Abstract
Although spinel ferrite (MFe2O4, M = Zn, Ni, Mn, etc.) has been reported as a promising catalyst, its low photocatalytic activity under visible light greatly restricts its practical application. Spinel ferrite-based photocatalytic composites have exhibited improved efficiency for pollutant degradation, due to interface charge carrier mobility and structural modification. Meanwhile, due to its magnetism and stability, spinel ferrite composite can be easily recycled for long-term utilization, showing its high application potential. In this review, the recent advances in the construction and photocatalytic degradation of spinel ferrite composites are discussed, with an emphasis on the relationship between structural property and photocatalytic activity. In addition, to improve their photocatalytic application, the challenges, gaps and future research prospects are proposed.
HIGHLIGHTS
The development of spinel ferrite-based photocatalysts was reviewed.
The heterojunction of spinel ferrite and other photocatalysts was reported.
The preparation processes of photocatalytic heterojunctions were summarized.
The mechanism of photocatalytic heterojunctions was illustrated and compared.
Future research suggestions were proposed.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the heavy consumption of organic compounds, such as organic dyes, phenols, and pharmaceuticals, has resulted in large amounts of debris in the natural aquatic environment, originating from industrial effluents (Shao et al. 2021). The increased discharge of organic pollutants has aroused considerable attention worldwide, due to their threat to human health (Rodriguez-Mozaz et al. 2015). This environmental issue has been considered a tough problem that urgently needs to be addressed since conventional treatment methods can hardly eliminate these pollutants due to their stable molecular structure (Agunbiade & Moodley 2016). Advanced oxidation processes have been reported as an effective route to eliminate these refractory compounds (Michael-Kordatou et al. 2018), and among various processes, photocatalysis has attracted large attention (Xing et al. 2018; Zhu et al. 2022). The main reason is its green and eco-friendly features: no requirement of fossil energy and chemical reagents (only solar energy), the conversion of toxic organic compounds into less toxic intermediates, and eventually inorganic substances (Nair et al. 2021).
Most reported photocatalysts are in powder form, which requires an additional process to collect them from water (Arora et al. 2021). The high cost of recycling photocatalysts greatly restricts its practical application potential. Because of this, spinel ferrite has been introduced to the photocatalytic system due to its magnetic property, which ensures high recycle performance via magnetic separation (Shah et al. 2022). However, its low photocatalytic activity under visible light greatly restricts its practical application.

(a) Sunlight spectrum (Casbeer et al. 2012); (b–e) band structures and charge carrier migration directions in the (b) Z-scheme, (c) type-I, (d) type-II, and (e) type-III heterojunction (Li et al. 2021); (f–h) demonstration of three types of spinel ferrite: (f) normal spinel (MgAl2O4), (g) inverse spinel (NiFe2O4) and (h) complex spinel (CuAl2O4) (Qin et al. 2021).
(a) Sunlight spectrum (Casbeer et al. 2012); (b–e) band structures and charge carrier migration directions in the (b) Z-scheme, (c) type-I, (d) type-II, and (e) type-III heterojunction (Li et al. 2021); (f–h) demonstration of three types of spinel ferrite: (f) normal spinel (MgAl2O4), (g) inverse spinel (NiFe2O4) and (h) complex spinel (CuAl2O4) (Qin et al. 2021).
In order to overcome both restrictions, the construction of a photocatalytic composite with two or more semiconductors has been intensively studied, and the enhanced photocatalytic performance is ascribed to the appropriate band alignment. Figure 1(b)–1(e) presents four different band alignment strategies. Figure 1(c) presents type-I heterojunction (straddling-gap junction) (Jabbar et al. 2023), in which the photo-induced e− and h+ from photocatalytic semiconductor II (PS II) all migrate to photocatalytic semiconductor I (PS I). This accumulates the recombination of charge carriers, leading to reduced photocatalytic activity. Figure 1(d) presents a type-II heterojunction (staggered-gap junction), in which photo-induced e− and h+ migrate to relatively lower energy bands (Jiang et al. 2022). This hinders the recombination of charge carriers and improves photocatalytic activity, yet reduces the total redox ability since charge carriers end up gathering in bands with low energy potentials. Figure 1(e) presents a type-III heterojunction (broken-gap junction), in which photo-induced charge carriers stay in the original PS bands without interface migration (Li et al. 2022b). This makes no contribution to photocatalytic efficiency since there is no interaction and synergy between PS I and PS II.
Figure 1(b) presents a special case of heterojunction similar to staggered-gap junction (type-II, Figure 1(d)), that is, Z-scheme heterojunction (Liu et al. 2022b). In this scenario, e− in PS II moves toward PS I, meanwhile, h+ in PS I moves toward PS II, until both charge carriers recombine, leaving e− with high reductive potential at the CB of PS I and h+ with high oxidative potential at the VB of PS II. Z-scheme heterojunction preserves the high redox ability of charge carriers, which is beneficial to the complete degradation of organic pollutants. In conclusion, staggered-gap junction (type-II) and Z-scheme heterojunction are promising strategies for improving photocatalytic activity, especially Z-scheme photocatalytic heterojunction composites.
The general molecular formula of spinel ferrites is MFe2O4, where M stands for divalent ions, such as Ni2+, Zn2+, Mn2+ (Dasgupta et al. 2016). There are three types of spinel based on the difference in crystal structure: normal spinel, inverse spinel, and complex spinel (Zhao et al. 2017). As for normal spinel (Figure 1(f)), such as ZnFe2O4, Zn2+ and Fe3+ are located at tetrahedral and octahedral sites, respectively (Li et al. 2019). As for inverse spinel (Figure 1), such as NiFe2O4, Ni2+ and half of Fe3+ occupy octahedral sites, and the other half of Fe3+ occupies tetrahedral sites (Nawaz et al. 2020). As for complex spinel (Figure 1), such as MnFe2O4, Mn2+, and Fe3+ randomly occupy tetrahedral and octahedral sites, and 20% of Mn2+ ions occupy octahedral sites and 80% of Mn2+ ions occupy at tetrahedral sites (Kefeni et al. 2017).
The keyword analysis of reported scientific literature works helps to describe topic(s) in a specific research area. As for all published papers, the authors generally set a list of keywords to describe the main focus of their work, as well as the essential concepts. Sometimes editors and reviewers also added more keywords based on the corresponding research field(s), which ends up with hundreds of keywords related to a certain research field (Padilla et al. 2018). VOSviewer software provides the option to choose keywords from all sources, including authors and publishers.
The keyword occurrence network visualization map in the field of spinel ferrite.
The keyword occurrence network visualization map in the field of spinel ferrite.
The terms ‘synthesis’ and ‘structural’ are the most used keywords. Both keywords are highly related to the physicochemical properties, which affect its photocatalytic property. Thus, in this review, the connections between the synthesis method, structural property and photocatalytic activity are discussed.
In recent decades, nano-sized spinel ferrites have been intensively studied, especially their catalytic application in the environmental remediation field (Li et al. 2004). Compared with bulk materials (large-sized), nanoparticles exhibit superior catalytic performance, optical properties, and chemical stability (Du et al. 2016). These advantages make nano-sized spinel ferrite a suitable catalytic material for practical application (Rostami et al. 2013). Especially, nanoscale spinel ferrite exhibits superparamagnetic properties, which enables spinel ferrite-based composite to be easily recycled via external magnet (Nadimi et al. 2019). However, the disadvantages of pristine spinel ferrite restrict its catalytic activity: high agglomeration and rapid charge carrier recombination (Zhu et al. 2019). To address these problems, a great many types of research have been conducted on developing spinel ferrite-based composites with high photocatalytic activity (Chandrasekaran et al. 2018; Qin et al. 2021). This paper aims at providing a timely and systematical review of the design and photocatalytic degradation of spinel ferrite (ZnFe2O4, NiFe2O4 and MnFe2O4)-based composites, offering an inspiring and useful discussion on the relationship between structural property and photocatalytic activity, as well as future research suggestions.
