Dark fermentation has the potential to produce biohydrogen using raw material waste, such as wastewater from the corn industry (cornWW), which is characteristically alkaline and improperly discharged. This study aimed to assess the impact of different hydraulic retention times (HRT) on hydrogen production in a sequencing batch reactor system using raw cornWW as feedstock. Different HRTs were evaluated (4, 2, and 1 day(s)). Higher biohydrogen productivity was observed in HRT value of 1 day (893.6 ± 10.1 NmL H2/Lreactor/day), indicating its favorable metabolic pathways leading to the generation of hydrogen, carbon dioxide, acetate, butyrate, and caproate. Microbial analysis revealed that the Atopobium and Clostridium (genera) played key roles in hydrogen and organic acid production. Additionally, during the fermentation of cornWW, lactic acid in the feedstock facilitated the production of caproic and propionic acids, further enriching the range of valuable byproducts obtained through this process.

  • Biohydrogen production from corn industry wastewater achieved high yields even without rigorous pH control.

  • Atopobium and Clostridium genera played key roles in H2 and volatile fatty acids production.

  • The dark fermentation of corn industry wastewater resulted in a diversity of biochemical byproducts.

COD

chemical oxygen demand

cornWW

corn industrial wastewater

DF

dark fermentation

H2

hydrogen

HRT

hydraulic retention time

OLR

organic loading rate

SBR

sequencing batch reactor

TS

total solids

MCFA

medium chain fatty acids

VFA

volatile fatty acids

VS

volatile solids

The inadequate treatment of industrial wastewater has caused social, environmental, and economic problems. Wastewater is a potential solution for creating value-added products, using it as a raw material instead of being seen as a problem. It could reduce freshwater consumption (UNESCO 2023) and promote the energy transition to reduce fossil fuel use. Dark fermentation (DF), an anaerobic biological treatment, is suitable for achieving a circular economy using a biorefinery approach (Ahmad et al. 2024). This approach involves converting solid or liquid carbohydrate-rich wastes into value-added byproducts, including hydrogen (H2) and organic fatty acids (Regueira-Marcos et al. 2023).

The maize processing industry is one of the most common food industries worldwide concerning the production of fructose, glucose, starch, dextrose, food oil, corn flour, gluten, and sorbitol, as well as animal food production and biofuels (Beszedes et al. 2009). The DF process can effectively utilize corn industrial wastewater (cornWW), such as effluent from corn food processing, corn starch, flour production, and tortillas (Vázquez-López & Moreno Andrade 2024). Wastewater from the maize processing industry is rich in proteins, amino acids, carbohydrates, and nitrogenous compounds (Ewida 2020). This type of wastewater is characterized by its substantial organic matter content ranging between 13.6 and 52.8 gCOD/L, and alkalinity ranging from 0.2 to 3.3 gCaCO3/L with a pH range of 10–14 (España-Gamboa et al. 2017; García-Depraect et al. 2017; Del Angel-Acosta et al. 2021; Valderrama-Bravo et al. 2022). The cornWW has relatively good biodegradability (DBO5/DQO = 0.4) compared to the optimal value of 0.5 (Vázquez-López et al. 2023).

In Mexico, 14.4 million m3/year of cornWW is discharged into sewers and water bodies without treatment, causing various problems (Valero et al. 2018). CornWW stands out for its abundant availability, biodegradability, and energy potential derived from anaerobic biological processes. For example, cornWW is recognized as one of Mexico's top 20 priority substrates for biogas production, positioning it as a critical feedstock within the biorefinery concept (Harder et al. 2020; Kang et al. 2020).

Previous studies have indicated the possibility of producing value-added compounds and energy carriers from cornWW, such as H2, through the DF process, although there is limited information available (García-Depraect et al. 2017, 2019; Buitimea-Cantúa et al. 2020; Del Angel-Acosta et al. 2021; Campos-Flores et al. 2023; Vázquez-López & Moreno Andrade 2024). H2 is gaining recognition as a promising clean energy source. The DF process is one of the most innovative methods for producing H2, offering a sustainable way to generate this fuel. Additionally, it contributes to organic waste management, reduces pollution, and supports a circular economy. As a result, this method represents a promising solution for the future of renewable energy (Ahmad et al. 2024).

The use of a discontinuous sequencing batch reactor (SBR) may be appropriate for processing this kind of wastewater since it has been observed that SBR can generate high H2 production since they allow independent control of solid retention time and hydraulic condition time (Seengenyoung et al. 2019). However, it is essential to investigate operating conditions that can enhance H2 production and other metabolites. Hydraulic retention time (HRT) is a key parameter in DF that influences H2 production, microbial activity, stability, and overall process efficiency (Ghimire et al. 2015; Alvarez et al. 2022). The selection of the most suitable HRT is affected by the complexity of organic molecules, i.e. complex substrates necessitate a longer HRT to ensure sufficient time for their decomposition. However, it is important to consider that an appropriate HRT ensures ample H2 yields (David et al. 2019). This investigation aimed to assess HRT's impact on H2 production in an SBR system, using raw cornWW as feedstock.

