants.

Figure 4(d) shows that the COD removal rate in wastewater initially increases and then decreases as the slow stirring speed rises, with the highest removal efficiency achieved at 200 rpm. Increasing the slow stirring speed promotes effective collisions between colloidal particles, enhancing the adhesive action of coagulant aid molecules on the flocs, which improves their compactness and settling properties. However, if the stirring speed becomes too high, it can disrupt the adsorption and bridging function of the coagulant aid, weakening its ability to adhere to the flocs and thus reducing pollutant removal efficiency (Liu et al. 2021).

In summary, the optimal conditions for COD removal from metal degreasing wastewater include the addition of 5 g/L PAC and 8 mg/L CPAM. The wastewater should undergo rapid stirring at 350 rpm for 3 min, followed by slow stirring at 200 rpm for 15 min, with an initial pH of 8. Under these conditions, the maximum COD removal efficiency achieved is 74.08%.

Research on the deep treatment effect of the two-stage Fenton oxidation method

Study on the effect of first-level Fenton oxidation treatment

Effect of H2O2 and FeSO4 dosages on COD removal
When FeSO4 is added at a dosage of 40 g/L, with an initial pH of 2, an effluent pH of 8, an oxidation time of 60 min, and a settling time of 90 min, H2O2 is further dosed at varying concentrations of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mol/L. Conversely, when hydrogen peroxide is dosed at 4 mol/L under the same pH conditions and oxidation/settling durations, ferrous sulfate is added at different dosages of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 g/L. The results of these experiments are shown in Figure 5(a) and 5(b).
Figure 5

(a) Effect of H2O2 dosage on COD removal; (b) effect of FeSO4 dosage on COD removal.

Figure 5

(a) Effect of H2O2 dosage on COD removal; (b) effect of FeSO4 dosage on COD removal.

Close modal

As the dosage of H2O2 increases, the COD removal rate from wastewater initially rises and then declines, peaking at a dosage of 4 mol/L. The increased H2O2 provides more hydroxyl radicals (·OH), which primarily oxidize the pollutants, enhancing their removal. However, when excessive H2O2 is added, it undergoes side reactions with the hydroxyl radicals, leading to the depletion of these radicals and, consequently, a reduction in COD removal efficiency (Cheng et al. 2021).

As the dosage of FeSO4 increased, the COD removal rate in the wastewater initially rose and then declined. The highest COD removal rate was achieved at a dosage of 40 g/L. The increase in FeSO4 dosage raises the concentration of Fe2+ in the solution, which continuously catalyzes H2O2 to produce hydroxyl radicals (·OH), effectively enhancing the degradation of pollutants. However, when the FeSO4 dosage is too high, the excess Fe2+ promotes the rapid generation of a large number of hydroxyl radicals in a short time, leading to side reactions between H2O2 and ·OH, thereby reducing the pollutant removal efficiency of the hydroxyl radicals.

Effect of pH on COD removal
When H2O2 was dosed at 4 mol/L and FeSO4 at 40 g/L, with the effluent pH adjusted to 8, an oxidation time of 60 min, and a settling time of 90 min, the initial pH levels were varied at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Additionally, under the same H2O2 and FeSO4 dosages, with an initial pH of 2, the effluent pH was adjusted to 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 at the end of the treatment process. The results of these experiments are shown in Figure 6(a) and 6(b).
Figure 6

(a) Effect of initial pH on COD removal; (b) effect of effluent pH on COD removal.

Figure 6

(a) Effect of initial pH on COD removal; (b) effect of effluent pH on COD removal.

Close modal

As the initial pH increased, the COD removal rate from the wastewater initially rose and then declined, with the highest removal rate observed at an initial pH of 2. At this point, 5.05 mL of 2% H2SO4 was required to adjust the pH. The initial pH was found to influence both the decomposition rate of H2O2 and the state of iron in the solution. Under low pH conditions, the formation of hydroxyl radicals (·OH) occurs at a faster rate (Yildiz et al. 2023). However, as the pH increases, more H2O2 decomposes into water, reducing its effectiveness in degrading pollutants. At low pH levels, FeSO4 exists as Fe2+; as the pH rises, Fe2+ gradually converts to Fe(OH)2, lowering the efficiency of pollutant degradation.

As the effluent pH increased, the COD removal rate from the wastewater remained relatively constant, with the residual COD concentration stabilizing between 1,130 and 1,200 mg/L. The rise in pH facilitated the precipitation and flocculation of Fe2+ and Fe3+, contributing to further pollutant removal from the wastewater. In this study, adjusting the effluent pH to 8 or 9 resulted in nearly identical COD removal rates and residual concentrations. Considering economic factors, a pH of 8 was selected, requiring 2.06 g of NaOH for pH adjustment.