SPINEL FERRITE/CARBON MATERIAL
Although spinel ferrite has been considered a promising catalyst, the low photocatalytic activity under visible light greatly restricts its practical application (Gebreslassie et al. 2019; Leonel et al. 2021). One of the reported methods to develop high-performance photocatalysts is the combination of photocatalysts with functional materials (Fouad et al. 2021). Carbon-based materials, such as graphene and graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), are described as follows.
Spinel ferrite/graphene
As one of the forms of carbon, graphene presents a unique crystal structure, which endows it with different properties. In 2004, Novoselov et al. reported the two-dimensional morphology of graphene, as well as its astonishing electric field effect (Novoselov et al. 2004). In 2010, Geim and Novoselov were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics, due to their outstanding contribution to the research field of graphene (Li et al. 2022a). Because of its ultrahigh tensile strength and specific surface area, abundant surface functional groups, excellent electronic and thermal conductivity, and superior chemical and thermal stability, graphene has been intensively studied in the fields of electronics, electric batteries, semiconductor and composite (Yu et al. 2020). In recent years, graphene has been used as the carrier of various photocatalysts (Dutta et al. 2019). In this section, the main preparation methods of spinel ferrite and its graphene-based composite are discussed, and the brief information of these papers is summarized in Table 1.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/graphene photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4@graphene nanosheets | Hydrothermal method | Congo red; 15 mg L−1 | 300 W Xenon lamp, 2.0 W cm−2; 0.5 g L−1 | 88.66%/240 min | Jiang et al. (2020) |
NiFe2O4@graphene oxide | Sol–gel auto-combustion method | Methylene blue; 0.04 mM | 10 W UV lamp (λ = 254 nm); 0.5 g L−1; pH = 10 | 90.84%/150 min | Bayantong et al. (2021) |
MnFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide | Co-precipitation method | Methylene blue; 10 mg L−1 | UV lamp (λ = 365 nm, Intensity = 40 W); 0.3 g L−1 | 97.00%/60 min | Mandal et al. (2020) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4@graphene nanosheets | Hydrothermal method | Congo red; 15 mg L−1 | 300 W Xenon lamp, 2.0 W cm−2; 0.5 g L−1 | 88.66%/240 min | Jiang et al. (2020) |
NiFe2O4@graphene oxide | Sol–gel auto-combustion method | Methylene blue; 0.04 mM | 10 W UV lamp (λ = 254 nm); 0.5 g L−1; pH = 10 | 90.84%/150 min | Bayantong et al. (2021) |
MnFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide | Co-precipitation method | Methylene blue; 10 mg L−1 | UV lamp (λ = 365 nm, Intensity = 40 W); 0.3 g L−1 | 97.00%/60 min | Mandal et al. (2020) |
The first one is the hydrothermal method, which uses water as medium and requires high temperature (100–300 °C) at high pressure (1–30 MPa) in a confined container to produce nanocrystals (Soufi et al. 2021). This is currently the most widely used preparation method. At these extreme conditions, all precursors (metal ions) in water acquire high energy, which greatly accelerates the crystallization process (Narang & Pubby 2021).
(a) Schematic illustration for the ZnFe2O4@GNs hydrothermal preparation route; (b) SEM image of graphene nanosheets (GNs); (c) SEM image of ZnFe2O4@GNs; (d) UV-visible light absorption spectra of various catalysts; (e) adsorption comparison of Congo red using various catalysts; (f) the recycle test performance for four successive turns; (g and h) before and after the magnetic recovery; (i) possible mechanism of decolorization of CR over ZnFe2O4@GNs under simulated solar light (Jiang et al. 2020).
(a) Schematic illustration for the ZnFe2O4@GNs hydrothermal preparation route; (b) SEM image of graphene nanosheets (GNs); (c) SEM image of ZnFe2O4@GNs; (d) UV-visible light absorption spectra of various catalysts; (e) adsorption comparison of Congo red using various catalysts; (f) the recycle test performance for four successive turns; (g and h) before and after the magnetic recovery; (i) possible mechanism of decolorization of CR over ZnFe2O4@GNs under simulated solar light (Jiang et al. 2020).
Another preparation strategy is the sol–gel auto-combustion method, which also uses metal ions as precursors. During the preparation period, metal salts are fully dissolved into water or ethanol by vigorous stirring, under alkaline conditions (Bhandare et al. 2020). After several hours, the obtained gel is heated (dehydrated, 80–90 °C) and calcinated at 450–800 °C (Bhandare et al. 2020).
Luna et al. immobilized NiFe2O4 nanoparticles onto graphene oxide (GO) via this method, denoted as NiFe2O4@GO, which exhibited superior photocatalytic degradation toward dye methylene blue compared with pure NiFe2O4 (Bayantong et al. 2021). This result was also ascribed to the excellent electric conductivity and adsorption ability of GO. As one derivative of graphene, GO also had four functions to enhance the catalytic activity of spinel ferrite. However, this composite only exhibited photocatalytic activity under UV irradiation, only a tiny part of sunlight energy. The substrate GO cannot alter the band structure of NiFe2O4, and thus cannot extend its light absorption range. This greatly restricted the practical application of NiFe2O4@GO. It is suggested that visible-light-driven component should be introduced to extend the light response range of NiFe2O4. The key factor during sol–gel auto-combustion is the calcination temperature, which affects the particle size and crystallinity (Khalid et al. 2021).
The third preparation strategy is the co-precipitation method, which utilizes metal precipitation as the precursor. The precipitation is formed by mixing two or more metal ions in a solution. The precipitation is then calcinated to obtain spinel ferrite (Rabi et al. 2021).
Bidisha et al. decorated MnFe2O4 onto reduced GO (MnFe2O4/rGO) via this method (Mandal et al. 2020). The sphere-like MnFe2O4 nanoparticles were well-dispersed onto rGO nanosheets with reduced agglomeration, which improved the surface condition of MnFe2O4/rGO. MnFe2O4/rGO presented higher photodegradation efficiency toward methylene blue, much better than that of bare MnFe2O4. As another derivative of graphene, rGO also exhibited four functions to enhance the catalytic activity of spinel ferrite. The limitation of this work is also the utilization of UV light, which restricted its practical application. Various factors affect the structural properties (particle size and shape) of spinel ferrite during the co-precipitation process: salt precursor, solution medium, temperature, pH and extra surfactant (Haneef et al. 2021).
Different preparation methods have unique advantages and disadvantages. As for the hydrothermal method, due to the extreme conditions, the obtained product often exhibits controlled particle size, morphology and nanocrystal dispersion. However, this method also has its shortcomings, such as relatively low output amount and safety of production equipment (Zhu et al. 2021). As for the sol–gel auto-combustion method, the product often has good uniformity and purity; however, the fabrication conditions are highly uncontrollable, and unwanted byproducts are formed (Khalid et al. 2021). As for the co-precipitation route, it has been considered a facile and cost-effective method for spinel ferrite fabrication, however, currently, the obtained products exhibit poor crystallinity (Rabi et al. 2021). This method has great potential for the development of large-scale production, once this problem can be addressed (Soylak et al. 2021).
Although graphene and its derivatives have many functions to improve the photocatalytic performance of spinel ferrite, they can't change its light response range, in other words, NiFe2O4 or MnFe2O4 still can't be activated by visible light after immobilized onto these substrates. These spinel ferrites should combine other semiconductors and form a heterojunction composite to extend their light absorption range and realize high solar light utilization.