Feedstock and inoculum

CornWW was obtained from a tortilla-producing plant in Querétaro, Mexico. The samples were stored in plastic containers at 4 °C. The inoculum was obtained from a mesophilic anaerobic digester that treated wastewater generated by the flour industry and thermally pretreated at 105 ± 5 °C for 24 h to eliminate methanogenic archaea and H2-consuming bacteria (homoacetogenic) and selecting spore-forming bacteria (Muñoz-Páez et al. 2019). After the heat pretreatment, the particle size was reduced to 210 μm using a coffee grinder HB80393 (Hamilton Beach, USA). Table 1 shows the characterization of the inoculum and cornWW.

Table 1

Characterization of pretreated inoculum and cornWW

ParameterInoculumcornWW
pH 12.07 ± 0.018 
Density 1,012.91 ± 0.452 g/L 
Moisture 4.86 ± 0.05% 97.63 ± 0.011% 
Total solid 951.39 ± 0.48 g/kg 23.71 ± 0.107 g/L 
Volatile solid 759.52 ± 0.60 g/kg 17.26 ± 0.136 g/L 
VS/TS ratio 0.798 0.728 
COD 25.45 ± 0.035 gO2/L 
Carbohydrates 12.9 ± 0.1 g/L 
Proteins 8.75 ± 0.2 g/L 
Lipids 0.06 ± 0.1 g/L 
ParameterInoculumcornWW
pH 12.07 ± 0.018 
Density 1,012.91 ± 0.452 g/L 
Moisture 4.86 ± 0.05% 97.63 ± 0.011% 
Total solid 951.39 ± 0.48 g/kg 23.71 ± 0.107 g/L 
Volatile solid 759.52 ± 0.60 g/kg 17.26 ± 0.136 g/L 
VS/TS ratio 0.798 0.728 
COD 25.45 ± 0.035 gO2/L 
Carbohydrates 12.9 ± 0.1 g/L 
Proteins 8.75 ± 0.2 g/L 
Lipids 0.06 ± 0.1 g/L 

Reactor operation

A fermentative SBR made of acrylic material, with a total volume of 1.5 L, a headspace of 0.3 L, and an exchange volume of 50%, was utilized as the experimental unit (Figure 1). The reactor was equipped with feed and discharge pumps. Raw cornWW was fed into the SBR reactor with a substrate/inoculum ratio of 2.7 (Carrillo-Reyes et al. 2019). Biogas volume was measured using an online μFlow digital biogas meter (BPC Instruments TM, Lund, Sweden). Sample ports were used for sampling biogas and liquid phases.
Figure 1

SBR set-up.

Experiments were performed at 37 ± 1 °C with agitation at 120 rpm using a magnetic stirrer plate. At the beginning of each cycle, the pH was adjusted to 7.5 with HCl (5N) according to the standardized biohydrogen potential protocol described by Carrillo-Reyes et al. (2019). No buffer solution was added during the reactor operation. The SBR was operated using the following strategy: filling time 5 min, reaction time (47, 23, and 11 h) according to the evaluated HRT (4, 2, and 1 day(s), respectively), settling time (50 min), and draw time (5 min). A total of 20 operational cycles were evaluated, and the organic loading rate (OLR) was calculated by Inoue et al. (2014). The biogas (CH4, CO2, and H2) composition was analyzed using an SRI 8610C gas chromatograph (SRI instrumental, USA) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector and a 30-m-long (0.53 mm ID) Carboxen-1010 PLOT column. The operating conditions for the chromatograph were as follows: nitrogen was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 4.5 mL/min. The injector temperature was set to 200 °C, the column temperature to 100 °C, and the detector temperature was fixed at 230 °C (according to Salazar-Batres & Moreno Andrade 2022). A sample volume of 5 mL was utilized for analysis. The percentage of H2 in biogas was considered to calculate the total H2 volume measurement.

Net production of medium chain/volatile fatty acids (MCFAs/VFAs) during DF was calculated with the following equation:
(1)
where NP is the net production (g/L), IC is the initial concentration of MCFAs/VFAs in the mixture of the substrate feed and the remaining volume in the reactor (g/L), and the FC is the final concentration of MCFAs/VFAs in the effluent (g/L).

The effect of HRT was evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a 95% confidence interval to identify significant differences (p < 0.05), and Tukey pairwise comparison was made to detect significant differences among individual conditions in Minitab 17.

Analytical methods and microbial analysis

pH was measured using a digital pH meter (Hanna, Hi5522). The carbohydrate, protein, and lipid content were determined according to the methods described by Dubois et al. (1956), Lowry et al. (1951), and Mishra et al. (2014), respectively. VFAs were quantified by HPLC, according to González-Tenorio et al. (2020). Total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were determined according to standard methods (APHA 2005).

Five samples were analyzed to identify the microorganisms in the inoculum, raw corn wastewater (substrate), and at the end of three different HRT periods (cycles 7, 13, and 20). The microbial community was identified under the same reactor operating conditions, except for the variations in HRT. The collected samples were concentrated by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 4 min and then stored at −20 °C until analysis. Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted from biomass samples using the PowerSoil® DNA isolation kit (MOBIO, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The DNA concentration was quantified by spectrophotometry using a NANODrop 2000c (Thermo Scientific, USA). The DNA was submitted to the Integrated Microbiome Resource for Illumina MiSeq sequencing. Universal primers for bacteria and archaea (515 FB: GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA and 806RB: GGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT) targeting the V4 variable region of the 16S rDNA were utilized. The sequence analysis pipeline was made following the methodology outlined by Zavala-Méndez et al. (2022).