Effect of oxidation time and precipitation time on COD removal
When H2O2 was dosed at 4 mol/L and FeSO4 at 40 g/L, with an initial pH of 2 and an effluent pH of 8, the oxidation time was varied at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min. Similarly, using the same concentrations of H2O2 and FeSO4, and maintaining the same initial and effluent pH, the settling times were controlled at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 min with a fixed oxidation time of 60 min. The results of these variations are shown in Figure 7(a) and 7(b).
Figure 7

(a) Effect of oxidation time on COD removal; (b) effect of settling time on COD removal.

Figure 7

(a) Effect of oxidation time on COD removal; (b) effect of settling time on COD removal.

Close modal

As the oxidation time increased, the COD removal rate from the wastewater initially rose before stabilizing, reaching its peak at 60 min. The Fenton oxidation process involves a series of chain reactions, and extending the oxidation time allows these reactions to progress more fully. Additionally, metal degreasing wastewater contains a significant amount of high-molecular-weight pollutants that are difficult to degrade and require sufficient time for decomposition and oxidation. Increasing the oxidation time ensures more thorough degradation of these pollutants. However, once the reaction between H2O2 and Fe2+ approaches completion, further increases in oxidation time do not significantly improve the COD removal rate, leading to its stabilization.

As the settling time increased, the COD removal rate in the wastewater initially rose before stabilizing, reaching maximum efficiency at 90 min. At this point, Fe(OH)2, Fe(OH)3, and other suspended particles had largely settled. Extending the settling time beyond 90 min did not result in any significant improvement in treatment efficiency.

In summary, the optimal COD removal performance was achieved with a dosage of 4 mol/L H2O2, 40 g/L FeSO4, an oxidation time of 60 min, an initial pH of 2, an effluent pH of 8, and a settling time of 90 min. Under these conditions, the COD removal rate reached 95.07%. However, the effluent COD concentration remained at 1,040 mg/L, indicating that additional treatment would be required.

Study on the effect of secondary Fenton oxidation treatment

After applying primary Fenton oxidation for the deep treatment of metal degreasing wastewater, it was observed that the effluent COD concentration remained elevated. As a result, additional stages of Fenton reagent treatment were considered to further reduce the COD levels in the effluent. Building on the optimal parameters of the primary Fenton oxidation, a secondary Fenton oxidation experiment was conducted, varying only the overall reagent dosage ratios to examine their impact on COD removal efficiency. The results, shown in Figure 8, indicate that the COD removal rate gradually increased with higher reagent dosage ratios. However, there was no significant improvement in treatment effect when increasing the ratio from 1:1 to 1:2. Furthermore, using a reagent dosage ratio of 1:0.5 achieved an effluent COD concentration of 457 mg/L, which met the third-class standard of the ‘Integrated Wastewater Discharge Standard’ (GB 8978–1996). Therefore, considering both economic efficiency and environmental protection, a reagent dosage ratio of 1:0.5 was selected for the secondary Fenton oxidation process.
Figure 8

Effect of different additive ratios on COD removal.

Figure 8

Effect of different additive ratios on COD removal.

Close modal

Analysis of fluorescence characteristics of coagulation–two-stage Fenton oxidation effluent

As previously mentioned, the combined use of coagulation and two-stage Fenton oxidation has proven effective in removing COD from metal degreasing wastewater. However, further analysis is necessary to evaluate the removal efficiency of different organic compounds. This can be achieved using excitation–emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy to analyze the fluorescent components of the wastewater pollutants (Zhu et al. 2022).

As shown in Figure 9(a)–9(d), the fluorescence components of the four water samples are concentrated in regions I, II, and IV, primarily consisting of aromatic proteins or phenolic substances (Ex < 250 nm, Em < 380 nm) and dissolved microbial metabolites (Ex > 250 nm, Em < 380 nm) (Yang et al. 2023). After coagulation treatment, the intensity of the fluorescence peaks in different areas of the effluent increased, while the types of fluorescent components remained largely unchanged. This may be due to the formation of small, soluble, and hydrophilic pollutants during coagulation, as coagulants are more effective at removing larger, hydrophobic pollutants from the wastewater. As a result, the concentration of fluorescent components in the wastewater increases (Chu et al. 2020; Zhang et al. 2023), aligning with the coagulation mechanism. Following the two-stage Fenton oxidation treatment, the fluorescence peak intensity in all regions gradually decreased, with a small amount of fulvic acid, protein, and humic acid (Em > 400 nm) emerging. This indicates that the two-stage Fenton oxidation process effectively degrades pollutants such as DOM and aromatic proteins in the wastewater, which is consistent with the observed COD removal results.
Figure 9

EEM diagram of coagulation-multistage Fenton oxidation effluent: (a) raw water; (b) coagulated effluent; (c) primary Fenton oxidation effluent; (d) two-stage Fenton oxidized effluent.