Spinel ferrite/g-C3N4
Wang et al. reported for the first time that graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) exhibited visible-light-driven photocatalytic activity (Wang et al. 2009). Due to its fascinating properties, g-C3N4 is a promising n-type semiconductor, with abandgap of 2.7 eV (Balakrishnan & Chinthala 2022). Different from other carbon nitride compounds, g-C3N4 exhibits a unique delocalized conjugate molecular structure, which is composed of stacking carbon nitride layers interconnected via amines (Fu et al. 2018). The unique two-dimensional structure, as well as the strong bonding between C and N atoms, result in excellent electronic conductivity, and high chemical and thermal stability (Ismael 2020). However, its practical application is restricted due to low photocatalytic performance, owing to its rapid electron–hole pair recombination, low specific surface area and low adsorption ability (Mishra et al. 2019; Truong et al. 2022). Moreover, the long recovery operation of g-C3N4 from water also hinders its commercial application potential (Zhao et al. 2021b). Recently, spinel ferrite/g-C3N4 heterojunctions show excellent solar-to-chemical energy conversion rates (Das & Chowdhury 2021). These composites exhibit interesting properties: unique structural properties, extended light absorption range, enhance charge carrier mobility and high redox capability, as well as facile magnetic recycling ability (Keerthana et al. 2022). All these greatly improve the photodegradation performance. The micro-structures of these composites are discussed in this section, such as type-II heterojunction, p–n junction and S-scheme structure. The brief information of these papers is summarized in Table 2.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/g-C3N4 photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/g-C3N4 | Solvothermal method | Methylene blue, 10 mg L−1; Rhodamine B, 10 mg L−1; Tetracycline hydrochloride, 10 mg L−1; | 300 W Xenon lamp with UV filter as visible light source, 0.3 g L−1 | Methylene blue, 98.00%/120 min; Rhodamine B, 100%/120 min; Tetracycline hydrochloride, 95.00%/210 min | Wu et al. (2018) |
MnFe2O4/g-C3N4 | Calcination method | Rhodamine B, 30 mg L−1 | Sunlight irradiation; 0.4 g L−1 | 97.20%/90 min | Xie et al. (2022) |
NiFe2O4/g-C3N4 | Hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 20 mg L−1 | 30 W LED lamp (400 nm < λ < 760 nm) as visible light source; 0.1 g L−1; pH = 5 | 78.00%/120 min | Lu et al. (2023) |
ZnFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide/g-C3N4 | Solvothermal method | Malachite green, 10−5 M | 15 W white LED, 418–700 nm; 0.5 g L−1 | 63.00%/150 min | Tsvetkov et al. (2020) |
g-C3N4/MnFe2O4/graphene | Solvothermal method | Metronidazole, 20 mg L−1; Amoxicillin, 20 mg L−1; Tetracycline, 20 mg L−1; Ciprofloxacin, 10 mg L−1; | 300 W Xe lamp with a 400 nm cutoff filter; 0.01 mol L−1 persulfate; 1.0 g L−1 | Metronidazole, 94.50%/60 min (0.0337 min−1); Amoxicillin, (0.017 min−1); Tetracycline, 91.50%/60 min (0.027 min−1); Ciprofloxacin, (0.043 min−1) | Wang et al. (2017) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/g-C3N4 | Solvothermal method | Methylene blue, 10 mg L−1; Rhodamine B, 10 mg L−1; Tetracycline hydrochloride, 10 mg L−1; | 300 W Xenon lamp with UV filter as visible light source, 0.3 g L−1 | Methylene blue, 98.00%/120 min; Rhodamine B, 100%/120 min; Tetracycline hydrochloride, 95.00%/210 min | Wu et al. (2018) |
MnFe2O4/g-C3N4 | Calcination method | Rhodamine B, 30 mg L−1 | Sunlight irradiation; 0.4 g L−1 | 97.20%/90 min | Xie et al. (2022) |
NiFe2O4/g-C3N4 | Hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 20 mg L−1 | 30 W LED lamp (400 nm < λ < 760 nm) as visible light source; 0.1 g L−1; pH = 5 | 78.00%/120 min | Lu et al. (2023) |
ZnFe2O4/reduced graphene oxide/g-C3N4 | Solvothermal method | Malachite green, 10−5 M | 15 W white LED, 418–700 nm; 0.5 g L−1 | 63.00%/150 min | Tsvetkov et al. (2020) |
g-C3N4/MnFe2O4/graphene | Solvothermal method | Metronidazole, 20 mg L−1; Amoxicillin, 20 mg L−1; Tetracycline, 20 mg L−1; Ciprofloxacin, 10 mg L−1; | 300 W Xe lamp with a 400 nm cutoff filter; 0.01 mol L−1 persulfate; 1.0 g L−1 | Metronidazole, 94.50%/60 min (0.0337 min−1); Amoxicillin, (0.017 min−1); Tetracycline, 91.50%/60 min (0.027 min−1); Ciprofloxacin, (0.043 min−1) | Wang et al. (2017) |
Wu et al. prepared hierarchical ZnFe2O4/g-C3N4 heterojunction by solvothermal method (Wu et al. 2018). Typical microspheres were formed by ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles, and their diameter was limited due to the confined space effect of g-C3N4. Compared with pure ZnFe2O4, ZnFe2O4/g-C3N4 showed promoted photodegradation performance toward organic dyes under visible light. The composite was reported as a type-II heterojunction. The CB edge of g-C3N4 was more negative than that of ZnFe2O4, while the VB edge of ZnFe2O4 was more positive than that of g-C3N4. After irradiation, the photo-induced e− migrated from g-C3N4 to ZnFe2O4, and the photo-induced h+ moved in the opposite direction. This migration promoted charge carrier separation, thus prolonging the lifetime and enhancing photocatalytic performance. Above all, the construction of heterojunction should follow the energy band matching principle, as well as close contact between components (Huang et al. 2018). However, ZnFe2O4/g-C3N4 composite exhibited reduced redox ability, due to the less positive VB position and less negative CB position. As for ZnFe2O4/g-C3N4, despite its enhanced charge carrier mobility, further, development is needed due to its poor redox ability.
Different from ZnFe2O4, NiFe2O4 and MnFe2O4 are p-type semiconductors (Jiang et al. 2021; Agboola et al. 2022), thus the micro-structure properties of NiFe2O4/g-C3N4 and MnFe2O4/g-C3N4 should be attributed as p–n junctions (Kong et al. 2022). When a p–n junction is built, an internal electric field is formed at the interface region due to electron (from an n-type semiconductor) and hole (from a p-type semiconductor) diffusion. Similar to type-II heterojunction, during light irradiation, electrons move to less negative CB while holes move to less positive VB due to the internal electric field, resulting in prolonged charge carrier lifetime and promoted photocatalytic activity. Xie et al. prepared MnFe2O4/g-C3N4 and evaluated the photocatalytic activity by Rhodamine B photodegradation (Xie et al. 2022). The composite with 30 wt% MnFe2O4 exhibited the highest photocatalytic activity under visible light. The reusability tests proved that, after five cycles, the photodegradation rate slightly dropped, implying its excellent stability and convenience in recovery. The interface contact between MnFe2O4 and g-C3N4, and the formation of an internal electric field greatly enhanced charge carrier mobility due to their energy band positions. The p–n junctions exhibit enhanced photocatalytic activity as well as excellent recyclability and stability, proving their high potential to be applied in wastewater treatment.
S-scheme heterojunction mechanism about the charge carrier transfer between g-C3N4 (CN) and NiFe2O4 (NFO) (Lu et al. 2023).
S-scheme heterojunction mechanism about the charge carrier transfer between g-C3N4 (CN) and NiFe2O4 (NFO) (Lu et al. 2023).