Production of hydrogen at different HRT without pH control

During the 20 operational cycles of the reactor, a consistent presence of H2 was observed. Based on the data, an average productivity of approximately 154.9 ± 35.7 H2/Lreactor/day can be attained with an HRT of 4 days. However, reducing the HRT to 2 and 1 day(s) results in a significant increase in productivity to 452.0 ± 57.7 and 893.6 ± 0.1 NmL H2/Lreactor/day, respectively, (p < 0.05) (Figure 2). The most significant peak in H2 productivity occurred during the transition from cycle 13 to cycle 14, when the HRT was reduced from 2 to 1 day(s). This increase in productivity is likely attributed to starting with a longer HRT and a low OLR, which allowed for the gradual acclimation of microorganisms to the feedstock and the establishment of stability. This operational condition fostered the development of a robust and diverse microbial population capable of better-managing fluctuations in organic loading in subsequent stages.
Figure 2

Productivity of hydrogen in the DF process.

Figure 2

Productivity of hydrogen in the DF process.

Close modal

Previous research has demonstrated the estimated productivity of using cornWW as a feedstock in the DF process without pH control. Del Angel-Acosta et al. (2021) achieved productivity of 178.8 mL H2/Lreactor/day, and Vázquez-López & Moreno-Andrade (2024) reached 387.4 mL H2/Lreactor/day, while our study obtained productivity at least two-fold higher (893 mL H2/Lreactor/day) compared with the process employing longer HRTs and gradually reducing them over time. This approach favored H2 production by promoting efficiency in organic matter degradation.

The highest H2 yield (89.3 mL H2/gVSadded) was obtained operating with an HRT of 1 day and the OLR 25.5 gCOD/L/day. This yield agrees with biohydrogen production from bulgur processing industry wastewater (90.8 mL H2/gVSadded) obtained from thermally pretreated inoculums (Bouchareb et al. 2021). The industrial production of bulgur involves several processes, such as cleaning, cooking, drying, tempering, peeling, and milling, producing wastewater with high VSs concentration (35 gVS/L) and alkalinity of 235 mgCaCO3/L (Bouchareb et al. 2021). The similarities between the bulgur and corn processing industries, along with the characteristics of cornWW, have resulted in comparable H2 yield production.

Various strategies, such as incorporating nanoparticles into the DF process, can further increase the H2 yields from food processing industrial wastewater (Bouchareb et al. 2022a). For example, using ferrite nanoparticles in milk processing wastewater resulted in significantly higher yields of 246 mL H2/gVSadded (Lakroun et al. 2023). Other strategies, such as enzymatic pretreatment, can enhance carbohydrate concentration in feedstock, e.g., using enzymatic hydrolysis (α-amylase) in potato waste. This approach can boost H2 production yields by 313% when applied in a DF process (Bouchareb et al. 2022b).

The percentage of removal for COD and VS increased as the HRT decreased (Table 2). In contrast, the removal of carbohydrates showed an opposite trend. This discrepancy may be due to the presence of other compounds in cornWW, such as proteins and lipids (Table 1), which may contribute to a lesser extent to H2 production or related processes since all these macromolecules ferment simultaneously during treatment. Notably, the high removal percentages achieved are remarkable considering that the raw substrate was used without any pretreatment. This contrasts with other industrial wastewaters, which often require modifications for effective treatment (Kargi et al. 2012; Bouchareb et al. 2023).

Table 2

Removal of organic matter in terms of COD, VS, and carbohydrates

HRT (day)CODI (g/L)VSI (g/L)CarbsI (g/L)CODF (g/L)VSF (g/L)CarbsF (g/L)COD removal (%)VS removal (%)Carbs removal (%)
24.0 ± 3.2 15.8 ± 4.6 10.8 ± 1.4 18.4 ± 3.5 10.4 ± 2.4 5.5 ± 1.5 23.1 33.9 49.3 
26.6 ± 2.8 16.2 ± 0.4 11.2 ± 0.1 20.6 ± 2.2 10.4 ± 0.9 6.1 ± 0.3 22.6 36.2 45.6 
31.3 ± 1.6 20.3 ± 1.5 12.9 ± 0.4 19.5 ± 1.6 11.5 ± 1.5 7.9 ± 1.0 37.8 43.4 38.9 
HRT (day)CODI (g/L)VSI (g/L)CarbsI (g/L)CODF (g/L)VSF (g/L)CarbsF (g/L)COD removal (%)VS removal (%)Carbs removal (%)
24.0 ± 3.2 15.8 ± 4.6 10.8 ± 1.4 18.4 ± 3.5 10.4 ± 2.4 5.5 ± 1.5 23.1 33.9 49.3 
26.6 ± 2.8 16.2 ± 0.4 11.2 ± 0.1 20.6 ± 2.2 10.4 ± 0.9 6.1 ± 0.3 22.6 36.2 45.6 
31.3 ± 1.6 20.3 ± 1.5 12.9 ± 0.4 19.5 ± 1.6 11.5 ± 1.5 7.9 ± 1.0 37.8 43.4 38.9 

Note. I: initial concentration and F: final concentration.