Figure 9

EEM diagram of coagulation-multistage Fenton oxidation effluent: (a) raw water; (b) coagulated effluent; (c) primary Fenton oxidation effluent; (d) two-stage Fenton oxidized effluent.

Close modal

The experimental results indicate that the optimal conditions for treating metal cleaning wastewater through coagulation are as follows: the addition of 5 g/L PAC and 8 mg/L CPAM, with an initial pH of 8. The process involves rapid stirring at 350 rpm for 3 min, followed by slow stirring at 200 rpm for 15 min. For primary Fenton oxidation, the best conditions are the addition of 4 mol/L H2O2 and 40 g/L FeSO4, with an oxidation duration of 60 min, an initial pH of 2, an effluent pH of 8, and a settling time of 90 min. The optimal reagent ratio for secondary Fenton oxidation is 1:0.5. Using coagulation as a pretreatment step effectively reduces the high concentrations of pollutants in metal degreasing wastewater, which primarily consists of negatively charged anionic surfactants and oils. Coagulation works by hydrolyzing PAC and CPAM in the wastewater, producing cationic groups that neutralize charges, destabilize colloids, and remove pollutants through entrapment and adsorption, achieving a COD removal rate of 74.08%. However, coagulation is less effective in removing aromatic proteins and small-molecular-weight hydrophilic dissolved pollutants. The multistage Fenton oxidation process addresses this limitation by efficiently degrading aromatic proteins and dissolved organic pollutants.