Due to the excellent electron conductivity, graphene can also be introduced to g-C3N4 to improve its photocatalytic performance. Up to now, plenty of papers on g-C3N4/graphene have been published, however, the combination of g-C3N4/graphene and spinel ferrite has seldom been reported. It is believed that the combination of heterojunction and graphene can greatly enhance photocatalytic efficiency (Hafeez et al. 2023).
In 2020, Tsvetkov et al. reported the ternary ZnFe2O4/rGO/g-C3N4 nanocomposite (Tsvetkov et al. 2020), prepared by the solvothermal method. During the photodegradation process, rGO (reduced GO) acted as an electron mediator, and efficiently separated photo-induced charge carriers (e−/h+), it also enhanced the adsorption ability to target pollutants. Meanwhile, ZnFe2O4 and g-C3N4 combined as type-II heterojunctions, which also reduced charge carrier recombination. These factors greatly improved the overall photodegradation efficiency. In conclusion, the introduction of the functional substrates such as graphene can further improve the performance of type-II heterojunction.
Mechanism for antibiotics photodegradation in the C3N4@MnFe2O4-G/PS system (Wang et al. 2017).
Mechanism for antibiotics photodegradation in the C3N4@MnFe2O4-G/PS system (Wang et al. 2017).
Spinel ferrite/other carbon materials
Above all, if combined with g-C3N4 or graphene, spinel ferrite-based photocatalysts can effectively eliminate organic pollutants. However, the preparation of graphene or its derivatives is very sophisticated and expensive. In the following section, several cost-effective carbon materials are introduced as photocatalyst substrates (Chen et al. 2019). The brief information of these papers is summarized in Table 3.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/other carbon materials photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MnFe2O4/g-C3N4/porous carbon microspheres | Hydrothermal method | Methyl orange, 10 mg L−1 | 300 W Xenon lamp with a 400 nm cutoff filter as visible light source, 1.0 g L−1 | 99.30%/75 min | Hu et al. (2021) |
multi-walled carbon nanotubes/MnFe2O4 | Hydrothermal method | Phenol, 5 mg L−1 | 11 W mercury germicidal-lamp wavelength of 254 nm; 0.2 g L−1 | ≈22.50%/120 min | Hazarika et al. (2018) |
ZnFe2O4/B, N-codoped biochar | One-pot microwave-assisted pyrolysis method | Tetracycline hydrochloride, 150 mg L−1 | Xe lamp (500 mW cm−2); 1/3 g L−1 | 98.19%/120 min | Peng et al. (2021) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MnFe2O4/g-C3N4/porous carbon microspheres | Hydrothermal method | Methyl orange, 10 mg L−1 | 300 W Xenon lamp with a 400 nm cutoff filter as visible light source, 1.0 g L−1 | 99.30%/75 min | Hu et al. (2021) |
multi-walled carbon nanotubes/MnFe2O4 | Hydrothermal method | Phenol, 5 mg L−1 | 11 W mercury germicidal-lamp wavelength of 254 nm; 0.2 g L−1 | ≈22.50%/120 min | Hazarika et al. (2018) |
ZnFe2O4/B, N-codoped biochar | One-pot microwave-assisted pyrolysis method | Tetracycline hydrochloride, 150 mg L−1 | Xe lamp (500 mW cm−2); 1/3 g L−1 | 98.19%/120 min | Peng et al. (2021) |
(a and b) SEM images of Mn@PC/g-C3N4; (c) illustrated mechanism for photocatalytic degradation of MO by Mn@PC/g-C3N4 (Hu et al. 2021).
(a and b) SEM images of Mn@PC/g-C3N4; (c) illustrated mechanism for photocatalytic degradation of MO by Mn@PC/g-C3N4 (Hu et al. 2021).
Second, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Hazarika et al. decorated MnFe2O4 nanoparticles onto MWCNTs (MWCNTs/MnFe2O4) via the hydrothermal method (Hazarika et al. 2018), with a particle size of 27–30 nm. The nanocomposites exhibited superior phenol photodegradation efficiency compared with pristine MnFe2O4, due to the inhibition of photo-induced e−/h+ pair recombination by MWCNTs. However, the degradation experiments were carried out under UV light, which means MWCNTs/MnFe2O4 only responded to visible light. This greatly hinders its practical application since UV light is only a small proportion of the sunlight spectrum. The production cost for MWCNTs is still relatively high, thus it is suggested that much cheaper carbon materials with similar functions should be developed as a substrate of the photocatalyst.
(a and b) SEM and (c and d) TEM images of ZnFe/BN-biochar; (e) photocatalytic mechanism of ZnFe/BN-biochar (Peng et al. 2021).
(a and b) SEM and (c and d) TEM images of ZnFe/BN-biochar; (e) photocatalytic mechanism of ZnFe/BN-biochar (Peng et al. 2021).
Above all, the photocatalyst composed of spinel ferrite and carbon material can effectively eliminate various organic pollutants; however, higher demands are proposed nowadays to meet the growing requirements for wastewater treatment. Thus, developing high-performance and easy-recyclable photocatalysts from low-cost materials has been a challenging and urgent task. It is suggested that researchers focus on the development of ternary photocatalytic composite, which is composed by spinel ferrite-based heterojunction and carbon material. Moreover, the development of cost-effective carbon materials, such as biochar, is another important research topic especially to improve the stability of the long-term photodegradation process.
SPINEL FERRITE/BI-BASED MATERIALS
The heterojunctions of spinel ferrite and Bi-based semiconductors have recently been extensively studied in recent years. Typical Bi-based semiconductors are: BiOX (X = Cl, Br, I), Bi2WO6, Bi2O2CO3, BiVO4, Bi2S3 and so on.
Spinel ferrite/BiOX
Due to the unique structure and excellent light absorption ability, Bi-based materials have become a hotspot in the research field of photocatalysis. Among various Bi-based materials, Sillén-type bismuth oxyhalides (BiOX, X = Cl, Br, I) have drawn great interest (Wang et al. 2020b). Due to its narrow bandgap, BiOX possesses a high absorption ability to visible light (Ye et al. 2014). Moreover, their two-dimensional layered structure also facilitates photocatalytic performance. However, several drawbacks restrict their practical application (Mengting et al. 2022), such as high charge carrier recombination, and catalyst recovery limitations. Until now, many methods have been proposed to overcome these problems (Hussain et al. 2022), and among them, the incorporation of spinel ferrite has been considered a promising strategy (Suresh et al. 2021), which not only facilitates photocatalytic performance but also enhances recyclability via magnetic recovery (Ma et al. 2021). This strategy endows BiOX with a high potential for wastewater treatment. The brief information of the following papers is summarized in Table 4.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/bismuth oxyhalide photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4 nanofibers/(001) BiOCl nanosheets | Electrospinning and solvothermal method | Rhodamine B, 10 mg L−1 | 150 W xenon lamp equipped with a cutoff glass filter (>420 nm) as visible light source, 1.0 g L−1 | 97.00%/180 min | Sun et al. (2018) |
NiFe2O4/N-doped BiOBr nanosheets | Hydrothermal method | Phenol, 10 mg L−1; K2Cr2O7 (Cr (VI)), 25 mg/L | 105 W compact fluorescent lamp with intensity as 1.0 × 104 lx (visible light); 1.0 g L−1 | Phenol, 95.90%/60 min; Cr (VI), 100%/60 min | Sin et al. (2021) |
MnFe2O4/BiOBr | Hydrothermal method | 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D), 20 mg L−1; Rhodamine B, 20 mg L−1 | 105 W compact fluorescent lamp with intensity as 1.0 × 104 lx (visible light); 1.0 g L−1 | 2.4-D, 96.50%/80 min; Rhodamine B, 89.30%/80 min | Sin et al. (2020) |
ZnFe2O4/BiOI | Solvothermal method | Acid orange 7, 20 mg L−1 | 400W halogen lamp; 1.0 g L−1 | 96.00%/180 min | Yosefi et al. (2017) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4 nanofibers/(001) BiOCl nanosheets | Electrospinning and solvothermal method | Rhodamine B, 10 mg L−1 | 150 W xenon lamp equipped with a cutoff glass filter (>420 nm) as visible light source, 1.0 g L−1 | 97.00%/180 min | Sun et al. (2018) |
NiFe2O4/N-doped BiOBr nanosheets | Hydrothermal method | Phenol, 10 mg L−1; K2Cr2O7 (Cr (VI)), 25 mg/L | 105 W compact fluorescent lamp with intensity as 1.0 × 104 lx (visible light); 1.0 g L−1 | Phenol, 95.90%/60 min; Cr (VI), 100%/60 min | Sin et al. (2021) |
MnFe2O4/BiOBr | Hydrothermal method | 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic (2,4-D), 20 mg L−1; Rhodamine B, 20 mg L−1 | 105 W compact fluorescent lamp with intensity as 1.0 × 104 lx (visible light); 1.0 g L−1 | 2.4-D, 96.50%/80 min; Rhodamine B, 89.30%/80 min | Sin et al. (2020) |
ZnFe2O4/BiOI | Solvothermal method | Acid orange 7, 20 mg L−1 | 400W halogen lamp; 1.0 g L−1 | 96.00%/180 min | Yosefi et al. (2017) |
SEM images of (a) ZnFe2O4 nanofibers, (b) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 (BZ2), (c) ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs obtained by solvothermal method), and (d) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 nanoparticles (BZ2 NPs) at low magnification and high magnification (inset); (e) photodegradation plots of Rhodamine B using different catalysts under visible light; and (f) photocurrent responses of (a) ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles, (b) ZnFe2O4 nanofibers, (c) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 nanoparticles (BZ2 NPs), and (d) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 (BZ2) (Sun et al. 2018).