Table 3

MCFA and VFAs in terms of CODa

HRT (day)COD MCFAs/VFAs (g/L)% of COD MCFAs/VFAs
4.9 ± 0.5 27.8 
5.3 ± 1.3 26.1 
5.1 ± 0.8 26.6 
HRT (day)COD MCFAs/VFAs (g/L)% of COD MCFAs/VFAs
4.9 ± 0.5 27.8 
5.3 ± 1.3 26.1 
5.1 ± 0.8 26.6 

aCOD equivalents were based on those reported by Dahiya et al. (2023).

Despite the absence of pH control throughout the process, values lower than 4.5 were not registered, avoiding inhibition of bacteria involved in DF (Khanal et al. 2003; Zagrodnik & Łaniecki 2017). When the HRT was reduced to 2 and 1 day(s), the final pH values increased to 5.7 ± 0.4 and 5.8 ± 0.5, respectively (p < 0.05), evidencing a significant difference concerning the HRT at 4 days (5.3 ± 0.1). The observed increase in pH during the HRT of 2 and 1 day(s) is attributable to the hydrolysis of proteins from cornWW acting as buffers during the process. Generated amino acids have groups that can accept or donate protons, allowing them to balance the pH (Reddi 2020; Dizon & Buckin 2023).

Metabolites production

Metabolite production in HRT of 4 days, the most prevalent metabolites were butyric acid > caproic acid > acetic acid with average concentrations of 1.08 ± 0.23, 0.76 ± 0.27, and 0.72 ± 0.29, g/L, respectively (Figure 3). Conversely, for HRT 2 and 1 day(s), acetic acid predominated over butyric acid and caproic acid, with average concentrations ranging from 1.81 ± 0.65–1.88 ± 0.22, 0.77 ± 0.12–0.62 ± 0.20, and 0.54 ± 0.03–0.58 ± 0.12 g/L, respectively (Figure 3). In the raw cornWW, acetic acid and lactic acid were detected at concentrations of 1.0 ± 0.2 and 0.4 ± 0.1 g/L, respectively. The presence of lactic acid and acetic acid in the feed may enhance caproic acid generation, as the former acts as an electron donor while the latter serves as an electron acceptor (Hernández-Correa et al. 2023).
Figure 3

Production of MCFAs/VFAs during DF.

Figure 3

Production of MCFAs/VFAs during DF.

Close modal

The generation of the mentioned byproducts, along with H2, provides significant benefits as their market value ranges from approximately $600 to $2,000 US dollars per ton (Dinesh et al. 2018; Cieciura-Włoch et al. 2020). These biochemical byproducts are valuable in the industry due to their economic potential and diverse applications, serving as precursors for various biological processes (Dahiya et al. 2018).

On the other hand, the COD that was converted into MCFA and VFAs accounts for more than 20% of the remaining COD (Table 3). However, there are other non-quantified metabolites present, as well as an additional fraction of organic matter. This effluent has potential for future applications, such as in a methanogenic reactor, which could improve organic matter removal. Implementing this strategy would not only complete the product life cycle but also preserve its economic value.

Microbial community characterization

Inoculum predominantly consists of a rich diversity community dominated by archaea genera Methanobacterium (17.3%) and Methanosaeta (8.6%), and bacteria, including several genera with incidence below 1% (13.3%). The high taxonomic distribution offers potential benefits as different genera can adapt to operational conditions, potentially enhancing the process of acclimation (Figure 4). Raw cornWW exhibited different bacteria genera, including Pseudomonas (13.5%) and Clostridium (3.1%).
Figure 4

Dynamics of the microbial community during hydrogen production as a function of HRT.

Figure 4

Dynamics of the microbial community during hydrogen production as a function of HRT.

Close modal

The operation of the reactor led to the development of a microbial community with a composition of similar taxa (mainly Bifidobacterium, Atopobium, Caproiciproducens, Clostridium, Prevotella, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus). However, the relative abundance of these taxa varied depending on the different HRTs applied. The absence of methanogenic archaea, which were removed from the inoculum, demonstrates the effectiveness of the heat treatment. Although Caproiciproducens (0.1%), Lactobacillus (0.1%), and Enterococcus (0.5%) were identified among the microorganisms present in cornWW, their representation in Figure 4 is absent due to their relative abundance being below 1%. Nevertheless, these microorganisms successfully established themselves during the DF process.

Diverse bacterial genera play distinct roles in the microbial composition observed in the HRT of 4 days. Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Enterococcus may be associated with lactic acid production (Hanchi et al. 2018; Chenebault et al. 2022; Luo et al. 2024) while Atopobium contributes to acetic acid and H2 generation (Yang et al. 2019; Mercado et al. 2023). Clostridium and Prevotella may facilitate H2 and butyric acid production from organic acids such as acetic and lactic acids (Reis et al. 2015; García-Depraect et al. 2019; Wang & Yin 2021). The presence and production of lactic acid are generally viewed favorably in the context of DF. However, prolonged HRT with lactic acid and acetic acid may lead to competition among microorganisms. Caproiciprodecens has been identified as a potential producer of caproic acid from organic acids, its dominance over H2 production in the HRT of 4 days.