This research is supported by Jilin Science and Technology Development Plan (20230303007SF).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Cheng, F., Zhou, P., Liu, Y., Huo, X., Zhang, J., Yuan, Y., Zhang, H., Lai, B. & Zhang, Y.
(
2021
)
Graphene oxide mediated Fe(III) reduction for enhancing Fe(III)/H2O2 Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation toward chloramphenicol degradation
,
Science of the Total Environment
,
797
, 149097.
Chu
D. Y.
,
Ye
Z. L.
&
Chen
S. H.
(
2020
)
Interactions among low-molecular-weight organics, heavy metals, and Fe(III) during coagulation of landfill leachate nanofiltration concentrate
,
Waste Management
, 104, 51–59.
Fang, H., Yang, S., Zhao, J., Li, W. & Yu, J.
(
2023
)
Characteristics of magnetic coagulation for pollutants removal from black and odorous water
,
China Water & Wastewater
,
39
(
15
),
70
74
.
Jangkorn, S., Kuhakaew, S., Theantanoo, S., Klinla-or, H. & Sriwiriyarat, T.
(
2011
)
Evaluation of reusing alum sludge for the coagulation of industrial wastewater containing mixed anionic surfactants
,
Journal of Environmental Sciences
,
23
(
4
),
587
594
.
Joao, J. J., Silva, C. S., Vieira, J. L., Wensing, C. S. & Locks, M. S.
(
2021
)
Effluent treatment: Detergent removal using Fenton ultrasound process and reused nail
,
Engenharia Sanitaria E Ambiental
,
26
(
6
),
1051
1058
.
Joseph, C. G., Farm, Y. Y., Taufiq-Yap, Y. H., Pang, C. K., Nga Janice, L. H. & Li, P. G.
(
2021
)
Ozonation treatment processes for the remediation of detergent wastewater: A comprehensive review
,
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
,
9
(
5
), 106099.
Li, C., Huang, K.,Fu, Y., Wang, W., Wang, L. & Feng, L.
(
2021
)
Iron-carbon microelectrolysis-Fenton combined photocatalysis treatment of metal processing cleaning wastewater
,
Technology of Water Treatment
,
47
(
10
),
66
70 + 74
.
Lin, Z., Zhang, C., Sun, C., Sun, C., Lu, W., Quan, B., Su, P., Li, X., Zhang, T., Guo, J. & Li, W.
(
2023
)
Treatment of high turbidity mine drainage with iron-based hybrid flocculants: Synthesis process and mechanism, and its interfacial flocculation mechanism
,
Separation and Purification Technology
,
327
, 124870.
Liu, L., Wang, X., Yang, C., An, G. & Wang, D.
(
2020
)
Dominant morphology analysis and coagulation characteristics of aluminum coagulants
,
Journal of Environmental Science
,
40
(
12
),
4249
4262
.
Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, D., Zeng, X. & Zhao, Y.
(
2021
)
Simulation experiment of microplastics removal from domestic wastewater by flocculation
,
Applied Chemical Industry
,
50
(
7
),
1789
1794
.
Niu, B., Mai, W., Li, H., Tang, Q. & Dang, W
. (
2016
)
Advanced treatment of tannery wastewater by Fenton fluidized bed
,
Industrial Water Treatment
,
36
(
11
),
34
38
.
Nti
S. O.
,
Buamah
R.
&
Atebiya
J.
(
2021
)
Polyaluminium chloride dosing effects on coagulation performance: Case study, Barekese, Ghana
,
Water Practice and Technology
,
16
(
4
),
1215
1223
.
People's Republic of China (PRC) Environmental Protection Bureau
. (
2008
)
HJ/T399–2007 Determination of Chemical Oxygen Demand in Water Quality [S] Rapid Digestion Spectrophotometry
. .
Beijing
:
China Environmental Science Press
.
Song, W., Xie, Y., Hu, J., Wu, X. & Li, X.
(
2021
)
Parametric optimization of cyanobacterial coagulation at exponential and decline phases by combining polyaluminum chloride and cationic polyacrylamide
,
Aqua-Water Infrastructure Ecosystems and Society
,
70
(
3
),
317
327
.
Tian, X., Li, X., Ren, Z., Ji, X., Lv, Y., Yang, L. & Bian, D.
(
2021
)
Spectral characteristics of dissolved organic matter in low temperature sewage treated by micro-pressure inner-loop bioreactor
,
Environmental Science & Technology
,
44
(
6
),
67
73
.
Wei, J., Gao, B., Yue, Q., Wang, Y. & Lu, L.
(
2009
)
Performance and mechanism of polyferric-quaternary ammonium salt composite flocculants in treating high organic matter and high alkalinity surface water
,
Journal of Hazardous Materials
,
165
(
1–3
),
789
795
.
Wang, P., Ding, S., An, G., Qu, R., Liu, X., Fang. C. & Chu, W.
(
2021
)
Removal of disinfection by-product precursors by Al-based coagulants: A comparative study on coagulation performance
,
Journal of Hazardous Materials
,
420
, 126558.
Wang, X., Ji, D., Cai, Q. & Yan, Z.
(
2023
)
Coagulation sedimentation-Fenton fluidized bed process for industrial park wastewater treatment
,
Chemical Engineering and Equipment
,
07
,
253
255
.
Yang, Y., Wang, X., Wu, S., Yao, X., Feng, L., Feng, X. & Ma, Y.
(
2023
)
Insight into the application of micro-nano bubbles combined with heat-activated persulfate oxidation for removing dissolved organic matter from printing and dying wastewater
,
Journal of Water Process Engineering
,
56
, 104463.
Yildiz
S.
,
Sentürk
I.
&
Canbaz
G. T.
(
2023
)
Degradation of phenol and 4-chlorophenolfrom aqueous solution by Fenton, photo-Fenton, sono-Fenton, and sono-photo-Fenton methods
,
Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society
,
20
(
1
),
231
237
.
Zhang, L., Liu, X., Zhang, M., Wang, T., Yang, H. & Jia, Y.
(
2023
)
The effect of pH/PAC on the coagulation of anionic surfactant wastewater generated in the cosmetic production
,
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
,
11
(
2
), 109312.
Zheng, L., Wang, X., Zheng, X. & Hu, S.
(
2018
)
Anaerobic/aerobic/Fenton fluidized bed process for treating non-paper-making wastewater
,
China Water Supply and Drainage
,
34
(
24
),
70
74
.
Zhao, C., Zheng, H., Gao, B., Liu, Y., Zhai, J., Zhang, S. & Xu, B.
(
2018
)
Ultrasound-initiated synthesis of cationic polyacrylamide for oily wastewater treatment: Enhanced interaction between the flocculant and contaminants
,
Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
,
42
(
31–41
).
Zhou, D., Sun, M., Wang, J. & Xi, X.
(
2014
)
Research of treatment technology for electroplating wastewater
,
Applied Mechanics and Materials
,
487
,
713
716
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).