SEM images of (a) ZnFe2O4 nanofibers, (b) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 (BZ2), (c) ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs obtained by solvothermal method), and (d) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 nanoparticles (BZ2 NPs) at low magnification and high magnification (inset); (e) photodegradation plots of Rhodamine B using different catalysts under visible light; and (f) photocurrent responses of (a) ZnFe2O4 nanoparticles, (b) ZnFe2O4 nanofibers, (c) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 nanoparticles (BZ2 NPs), and (d) p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4-2 (BZ2) (Sun et al. 2018).
Possible charge carrier separation paths and photodegradation mechanism of N-doped BiOBr/NiFe2O4 composite (Sin et al. 2021).
Possible charge carrier separation paths and photodegradation mechanism of N-doped BiOBr/NiFe2O4 composite (Sin et al. 2021).
Yosefi et al. synthesized flower-like p-BiOI/n-ZnFe2O4 junction via a solvothermal method (Yosefi et al. 2017). The composite showed higher photodegradation efficiency toward acid orange 7 under visible light, compared with pure ZnFe2O4 and BiOI. In the optimal composite, the mass ratio of BiOI/ZnFe2O4 was 80/20. The p–n junction facilitated the charge carrier separation and thus enhanced photocatalytic performance. This is similar to the above-mentioned p-BiOCl/n-ZnFe2O4. Xia et al. prepared flower-like NiFe2O4/BiOI (NFO/BOI) nanocomposites by solvothermal method (Xia et al. 2018). The photoactivity was evaluated by the degradation of organic dyes under visible light. The NiFe2O4/BiOI sample with 15 wt% NiFe2O4 exhibited the highest photodegradation performance. The quenching tests proved was the primary radical. The formation of type-II heterostructure improved the separation and restricted the recombination of electron–holes pairs. The composite showed no notable decrease in photoactivity after five recycles, implying its good stability. Based on the above literature works, it can be concluded that the coupling of BiOBr and NiFe2O4, or the coupling of BiOBr and MnFe2O4 is regarded as the optimal combination, compared with BiOCl, BiOI and other spinel ferrites. This is because of their appropriate band matching, leading to the construction of Z-scheme heterojunction. It is suggested that researchers should pay attention to both composites in future work, in order to develop high-performance photocatalysts for wastewater treatment.
Spinel ferrite/Aurivillius Bi-based compounds
Bi2WO6 is often regarded the simplest member of the Aurivillius family with one perovskite layer in its molecular structure (Tachibana 2015), its excellent visible light response ability makes itself a good candidate for photocatalytic purposes. However, its high charge carrier recombination greatly reduced its photocatalytic activity, thus greatly restricting its practical application potential. The coupling of Bi2WO6 and other semiconductors lead to the formation of composites with varied morphologies, and has been considered an effective strategy to build high-performance photocatalysts. The brief information of the following papers is summarized in Table 5.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/Aurivillius Bi-based material photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/Bi2WO6 | Solvothermal method | Tetracycline hydrochloride, 50 mg L−1 | 500 W Xe lamp (>420 nm), 1.0 g L−1 | 96.85%/90 min | Zhong et al. (2017) |
NiFe2O4 nanoplates/Bi2WO6 nanoflakes | Calcination and hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 10 ppm; Methylene blue, 10 ppm | 100-W solar simulator; 0.3 g L−1 | Tetracycline, 96.81%/96 min; Methylene blue, 99.16%/60 min | Koutavarapu et al. (2021) |
ZnFe2O4/Bi2O2CO3 | Hydrothermal method | Rhodamine B, 5 mg L−1 | 500 W xenon lamp (simulant sunlight); 0.5 g L−1 | ≈71.00%/180 min | Liu et al. (2018) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/Bi2WO6 | Solvothermal method | Tetracycline hydrochloride, 50 mg L−1 | 500 W Xe lamp (>420 nm), 1.0 g L−1 | 96.85%/90 min | Zhong et al. (2017) |
NiFe2O4 nanoplates/Bi2WO6 nanoflakes | Calcination and hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 10 ppm; Methylene blue, 10 ppm | 100-W solar simulator; 0.3 g L−1 | Tetracycline, 96.81%/96 min; Methylene blue, 99.16%/60 min | Koutavarapu et al. (2021) |
ZnFe2O4/Bi2O2CO3 | Hydrothermal method | Rhodamine B, 5 mg L−1 | 500 W xenon lamp (simulant sunlight); 0.5 g L−1 | ≈71.00%/180 min | Liu et al. (2018) |
Zhong et al. synthesized Bi2WO6/ZnFe2O4 composite via a two-step solvothermal method (Zhong et al. 2017). The combination of ZnFe2O4 greatly enhanced the adsorption and photodegradation ability of Bi2WO6, and endowed the catalyst with the magnetic recyclable property. The composite with 0.15 wt% of ZnFe2O4 presented the highest photodegradation efficiency toward TC hydrochloride (TCH) under visible light, with aremoval percentage of 96.85% in 90 min. The enhanced photoactivity was ascribed to the effective separation of photo-generated electron–hole pairs at the interface. After five recycling tests, the TCH removal rate dropped to 81.52%, which was attributed to the catalyst loss during recycling processes. The photocatalytic mechanism of Bi2WO6/ZnFe2O4 was attributed to atype-II heterojunction.

SEM images of (a) NiFe2O4 nanoplates, (b) Bi2WO6 nanoflakes, and (c) NiFe2O4/Bi2WO6 composite; (d) proposed Z-scheme mechanism about photodegradation of TC and MB in NiFe2O4/Bi2WO6 composite (Koutavarapu et al. 2021).
SEM images of (a) NiFe2O4 nanoplates, (b) Bi2WO6 nanoflakes, and (c) NiFe2O4/Bi2WO6 composite; (d) proposed Z-scheme mechanism about photodegradation of TC and MB in NiFe2O4/Bi2WO6 composite (Koutavarapu et al. 2021).