In this context, the presence and production of lactic acid were not considered a drawback but rather a favorable outcome within DF. García-Depraect et al. (2017) reported a similar metabolic pathway. However, in this study, it was observed that prolonged HRT, coupled with the presence of lactic acid and acetic acid, could lead to competition among the microorganisms involved. Specifically, Caproiciprodecens was identified as a potential producer of caproic acid from organic acids like acetic and lactic acids (Tang et al. 2022; Kurniawan et al. 2024). Consequently, caproic acid generation was observed to prevail over H2 production.

On the other hand, reducing HRT to 2 and 1 day(s) resulted in approximately a 60% decrease in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, while the relative abundance of Atopobium doubled. Moreover, there was an increase in H2 productivity (Figure 2), suggesting that the rise in Atopobium promoted H2 and acetic acid production. However, although the exact metabolic pathway of Atopobium remains incompletely defined to date, it has been observed that, despite the absence of hydrogenases in its genome, this bacterium is capable of independently producing H2 through a yet-to-be-characterized mechanism (Suzuki et al. 2018). Furthermore, the presence of Clostridium was crucial for H2 production, either from organic acids or carbohydrates.

DF for H2 production from cornWW shows promise, achieving remarkable yields without the need for strict pH control. A strategic reduction of HRT has led to a substantial increase in H2 productivity, reaching a maximum of 893.6 ± 0.1 NmL H2/Lreactor/day at an HRT of 1 day, driven by microbial adaptation. Reactor operational results demonstrated that decreasing the HRT increased the final pH values, as well as the percentages of COD and VS removal. The process results showed that a COD was converted into MCFA, and VFAs accounted for more than 20% of the remaining COD. The primary byproducts of H2 generation were acetic and butyric acid, along with other valuable byproducts, including caproic acid, emphasizing the potential for resource utilization. Microbial community analysis reveals specific genera, such as Atopobium and Clostridium, playing key roles in H2 and VFA production.