Proposed photodegradation mechanism of Bi2O2CO3/ZnFe2O4 heterojunction (Liu et al. 2018).
Proposed photodegradation mechanism of Bi2O2CO3/ZnFe2O4 heterojunction (Liu et al. 2018).
Spinel ferrite/other Bi-based materials
Except for BiOX and Aurivillius Bi-based compounds, other Bi-based photocatalysts, such as BiVO4 and Bi2S3, have also attracted attention. The photocatalytic materials based on these materials and spinel ferrites have been developed. The brief information of the following papers is summarized in Table 6.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/other Bi-based materials photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/BiVO4 | Co-precipitation method | Methylene blue, 15 mg L−1 | 500 W Halogen lamp (visible light), 2.0 g L−1 | 99.0%/300 min | Xu & Song (2017) |
ZnFe2O4/BiVO4 | Sol–gel auto-combustion and calcination method | Methyl orange, 10−5 mol/L | a light filter (420 nm) was added to a light source (500 W halogen tungsten lamp); 1.5 g L−1 | 64.15%/120 min | Aiqiong et al. (2021) |
MnFe2O4/BiVO4 | Hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 10 ppm | 30 W Duhalled LED used as visible light; 0.25 g L−1 | ≈92.00%/120 min | Dieu Cam et al. (2021) |
ZnFe2O4/Bi2S3 | Hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 10 mg L−1; Cr (VI), 10 mg L−1 | 300 W Xe lamp used as visible light; 0.3 g L−1 | Tetracycline, 91.60%/120 min; Cr (VI), 96.70%/120 min | Yan et al. (2023) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/BiVO4 | Co-precipitation method | Methylene blue, 15 mg L−1 | 500 W Halogen lamp (visible light), 2.0 g L−1 | 99.0%/300 min | Xu & Song (2017) |
ZnFe2O4/BiVO4 | Sol–gel auto-combustion and calcination method | Methyl orange, 10−5 mol/L | a light filter (420 nm) was added to a light source (500 W halogen tungsten lamp); 1.5 g L−1 | 64.15%/120 min | Aiqiong et al. (2021) |
MnFe2O4/BiVO4 | Hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 10 ppm | 30 W Duhalled LED used as visible light; 0.25 g L−1 | ≈92.00%/120 min | Dieu Cam et al. (2021) |
ZnFe2O4/Bi2S3 | Hydrothermal method | Tetracycline, 10 mg L−1; Cr (VI), 10 mg L−1 | 300 W Xe lamp used as visible light; 0.3 g L−1 | Tetracycline, 91.60%/120 min; Cr (VI), 96.70%/120 min | Yan et al. (2023) |

Proposed charge carrier separation and TC photodegradation mechanism using MnFe2O4/BiVO4 heterojunction (Dieu Cam et al. 2021).
Proposed charge carrier separation and TC photodegradation mechanism using MnFe2O4/BiVO4 heterojunction (Dieu Cam et al. 2021).


Enhanced charge carrier transfer driven by internal electric field during a photocatalytic process of ZnFe2O4/Bi2S3 (ZFO/BS) (Yan et al. 2023).
Enhanced charge carrier transfer driven by internal electric field during a photocatalytic process of ZnFe2O4/Bi2S3 (ZFO/BS) (Yan et al. 2023).
Above all, the photocatalysts derived from spinel ferrite and Bi-based materials have been applied in various organic pollutant degradation, which all exhibited excellent photoactivity and recyclability. Future research work should focus on the proper energy band coupling between bismuth semiconductor and spinel ferrite, in order to build a Z-scheme structure for superior photocatalytic activity. As for current knowledge, Bi2O2CO3/ZnFe2O4, Bi2WO6/NiFe2O4 and BiVO4/MnFe2O4 are typical examples. Other issues should also be considered in future work: the catalyst amount during photodegradation should be further reduced through the modification and optimization of the photocatalyst's structure and physicochemical properties. Moreover, the stability and recyclability of photocatalysts should be further improved.
SPINEL FERRITE/TiO2
TiO2 has long been studied as a green semiconductor, especially in the aspect of photocatalytic degradation, due to its advantages such as abundance, low cost, nontoxicity and chemical stability (Nur et al. 2022). However, the wide band gap of pure TiO2 (3.2 eV) greatly limits its light absorption range (Li et al. 2022d), only responding to UV light, which accounted for 4% of solar energy. Besides, other disadvantages, such as rapid charge carrier recombination, low recyclability and activity regulation, also restrict its practical application (Mohd Adnan et al. 2019). To overcome all these issues and design visible-light-driven photocatalysts, the coupling of TiO2 and spinel ferrite has been proven effective and promising. The brief information of the following papers is summarized in Table 7.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/TiO2 photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/TiO2 | Hydrothermal method | Humic acid, 10 mg L−1; Florfeniol, 10 mg L−1; Tetracyclines, 10 mg L−1; Bisphenol A, 10 mg L−1 | 300 W Xe lamp (visible light), 0.2 g L−1 (0.6 g L−1 for Bisphenol A degradation) | Humic acid, 0.01766min−1; Florfeniol, 0.01504 min−1; Tetracyclines, 0.0166 min−1; Bisphenol A, 0.01564 min−1 | Zeng et al. (2022) |
MnFe2O4@ reduced graphene oxide @TiO2 | Hydrothermal and calcination method | Ofloxacin, 20 mg L−1 | a solar simulator equipped with halogenide high-pressure lamp (1,000 W/m2); 0.5 g L−1; pH = 5.4 | 8.56 × 10−3 min−1 | Firtina-Ertis & Kerkez-Kuyumcu (2022) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/TiO2 | Hydrothermal method | Humic acid, 10 mg L−1; Florfeniol, 10 mg L−1; Tetracyclines, 10 mg L−1; Bisphenol A, 10 mg L−1 | 300 W Xe lamp (visible light), 0.2 g L−1 (0.6 g L−1 for Bisphenol A degradation) | Humic acid, 0.01766min−1; Florfeniol, 0.01504 min−1; Tetracyclines, 0.0166 min−1; Bisphenol A, 0.01564 min−1 | Zeng et al. (2022) |
MnFe2O4@ reduced graphene oxide @TiO2 | Hydrothermal and calcination method | Ofloxacin, 20 mg L−1 | a solar simulator equipped with halogenide high-pressure lamp (1,000 W/m2); 0.5 g L−1; pH = 5.4 | 8.56 × 10−3 min−1 | Firtina-Ertis & Kerkez-Kuyumcu (2022) |
(a) Illustration of two possible charge carrier transfer paths at the interface of TiO2/ZnFe2O4 composite and (b) the mechanism of N2 photo-fixation using Z-scheme TiO2/ZnFe2O4 composite (Rong et al. 2019).
(a) Illustration of two possible charge carrier transfer paths at the interface of TiO2/ZnFe2O4 composite and (b) the mechanism of N2 photo-fixation using Z-scheme TiO2/ZnFe2O4 composite (Rong et al. 2019).
Wang et al. prepared TiO2/NiFe2O4 heterojunction via the hydrothermal method and used it to detect sub-ppm trimethylamine with the aid of visible light (Wang et al. 2022). Trimethylamine (TMA) is a tertiary amine compound, responsible for the unpleasant smell of decomposing fish, thus it is an effective indicator of seafood freshness (Zhao et al. 2021a). TiO2/NiFe2O4 sensor exhibited enhanced gas-sensing performance, due to the formation of p–n heterojunction, which enhanced charge flow between two components. This work also extended the application potential of TiO2/NiFe2O4 heterojunction. Moreover, the photocatalytic activity of the TiO2/NiFe2O4 composite can be altered after TiO2 was doped. Kuyumcu et al. prepared TiO2/NiFe2O4 by a complex assisted vapor thermal method (Firtina-Ertis & Kerkez-Kuyumcu 2022), and coupled Ag+ by wet-impregnation. This composite was used in photocatalytic hydrogen production, and the sample with 12 wt% of NiFe2O4 and 0.5 wt% of Ag+ presented the best photoactivity. •OH played a vital role during this process, as well as . Based on this, S-scheme heterojunction was proposed to interpret the photocatalytic mechanism (Fu et al. 2019). There was an internal electric field from NiFe2O4 to TiO2, the photo-induced e− on the CB of TiO2 combined with photo-induced h+ on the VB of NiFe2O4. The h+ on the VB of TiO2 reacted with the methanol via Ag+ and generated CO2, while the e− on the CB of NiFe2O4 combined with H+ and generated H2. As long as proper band alignment between components, S-scheme heterojunction can be built between p-type and n-type semiconductors, or between two n-type semiconductors, or two p-type semiconductors (Naderi et al. 2023). This junction exhibits promoted redox ability similar to the Z-scheme, so it can be seen as a promising route to develop a highly efficient photocatalytic composite. The introduction of doping further enhanced photodegradation efficiency by prolonging charge carrier lifetime, providing an extra strategy to enhance photocatalytic application potential.
Gad-Allah et al. fabricated a core double-shell MnFe2O4@rGO@TiO2 composite via a successive hydrothermal and calcination method (Abdel-Wahed et al. 2020). The composite exhibited superior photodegradation of ofloxacin under solar light, compared with single component. This work also revealed that MnFe2O4@rGO@TiO2 of 50-mg rGO (calcined at 400 °C for 2 h) exhibited the highest photodegradation rate at pH = 5.4 of water polluted with ofloxacin. MnFe2O4 acted as recombination center due to its energy band position, thus leading to less efficient photoactivity, however, as an interlayer between MnFe2O4 and TiO2, rGO attracted the photo-induced e− from CB of TiO2 and prolonged its lifetime to enhance the overall photoactivity. This ternary composite conserved its photoactivity after six consecutive runs, proving itself stable for long-term practical application. In conclusion, although the combination of MnFe2O4@TiO2was attributed as type-II heterojunction, the substrate rGO acted as interlayer and thus hindered charge carrier recombination, promoting overall photocatalytic efficiency. It is suggested that, heterojunction components should be loaded onto functional material to further improve the entire photodegradation performance, for example, carbon-based materials.
Above all, the coupling of spinel ferrite with TiO2 not only improved photocatalytic performance, but also endowed the magnetic recyclable ability. However, there are many types of junction structures as for photocatalytic mechanisms. Thus, it is suggested that more research work should be done to investigate the impact of fabrication methods and conditions on the band alignment of spinel ferrite/TiO2 composites. Meanwhile, the doping and substrate loading strategies are also important, and related research is needed in future research work.
SPINEL FERRITE/ZnO
As one of the extensively studied photocatalysts, ZnO has attracted considerable interest due to its low cost, nontoxicity and high active properties (Goktas & Goktas 2021). However, pure ZnO can only be stimulated by UV light, due to its wide band gap (Hullavarad et al. 2009). This greatly lowers its response to sunlight, since UV light merely accounts for 4% of the sunlight spectrum. Besides, another disadvantage of ZnO is its low stability, since it can be affected by photo-corrosion (Taylor et al. 2019). Both factors greatly restrict its practical application as a photocatalyst. Thus, researchers have been developing various strategies to modify ZnO to improve its quantum efficiency, improving the photocatalytic activity and stability (Tian et al. 2012).
One of the effective methods is the combination of ZnO with other semiconductors (Goktas & Goktas 2021). Kuang et al. synthesized an octahedral-like ZnO/ZnFe2O4 composite via the solvothermal method (Kuang et al. 2019), and evaluated its photoactivity via dye photodegradation. The sample with a molar ratio of 3:1 presented the highest photodegradation performance, 82.7 and 91.2% after 120 min of UV-visible light and 140 min of visible light, respectively. Compared with ZnO and ZnFe2O4, the heterojunction exhibited higher photocatalytic performance, due to the synergetic effect of mesoporous structure, effective charge carrier separation at the interface, which improved light response ability, adsorption and degradation ability toward organic dye. this composite also exhibited good stability, no obvious decrease in photoactivity can be detected after four cycles. Choudhary et al. also reported the photodegradation using ZnO/ZnFe2O4 composite (Choudhary et al. 2022), prepared via the co-precipitation method. The superior photodegradation efficiency of ZnO/ZnFe2O4 was ascribed to extended light absorption range, and suppressed charge carrier recombination due to heterostructure. They also reported the outstandingly stable property of ZnO/ZnFe2O4. However, due to the band alignment, the reported composites from both papers were attributed to type-II heterojunctions, in which electrons moved to a less negative position while holes moved to a less positive position, leading to reduced redox ability.
Proposed mechanism of photodegradation using (a) NiFe2O4/ZnO heterojunction (Munir et al. 2021) and (b) traditional type-II route and direct Z-scheme junction of g-C3N4/ZnO/NiFe2O4 composite (Garg et al. 2022).
Proposed mechanism of photodegradation using (a) NiFe2O4/ZnO heterojunction (Munir et al. 2021) and (b) traditional type-II route and direct Z-scheme junction of g-C3N4/ZnO/NiFe2O4 composite (Garg et al. 2022).
Boutra et al. combined tannic acid (TA, a carbon material) with ZnO/MnFe2O4 via a two-step solvothermal method (Boutra et al. 2020). The ternary catalyst presented higher dye photodegradation performance under visible light. Both the narrow band gap of MnFe2O4 and the electron transfer ability of TA enhanced the photodegradation performance. The ternary composite still remained high photodegradation efficiency after five cycles, proving its high stability and reusability. In conclusion, the introduction of a third material such as TA can promote photodegradation performance, which is similar to the functions of the above-mentioned carbon materials.
The brief information of the above papers is summarized in Table 8. Above all, the introduction of spinel ferrite affects ZnO in several aspects: first, tuning the band gap of ZnO; second, enhancing the photocatalytic activity; third, improving the stability and recyclability. However, as to its practical application potential, the visible light response range and photocatalytic activity of ZnO-based composite should be further extended, such as the construction of a Z-scheme junction via third-party component addition. Thus, to develop novel photocatalysts with high visible-light absorption ability, high quantum efficiency and stability, is still a major research hotspot in the field of photocatalysis.