Financial support provided by DGAPA-UNAM through the PAPIIT project IN102722 is gratefully acknowledged. The project Grupos Interdisciplinarios de Investigación of the Institute of Engineering UNAM is also acknowledged. Monserrat Vazquez-López thanks CONAHCYT for the scholarship (702623). Gloria Moreno and Jaime Perez are acknowledged for their technical assistance.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ahmad
A.
,
Rambabu
K.
,
Hasan
S. W.
,
Show
P. L.
&
Banat
F.
(
2024
)
Biohydrogen production through dark fermentation: recent trends and advances in transition to a circular bioeconomy
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
52
,
335
357
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.05.161
.
Alvarez
A. J.
,
Fuentes
K. L.
,
Arias
C. A.
&
Chaparro
T. R.
(
2022
)
Production of hydrogen from beverage wastewater by dark fermentation in an internal circulation reactor: effect on pH and hydraulic retention time
,
Energy Conversion and Management: X
,
15
,
100232
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100232
.
APHA
(
2005
)
Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater
, 21st edn.
Washington, DC, USA: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation
.
Beszedes
S.
,
Kertesz
S.
,
Laszlo
Z.
,
Szabo
G.
&
Hodur
C.
(
2009
)
Biogas production of ozone and/or microwave-pretreated canned maize production sludge
,
Ozone: Science & Engineering
,
31
,
257
261
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01919510902841218
.
Bouchareb
E. M.
,
Kerroum
D.
,
Bezirhan Arikan
E.
,
Isik
Z.
&
Dizge
N.
(
2021
)
Production of bio-hydrogen from bulgur processing industry wastewater
,
Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects
,
1
14
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2021.1877853
.
Bouchareb
R.
,
Derbal
K.
,
Ozay
Y.
,
Niboucha
C.
,
Bouti
M.
,
Bouchareb
E. M.
&
Dizge
N.
(
2022a
)
Application of nanotechnology in anaerobic digestion for biohydrogen production improvement from natural coagulation/flocculation sludge using metallic oxide nanoparticles
,
Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects
,
44
(
3
),
8184
8197
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2022.2120931
.
Bouchareb
E. M.
,
Derbal
K.
,
Bedri
R.
,
Menas
S.
,
Bouchareb
R.
&
Dizge
N.
(
2022b
)
Enhanced fermentative hydrogen production from potato waste by enzymatic pretreatment
,
Environmental Technology
,
45
(
9
),
1801
1809
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2022.2154171
.
Bouchareb
E. M.
,
Derbal
K.
,
Bedri
R.
,
Slimani
K.
,
Menas
S.
,
Lazreg
H.
,
Maaref
F.
,
Ouabdelkader
S.
,
Saheb
A.
,
Bouaita
R.
,
Bouchareb
R.
&
Dizge
N.
(
2023
)
Improving biohydrogen production by dark fermentation of milk processing wastewater by physicochemical and enzymatic pretreatments
,
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
,
196
(
5
),
2741
2756
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-023-04619-2
.
Buitimea-Cantúa
N. E.
,
Antunes-Ricardo
M.
,
Gutiérrez-Uribe
J. A.
,
Del Refugio Rocha-Pizaña
M.
,
De la Rosa-Millán
J.
&
Torres-Chávez
P. I.
(
2020
)
Protein-phenolic aggregates with anti-inflammatory activity recovered from maize nixtamalization wastewaters (Nejayote)
,
LWT
,
134
,
109881
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109881
.
Campos-Flores
R. C.
,
Reyna-Gómez
L. M.
,
Suárez-Vázquez
S. I.
,
Robledo-Olivo
A.
&
Cruz-López
A.
(
2023
)
Effect of inoculum pretreatment and operational mode of reactor on BioH2 production from nixtamalization (Nejayote) and abattoir wastewater
,
Waste and Biomass Valorization
,
15
(
4
),
2145
2158
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02279-1
.
Carrillo-Reyes
J.
,
Tapia-Rodríguez
A.
,
Buitron
G.
,
Moreno-Andrade
I.
,
Palomo-Briones
R.
,
Razo-Flores
E.
,
Juárez
O. A.
,
Arreola-Vargas
J.
,
Bernet
N.
,
Braga
A. F. M.
,
Braga
L.
,
Castelló
E.
,
Chatellard
L.
,
Etchebehere
C.
,
Fuentes
L.
,
León-Becerril
E.
,
Mendez-Acosta
H. O.
,
Ruiz-Filippi
G.
,
Tapia-Venegas
E.
&
Zaiat
M.
(
2019
)
A standardized biohydrogen potential protocol: an international round robin test approach
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
44
(
48
),
26237
26247
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.124
.
Chenebault
C.
,
Moscoviz
R.
,
Trably
E.
,
Escudié
R.
&
Percheron
B.
(
2022
)
Lactic acid production from food waste using a microbial consortium: focus on key parameters for process upscaling and fermentation residues valorization
,
Bioresource Technology
,
354
,
127230
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127230
.
Cieciura-Włoch
W.
,
Borowski
S.
&
Otlewska
A.
(
2020
)
Biohydrogen production from fruit and vegetable waste, sugar beet pulp and corn silage via dark fermentation
,
Renewable Energy
,
153
,
1226
1237
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.085
.
Dahiya
S.
,
Kumar
A. N.
,
Sravan
J. S.
,
Chatterjee
S.
,
Sarkar
O.
&
Mohan
S. V.
(
2018
)
Food waste biorefinery: sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy
,
Bioresource Technology
,
248
,
2
12
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176
.
Dahiya
S.
,
Lingam
Y.
&
Mohan
S. V.
(
2023
)
Understanding acidogenesis towards green hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production – critical analysis and circular economy perspective
,
Chemical Engineering Journal
,
464
,
141550
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.141550
.
David
B.
,
Federico
B.
,
Cristina
C.
,
Marco
G.
,
Federico
M.
&
Paolo
P.
(
2019
)
Biohythane production from food wastes
. In:
Pandey, A., Mohan, S. V., Chang, J.-S., Hallenbeck, P. C. & Larroche, C. (eds)
Biohydrogen
.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier eBooks
, pp.
347
368
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-64203-5.00013-7
.
Del Angel-Acosta
Y. A.
,
Alvarez
L. H.
,
Garcia-Reyes
R. B.
,
Carrillo-Reyes
J.
,
Garcia-Gonzalez
A.
&
Meza-Escalante
E. R.
(
2021
)
Co-digestion of corn (Nejayote) and brewery wastewater at different ratios and pH conditions for biohydrogen production
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
46
(
54
),
27422
27430
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.05.208
.
Dinesh
G. K.
,
Chauhan
R.
&
Chakma
S.
(
2018
)
Influence and strategies for enhanced biohydrogen production from food waste
,
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
,
92
,
807
822
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.05.009
.
Dizon
M.
&
Buckin
V.
(
2023
)
Ultrasonic monitoring of enzymatic hydrolysis of proteins. 1. Effects of ionisation
,
Food Hydrocolloids
,
144
,
108866
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108866
.
DuBois
M.
,
Gilles
K. A.
,
Hamilton
J. K.
,
Rebers
P. A.
&
Smith
F.
(
1956
)
Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances
,
Analytical Chemistry
,
28
(
3
),
350
356
.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017
.
España-Gamboa
E.
,
Domínguez-Maldonado
J. A.
,
Tapia-Tussell
R.
,
Chale-Canul
J. S.
&
Alzate-Gaviria
L.
(
2017
)
Corn industrial wastewater (Nejayote): a promising substrate in Mexico for methane production in a coupled system (APCR-UASB)
,
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
,
25
(
1
),
712
722
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0479-z
.
Ewida
A. Y. I.
(
2020
)
Bio-treatment of maize processing wastewater using indigenous microorganisms
,
Sustainable Environment Research
,
30
,
art. 3
.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42834-020-0044-1
.
García-Depraect
O.
,
Gómez-Romero
J.
,
León-Becerril
E.
&
López-López
A.
(
2017
)
A novel biohydrogen production process: co-digestion of vinasse and Nejayote as complex raw substrates using a robust inoculum
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
42
(
9
),
5820
5831
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.204
.
García-Depraect
O.
,
Rene
E. R.
,
Gómez-Romero
J.
,
López-López
A.
&
León-Becerril
E.
(
2019
)
Enhanced biohydrogen production from the dark co-fermentation of tequila vinasse and nixtamalization wastewater: novel insights into ecological regulation by pH
,
Fuel
,
253
,
159
166
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.147
.
Ghimire
A.
,
Frunzo
L.
,
Pirozzi
F.
,
Trably
E.
,
Escudie
R.
,
Lens
P. N.
&
Esposito
G.
(
2015
)
A review on dark fermentative biohydrogen production from organic biomass: process parameters and use of by-products
,
Applied Energy
,
144
,
73
95
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.045
.
González-Tenorio
D.
,
Muñoz-Páez
K. M.
&
Valdez-Vazquez
I.
(
2020
)
Butanol production coupled with acidogenesis and CO2 conversion for improved carbon utilization
,
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery
,
12
(
6
),
2121
2131
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00805-y
.
Hanchi
H.
,
Mottawea
W.
,
Sebei
K.
&
Hammami
R.
(
2018
)
The genus Enterococcus: between probiotic potential and safety concerns – an update
,
Frontiers in Microbiology
, 3 (9), 1791.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01791
.
Harder
B.
,
Noyola
A.
,
Durán-Hinojosa
U.
,
Moreno-Andrade
I.
,
Morgan-Sagastume
J. M.
,
Alatriste-Mondragón
F.
,
López-Hernández
J. E.
,
Ramírez-Higareda
B. L.
,
Castro-Martínez
M.
&
Leyva-Huitrón
R.
(
2020
)
Feedstock Databse for Biogas in Mexico
.
Danish Climate and Energy Partnership Programme in Mexico 2017-2020. Available at: https://ibtech.com.mx/uploads/medios/Feedstock%20database_final_230419.pdf (Accessed: 13 May 2024)
.
Hernández-Correa
E.
,
De María Cuervo-López
F.
,
Cervantes
F. J.
&
Buitrón
G.
(
2023
)
Efficient conversion of wine lees into medium-chain carboxylic acids by mixed culture using an in-line extraction system
,
Journal of Water Process Engineering
,
55
,
104263
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104263
.
Inoue
R. K.
,
Lima
D. M. F.
,
Rodrigues
J. A. D.
,
Ratusznei
S. M.
&
Zaiat
M.
(
2014
)
Effect of organic loading rate and fill time on the biohydrogen production in a mechanically stirred AnSBBR treating synthetic sucrose-based wastewater
,
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
,
174
(
6
),
2326
2349
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-1205-7
.
Kang
J.
,
Wei
Y.
,
Liu
L.
,
Han
R.
,
Yu
B.
&
Wang
J.
(
2020
)
Energy systems for climate change mitigation: a systematic review
,
Applied Energy
,
263
,
114602
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114602
.
Kargi
F.
,
Eren
N. S.
&
Ozmihci
S.
(
2012
)
Hydrogen gas production from cheese whey powder (CWP) solution by thermophilic dark fermentation
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
37
(
3
),
2260
2266
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.11.018
.
Khanal
S. K.
,
Chen
W.
,
Li
L.
&
Sung
S.
(
2003
)
Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.
, 29 (11), 1123–1131.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2003.11.002
.
Kurniawan
E.
,
O-Thong
S.
,
Cheirsilp
B.
&
Gagnon
Y.
(
2024
)
Optimizing continuous medium-chain fatty acid production from biohydrogenic palm oil mill effluent: operational parameters and microbial dynamics
,
Journal of Cleaner Production
,
436
,
140670
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140670
.
Lakroun
S. E.
,
Boutemak
K.
,
Haddad
A.
,
Bouchareb
E. M.
&
Bouchareb
R.
(
2023
)
Enhanced fermentative biohydrogen production from milk processing wastewater by magnetic spinel ferrites nanoparticles
,
Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects
,
45
(
1
),
3138
3153
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2193562
.
Lowry
O.
,
Rosebrough
N.
,
Farr
A. L.
&
Randall
R.
(
1951
)
Protein measurment with the Folin phenol reagent
,
Journal of Biological Chemistry
,
193
(
1
),
265
275
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(19)52451-6
.
Luo
L.
,
Lim
R.
&
Pradhan
N.
(
2024
)
Lactic acid-based fermentative hydrogen production from kitchen waste: mechanisms and taxonomic insights