Summarized information of spinel ferrite/ZnO photocatalysts
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/ZnO | Solvothermal method followed by thermal treatment | Methylene blue, 10 mg L−1 | UV-vis (350 ≤ λ ≤ 780 nm) or visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) generated by a 300W Xe lamp, 1.0 g L−1 | 91.20% after 120 min of UV-vis; 82.70% after140 min of visible light | Kuang et al. (2019) |
ZnFe2O4/ZnO | Co-precipitation method | Methylene blue (10 μM); Malachite green (10 μM); Methyl orange (10 μM); Rhodamine B (10 μM) | Sunlight; 1.0 g L−1 | Methylene blue: 90.30%/24 min; Malachite green: 93.10%/24 min; Methyl orange: 28.10%/24 min; Rhodamine B: 57.2%/24 min | Choudhary et al. (2022) |
NiFe2O4/ZnO | Ultrasonication method | Methyl orange (10 mg L−1); Methyl blue (10 mg L−1); Crystal violet (10 mg L−1) | Sunlight; 0.6 g L−1 | Methyl orange: 49.2%/40 min; Methylene blue: 44.40%/40 min; Crystal violet: 41.30%/40 min | Munir et al. (2021) |
NiFe2O4/ZnO/g-C3N4 | Sonication–calcination method | Levofloxacin, 30 mg L−1; Ciprofloxacin, 10 mg L−1; Ofloxacin, 15 mg L−1 | 400 W Hg lamp as visible light source with light intensity near the surface of solution to be 51.2 mW/cm2; 0.5 g L−1 | Levofloxacin: 94.00%/90 min; Ciprofloxacin: 80.00%/90 min; Ofloxacin: 85.00%/90 min | Garg et al. (2022) |
MnFe2O4/ZnO/tannic acid | Solvothermal method | Congo Red, 16 mg L−1 | 128 W Xenon lamp (visible light); 0.2 g L−1 | 84.20%/90 min | Boutra et al. (2020) |
Photocatalyst . | Preparation strategy . | Target pollutant . | Photodegradation conditions . | Degradation percentage/reaction time . | Ref . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZnFe2O4/ZnO | Solvothermal method followed by thermal treatment | Methylene blue, 10 mg L−1 | UV-vis (350 ≤ λ ≤ 780 nm) or visible light (λ ≥ 420 nm) generated by a 300W Xe lamp, 1.0 g L−1 | 91.20% after 120 min of UV-vis; 82.70% after140 min of visible light | Kuang et al. (2019) |
ZnFe2O4/ZnO | Co-precipitation method | Methylene blue (10 μM); Malachite green (10 μM); Methyl orange (10 μM); Rhodamine B (10 μM) | Sunlight; 1.0 g L−1 | Methylene blue: 90.30%/24 min; Malachite green: 93.10%/24 min; Methyl orange: 28.10%/24 min; Rhodamine B: 57.2%/24 min | Choudhary et al. (2022) |
NiFe2O4/ZnO | Ultrasonication method | Methyl orange (10 mg L−1); Methyl blue (10 mg L−1); Crystal violet (10 mg L−1) | Sunlight; 0.6 g L−1 | Methyl orange: 49.2%/40 min; Methylene blue: 44.40%/40 min; Crystal violet: 41.30%/40 min | Munir et al. (2021) |
NiFe2O4/ZnO/g-C3N4 | Sonication–calcination method | Levofloxacin, 30 mg L−1; Ciprofloxacin, 10 mg L−1; Ofloxacin, 15 mg L−1 | 400 W Hg lamp as visible light source with light intensity near the surface of solution to be 51.2 mW/cm2; 0.5 g L−1 | Levofloxacin: 94.00%/90 min; Ciprofloxacin: 80.00%/90 min; Ofloxacin: 85.00%/90 min | Garg et al. (2022) |
MnFe2O4/ZnO/tannic acid | Solvothermal method | Congo Red, 16 mg L−1 | 128 W Xenon lamp (visible light); 0.2 g L−1 | 84.20%/90 min | Boutra et al. (2020) |
QUANTUM DOTS AS COUPLING CANDIDATES
Recently, quantum dots (QDs) have been intensively studied due to their high specific surface area, low cost, numerous active sites, water insolubility, and excellent thermal stability (Sharma et al. 2019). Thanks to the unique quantum confinement effect derived from ultra-small size (2–10 nm), the accumulated electrons in QDs result in an enhanced light absorption range (Wang et al. 2020a). The combination of semiconductor and QDs has been reported as a cost-effective strategy to build photocatalytic heterojunction, which exhibits enhanced photocatalytic activity due to effective charge carrier separation (Yuan et al. 2021). In this section, some typical QDs are introduced as coupling semiconductor nanoparticles: ZnS, ZnO, Cu–In–S, and Ag–In–S. Although currently there have been no reports on the combination of these QDs with spinel ferrite, it is suggested that this combination is promising for the development of high performance photocatalysts.
Proposed mechanism of the charge transfer route of ZnS(QD)/Fe2O3(QD)/rGO under (a, b) UV light and (c) visible light (Liu et al. 2020).
Proposed mechanism of the charge transfer route of ZnS(QD)/Fe2O3(QD)/rGO under (a, b) UV light and (c) visible light (Liu et al. 2020).
Ikram et al. reported the photoelectrochemical conversion of ZnO(QD)/α-Fe2O3 thin films (Ikram et al. 2015). This composite showed 5.5 fold enhancement in photocurrent density under sunlight. α-Fe2O3 acted as solar energy harnessing material while ZnO QDs promoted charge carrier separation and transportation, since photo-induced holes can be trapped in the oxygen vacancy state, thus hindering the recombination of charge carriers. In conclusion, due to its wide band gap, ZnO(QD) exhibited similar optical properties to that of ZnS(QD), thus more work is suggested to be done to transform ZnO(QD)-based composite into a visible-light-driven photocatalyst.
Cu–In–S (CIS) has been reported as a spectral sensitizer, absorbing light across the entire visible light region (Yue et al. 2018). It can also inject electrons into a wide band gap semiconductor (Yue et al. 2018). Based on this, Raevskaya et al. reported a TiO2/CIS@ZnS photoanode for photoelectrochemical solar cells (Raevskaya et al. 2016), and the optimal cell exhibited the average conversion efficiency of 8.15%, under the irradiation of a Xe lamp (30 mW cm−2). This cell also showed excellent stability. CIS@ZnS was used as a light harvester, presenting enhanced light conversion efficiency compared with CIS, since ZnS suppressed the recombination of charge carriers. In conclusion, the visible light absorption ability of CIS is much better than that of ZnS or ZnO, thus it can be considered as a promising route to combine CIS(QD) with spinel ferrite to build high-performance photocatalyst under the condition of appropriate band alignment.
Shi et al. reported the Ag–In–S QDs for photocatalytic CO2 reduction to syngas under visible light (Shi et al. 2021). The Ag to In molar ratio affected the activity and selectivity by adjusting the band gap structure and charge carrier lifetime due to structural defects. The addition of Co(bpy)32+ (bpy = 2′2-bipyridine) can enhance the conversion of CO2 to CO as well as promote the photo-stability of Ag–In–S QDs. In conclusion, the excellent visible-light-driven catalytic activity of Ag–In–S QDs proved itself a good option to be combined with spinel ferrite for the development of a high-performance photocatalyst. The adjustable band gap structure of Ag–In–S QDs can be a flexible feature to couple Ag–In–S QDs with spinel ferrite with varied band positions to realize proper band alignment.
CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVE
Due to the excellent photocatalytic activity, stability and magnetic property, spinel ferrite-based composites have been intensively studied in pollutant degradation applications. The related research findings present excellent removal performance of organic pollutants, offering an effective strategy for wastewater treatment, and proving spinel ferrite-based materials as a promising candidate for industrial scale applications. This paper mainly concludes the construction and photodegradation application of spinel ferrite-based materials: spinel ferrite/carbon material, spinel ferrite/Bi-based materials, spinel ferrite/TiO2 and spinel ferrite/ZnO, in which ZnFe2O4, NiFe2O4 or MnFe2O4 are chosen as spinel ferrites. The review compared three widely used preparation routes: hydrothermal (and solvothermal), co-precipitation and sol–gel auto-combustion methods. Among these, co-precipitation is promising for large-scale production, yet it still has certain drawbacks. This review also discussed the relationship between structural property and photocatalytic activity. Out of various junction structures, Z-scheme and S-scheme can realize both high photocatalytic activity and redox capability, and their loading onto function materials can further improve photodegradation performance, thus all these are considered key topics for future research. Moreover, there is a lack of research on pollutant degradation in real water bodies. All these aspects imply that, as for the practical application of spinel ferrite-based materials, there is still a long way to go, since a myriad of problems need to be fixed, which requires more systematic research work in the future.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors sincerely thank the financial support given from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41977205).
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.