,
Chemical Engineering Journal
,
488
,
150854
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.150854
.
Mercado
J. V.
,
Koyama
M.
&
Nakasaki
K.
(
2023
)
Complexity of acclimatization substrate affects anaerobic digester microbial community response to organic load shocks
,
Environmental Research
,
216
,
114722
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114722
.
Mishra
S. K.
,
Suh
W. I.
,
Farooq
W.
,
Moon
M.
,
Shrivastav
A.
,
Park
M. S.
&
Yang
J.
(
2014
)
Rapid quantification of microalgal lipids in aqueous medium by a simple colorimetric method
,
Bioresource Technology
,
155
,
330
333
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.077
.
Muñoz-Páez
K. M.
,
Alvarado-Michi
E. L.
,
Buitrón
G.
&
Valdez-Vazquez
I.
(
2019
)
Distinct effects of furfural, hydroxymethylfurfural and its mixtures on dark fermentation hydrogen production and microbial structure of a mixed culture
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
44
(
4
),
2289
2297
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.04.139
.
Reddi
A. S.
(
2020
)
Acid-Base disorders
.
Newark, NJ, USA: Springer eBooks
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28895-2
.
Regueira-Marcos
L.
,
Muñoz
R.
&
García-Depraect
O.
(
2023
)
Continuous lactate-driven dark fermentation of restaurant food waste: process characterization and new insights on transient feast/famine perturbations
,
Bioresource Technology
,
385
,
129385
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129385
.
Reis
C. M. D.
,
Carosia
M. F.
,
Sakamoto
I. K.
,
Varesche
M. B. A.
&
Silva
E. L.
(
2015
)
Evaluation of hydrogen and methane production from sugarcane vinasse in an anaerobic fluidized bed reactor
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
40
(
27
),
8498
8509
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.04.136
.
Salazar-Batres
K. J.
&
Moreno-Andrade
I.
(
2022
)
Effect of nickel concentration on biohydrogen production: organic solid waste vs. glucose
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
47
(
70
),
30097
30106
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.281
.
Seengenyoung
J.
,
Mamimin
C.
,
Prasertsan
P.
&
O-Thong
S.
(
2019
)
Pilot-scale of biohythane production from palm oil mill effluent by two-stage thermophilic anaerobic fermentation
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
44
(
6
),
3347
3355
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.021
.
Suzuki
A.
,
Ito
M.
,
Hamaguchi
T.
,
Mori
H.
,
Takeda
Y.
,
Baba
R.
,
Watanabe
T.
,
Kurokawa
K.
,
Asakawa
S.
,
Hirayama
M.
&
Ohno
K.
(
2018
)
Quantification of hydrogen production by intestinal bacteria that are specifically dysregulated in Parkinson's disease
,
PLoS ONE
,
13
(
12
),
e0208313
.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208313
.
Tang
J.
,
Dai
K.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Zheng
S.
,
Hong
S.
,
Zeng
R. J.
&
Zhang
F.
(
2022
)
Caproate production from xylose via the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway by genus Caproiciproducens dominated mixed culture fermentation
,
Bioresource Technology Bioresource Technology
,
351
,
126978
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126978
.
UNESCO
(
2023
)
The United Nations World Water Development Report 2023: Partnerships and Cooperation for Water
.
Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing
. .
Valderrama-Bravo
C.
,
Fuentes-Prado
E.
,
Porras-Godínez
M. R.
,
Ramírez-Ortiz
M.
,
Reyna-Granados
M. A.
&
Gutiérrez-Cortez
E.
(
2022
)
Mechanical separation of a nixtamalization by-product (Nejayote) and scaling of filtration conditions from a pilot filter to a press filter of higher area
,
Journal of Food Engineering
,
328
,
111058
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111058
.
Valero
D.
,
Rico
C.
,
Canto-Canché
B.
,
Domínguez-Maldonado
J.
,
Tapia-Tussell
R.
,
Cortes-Velazquez
A.
&
Alzate-Gaviria
L.
(
2018
)
Enhancing biochemical methane potential and enrichment of specific electroactive communities from nixtamalization wastewater using granular activated carbon as a conductive material
,
Energies
,
11
(
8
),
2101
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en11082101
.
Vázquez-López
M.
&
Moreno-Andrade
I.
(
2024
)
Biohydrogen production by co-digestion of food waste and corn industry wastewater
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
, (in press),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.03.315
.
Vázquez-López
M.
,
Jiménez-Ocampo
U. E.
&
Moreno-Andrade
I.
(
2023
)
Tratamiento anaerobio y valorización energética de las aguas residuales del proceso de nixtamalización del maíz: una revisión
,
Revista AIDIS
,
16
(
1
),
309
325
.
https://doi.org/10.22201/iingen.0718378xe.2023.16.1.85041
.
Wang
J.
&
Yin
Y.
(
2021
)
Clostridium species for fermentative hydrogen production: an overview
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
46
(
70
),
34599
34625
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.052
.
Yang
G.
,
Fang
H.
,
Wang
J.
,
Jia
H.
&
Zhang
H.
(
2019
)
Enhanced anaerobic digestion of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) by blast furnace dust (BFD): feasibility and mechanism
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
44
(
33
),
17709
17719
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.154
.
Zagrodnik
R.
&
Łaniecki
M.
(
2017
)
The effect of pH on cooperation between dark- and photo-fermentative bacteria in a co-culture process for hydrogen production from starch
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
42
(
5
),
2878
2888
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.12.150
.
Zavala-Méndez
M.
,
Vargas
A.
&
Carrillo-Reyes
J.
(
2022
)
Maximization of bio-hydrogen production from winery vinasses using on-line feedback control
,
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
,
47
(
78
),
33259
33271
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.196
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).